Welcome to the Area 51 cinema, where you'll find movies of some of the stuff we're currently doing, and have done in the past. You'll find a mixture of shows here; club weekender's, huge sprawling cabaret performances, stage shows and short taster films.
Thanks to Another Schmuck productions for following us around and editing the whole lot together, and if you'd like a nice high-quality DVD then please ask and we'll dispatch at once...
THE STUFF IN FAVOURITES IS STILL US, BUT TOO BIG TO FIT ON OUR SERVER (10 MINUTE CAP FOR RECENT ACCOUNTS) SO THEY'RE OVER ON TIM'S SITE. EITHER THAT OR THEY'RE INTERESTING BITS OF US WE'VE FOUND FILMED BY OTHER PEOPLE AND POSTED ON RU-vid. LET US KNOW IF YOU SPOT ANY DECENT BITS YOURSELF.
Please refrain from smoking in the auditorium, and keep your feet off the back of the chair in front. Careful use of a bone saw is permitted if your view is blocked by large and / or hairy cranium. Enjoy the show...
The legs would look more legit if the knee was bent more, with longer feet, and toes longer and splayed. Also, a frame to hold the tail horizontal would be better.
This with J lasers Spider-Man wall climbing suit would be a nightmare to see cuz I'd actually believe Xenomorphs came to Earth if I wasn't behind this plan
Actually how can you get those legs and how much are they worth because im thinking on a hyperrealistic alternate costume for Halloween and I need a link for thoes legs so I can buy them later on in the year
not simply jump-scared - but there is that too. Trail 1 is an atmospheric journey lasting about an hour, if you like your folk horror you'll appreciate this. It's highly theatrical and very immersive. Trail 2 is smaller and more claustrophobic
So it’s you who gets to decide whether a woman is sexy and beautiful, and whether you can belittle them by saying they‘re not? What an audaciously stupid comment.
compelling special effects but defiantly fake! firstly , after year 2000, videos are not black and white and an important video like this should be filmed in color, especially when there are colored cameras around. Secondly...no blood and clean gloves when they cut the brain but the blood starts gashing around the gut? doesn't add up. Thirdly, the entire time these two people in suit and protective masks doing their procedure and at the end the phone rings and he is quick to pick it up with the gloves he used to cut the alien and takes off the mask right next to the alien. If this was real Alien, I would be hella cautious about taking off mask around the alien, let along still wearing the bloody gloves. Aliens are fake, but at most they are demonic figures. If aliens were real, I am sure that over the past thousands years, we would've found their dead bodies. And those unidentifiable objects in the sky, they are just that, unidentifiable... UFO ....not Aliens. But as far as the reality concerned, Aliens fairy tales are all fake!
Found it it was 1995 the Ray Santilli alien autopsy. -I know this says 2006 but does anyone remember watching the original on actual TV in 1989? I have a distinct memory of this being broadcast while I was in kindergarten and it’s why I have a fear of aliens. My father remembered watching it too and we even talked about it in the 1990’s. The alien didn’t look like this though he actually looked like a bloated corpse and the surgeons were in actual medical gear. It was in black and white but, the alien actually moved around and squealed despite looking dead when they cut into him.
Fake! That’s not real footage from the 40s, this cam has such smooth turn and the guy behind the cam is breathing so hard in mic that it’s a making a particular sound that wasn’t available in that time. It’s making a wind tunnel noise, which is telling me he is literally breathing from his nostrils directly into the mic. Nice try though lol
Crazy how this looks like the same alien that got cut open in a vid the CIA or some government I think confirmed.just a bit fater but looks a bit the same
She looks like such a wholesome girl. There is just no way she was into Manson and his sexual fetishes. Of course she did not consent to their sexual relationship. No way she was the one using Manson to make it in Hollywood. She was just a kid who happened to be 26 years old. I mean it only took 10 years for her to tell her story because she was running out of money of course and Manson wouldn't agree to give give her any based on her threats. I totally believe her. So convincing. EDIT after response. I was being sarcastic to prove a point is all. I do not like Manson. In fact I despise him. I do not like the circus of social justice by discussing serious allegations with the entire world before the accused has been arrested, charged and tried for the alleged crime. Speaking publicly before this happens only serves one purpose in my opinion and this is to gain the support of the ill informed masses. This is extremely suspicious and devious to me. The presumption of innocence and due process is in place for a reason and should not be overlooked or forgotten. Social justice is in place to cancel a person before they are given their day in court and is in place to bury the truth and not uncover it.
I'd be careful how you judge her without knowing her at all. Esme was one of the very first modern day (and still in my mind the best) burlesque "superstars". Before the market was flooded with poor imitations. She was classy, an absolute professional and very sweet. And I'm sure you're aware that actresses are just that, so don't confuse the stage persona with real life.
@@AREA51CINEMA You mean how people are judging Manson without knowing him? Thank you because you completely proved the point I am intending to make. You absolutely nailed what it was I am alluding to.
@@rilenixx Equally wrong of course (judging Manson without knowing him), but I'm afraid people are people and the internet is full of this. However, in the case of Esme I just thought seeing as you posted on our vid of her you deserved a reply - and I can confirm she's pretty cool. I'm not sure you know either of them. It's always difficult hearing bad stuff about your hero but she's not the only accuser which might be worth taking into consideration - along with the fact that he's always delighted in some pretty fucked up shit maybe? I'm not sure he knows where to draw the line to be honest, superstardom does tend to go to the head?.. but that's just like my opinion, Man
@@AREA51CINEMA To be honest I do not like Manson. In fact I dislike him very much and I feel his music is terrible. What I don't like is this current trend of social justice. People who go public with serious allegations before the accused has had their chance to be arrested. charged and tried with the alleged crime in a court by a judge or jury of their peers, have alternative motives. I believe in the presumption of innocence and a thing called due process. I have absolutely no respect nor belief in anyone who does interviews and goes public with serious allegations before these accusations run their course through our judicial system and the accused is given a fair trial. If a person can't wait for this process to unfold and take it's course then I find it extremely suspicious. Let's be honest here, the majority of people on social media do not conduct proper research before concluding an individual is guilty of an allegation. In fact how can they come to a conclusion of any kind without all the facts of the case in front of them to look at? They are simply provided with one side of the story extremely prematurely and they decide within seconds if the accuser is in fact believable and telling the absolute truth. They merely go with the mob mentality and demand the person to be canceled immediately before the accused is even arrested, charged and tried of the crime. This new form of social justice should worry everyone who lives in America on a monumental level. It should be frowned upon by every and anyone who would want nothing less then to be presumed innocent if they are ever accused of a crime they may not have committed and this form of instant social justice be shut down immediately before it ruins the lives of anymore possibly innocent lives. So no I don't like Manson at all. I do cherish our presumption of innocence and due process. In fact everyone should before its too late and we can't regress from this madness of social justice. If somebody wishes to speak publicly after a trial takes place and the accused if found innocent but say the courts got it wrong then I can respect that. However speaking publicly BEFORE this takes place is not only suspicious but devious as well. There is a specific reason one wishes to gain the support of the dumbed down masses first and it is not because they are being truthful.
@@rilenixx that's fair comment, and I'd agree with a lot of it. Only thing I can really offer is that Esme has a better rep with people I know that Manson, and how/why she announced as she did I'm really not sure. But I don't think it makes her a liar or devious, I'd probably suggest she had her reasons. You have to remember that people in that (Manson) position have certainly got away with abusive behaviour in the past with little or no consequence - that doesn't mean they're all at it by any means - and yes I'm certain that there are disingenuous accusers out there jumping on the bandwagon as you suggest, but equally there are those who we should listen to.
