el mas grande de los reyes de toda la historia de grecia y del mundo y nadie se compara con el excepto julio cesar que un general que su mayor logro fue expandir el imperio y conquista la galia una tierra que en esos tiempos era considerada inposible de conquistar el unico que pudo hacerlo fue julio cesar el grande de roma y hoy en dia nadie podra volver hacer una azaña como esa almenos que alguien en el futuro inteligente y que este encontra de todo lo que gobierna este mundo moderno es capaz de hacerlo, LIBERTAD, SABIDURIA, RELIGION, PROSPERIDAD, MONARQUIA, DEMOCRACIA, PROGRESO, ORDEN, Y ``CAMBIO´´esos eran los deceos de alejandro y cesar que nunca lo consiguieron por que murieron antes de hacerlo
“I saw the Emperor - this soul of the world - go out from the city to survey his reign ; it is a truly wonderful sensation to see such an individual, who, concentrating on one point while seated on a horse, stretches over the world and dominates it.” - Hegel
Как же Бондарчук старший снял этот шедевр,глаз не оторвать... Слава всем павшим войнам на полях сражений,жаль что за всю историю не было времени когда европейцы не воевали друг с другом.
In fact, with all due respect to Napoleon, he was not as great as many of you think. This is a myth that was created during his lifetime. He was not the best commander of his time, the best was the Prince of Rybnin, Count of Italy A. V. Suvorov, who never lost a single battle in his entire life. Being already very old, constantly constrained by the control of the Vienna Hofrigsrat and Paul I from St. Petersburg, who interfered with any of his decisions, Suvorov defeated all of Napoleon's generals who got in his way, and then accomplished an unthinkable feat - crossing the Alps (in much more terrible conditions than Napoleon). And the battle on the Devil's Bridge impressed Switzerland so much that it gave Russia all the land near the bridge. And it belonged to her until 2022. Napoleon openly respected Suvorov and at one time even applied to the Russian army, hoping to become his assistant. But alas, he was refused, and Suvorov died, betrayed by Paul I many years before Napoleon's invasion. Napoleon did not spare his soldiers, calling them "char de cannon" - cannon fodder. Actually, one of the main themes of War and Peace, on which the film from the clip was shot, is precisely the disappointment of one of the heroes with Napoleon. When he, before his death, sees him up close and understands that he is an ordinary person, and not the supermind, the demigod that he was depicted as in newspapers and books.
Suvorov was a great general but Napoleon was better. Except during the Second Coalition, Suvorov didn’t fight opponents on the level Napoleon did. The Ottomans and Poles at that time were weaker than the Russian Empire.
@@archivesoffantasy5560 True, he did not fight. But he never had forces comparable to the entire Russian army of 1812. Take the same assault on the Izmail fortress, considered absolutely indestructible. And Suvorov took it in a few hours. Suvorov as a commander is extremely strong for several reasons. Firstly, he is a purebred military man, who devoted his entire life from childhood to the battlefield. Whereas Napoleon was a military man more out of necessity, and his main goal was power and glory. Secondly, he was a brilliant tactician and strategist, although here they are probably equal. And thirdly, Suvorov was literally a father to the soldiers. Not a great Emperor, or a commander, but a father. He took care of them, he never put himself above a simple man with a gun, he was not afraid to personally lead troops into battle. Napoleon, with all his good qualities as a leader, suffered from egoism, paranoia and incredible pride. A simple example. Napoleon, retreating from Moscow, fled, abandoning his soldiers to certain death, freezing and being captured. Suvorov preferred suicide, crossing the impassable and unknown Alps, in incredible frost in summer uniform, under constant attacks of the enemy, but did not abandon his "miracle heroes". This crossing then cost him his life and he knew it. But he did not flee.
@@archivesoffantasy5560 In general, Napoleon is certainly more important for the world. He is a great reformer, politician, harbinger of the era of capitalism. But on the battlefield, he is no match for Suvorov. Only after learning WHO is leading them into the attack, Russian soldiers will put the devil himself on a bayonet, but they will not lose. Especially on their own land, where the Russian man has always been invincible.
@@archivesoffantasy5560 That's true. It's a pity we'll never see this again ( Because Kutuzov, although he was perhaps no less an outstanding commander, in many ways (including battle tactics) he was literally the opposite of his teacher. Borodino was already the most terrible battle in world history, up until the Battle of Stalingrad, and if Napoleon and Suvorov had clashed there... Hmm. The field probably wouldn't have come back to life to this day.
Bro came, humbled Nations, forged his empire, conquered, clapped basically almost everyone in Europe, Made laws which some are still using today. And United Europe..... Against him. Bro was literally in a constant 1v5, and still kept his Empire going for some time.
