Cette nouvelle génération de produits doit être développée le plus rapidement possible, notamment en raison de la nécessité de se déplacer et de fonctionner plus rapidement, de nécessiter moins de conduite (peut être actionnée à distance par les exploitants d'avions et de navires), d'être plus petite (facilement transportable) et de transporter un grand nombre de personnes. Dans le même temps, la menace que représente le nombre de drones doit être prise en compte. La capacité de production annuelle de cette génération de produits doit être portée à 200-400 unités par an pour faire face aux éventuelles commandes à l'exportation dans les prochaines années.
To all the archer or pzh fanboys : good systems, but overengineered. Caesar is a good mix of technology and simplicity, which is always good and less expensive
So what is the point of this automation when 6 crew are outside and you got gazillion of stupid parts to be folded around. I tell you what: this system was to increase TIME of sustained fire in Africa agains Bedouins.
Amazing system, but in my opinion the reloader articulated arm is the obvious choke point in this system. It looks very prone to failure. At least, when it breaks, a human can move the shell...
I said it in the original video and I say it now: NATO cannot beat Russia. There is a problem in the premise of the video. RF is not a little boy with a toy tank or goat shepherds. Russia know that he must be prepared.
@@joegattog6695 How badly your comment has aged. Russia wanted to wear down NATO, which is no longer going to give aid to Ukraine. And NATO is falling.
@@nuribanconstantino2012nato can't beat russia? In what sense? Conventionally it is far superior. It has a bigger population, bigger economy. It could beat russia to the ground. It is a different story, that the west knows that russia -even though falsely claiming gigantic numbers- has nukes and can cause serious damage, but NATO could wipe out Russia easily. So to sum it up, NATO is stronger, but not interested in your drama.
@@joegattog6695 Russia arrived on the outskirts of kyiv in February 2022, made an agreement with the Ukrainians and withdrew. The Ukrainian government did not fulfill its obligations, forced by NATO, Russia dedicated itself to spending Ukraine and NATO that gives it supplies. It also killed a million Ukrainian combatants and several NATO officers, to the point where they had to disguise their casualties as accidents in the USA, like those who were burned in a road "accident", or that officer who crashed in an airplane or something. .
@@janoskovacs9406 In the military sense. The largest population does not matter much, if it is by military, currently it is solved with explosives, just like in Ukraine. And I couldn't stand the social protests over the casualties either. Economy? Most of NATO's economy is made of paper, they are banks, they even have a hard time producing weapons to replace the ones they sent to Ukraine. If you take a NATO country and put the sanctions on it that they put on Russia, it won't last a month without collapsing, Italy won't last a week. NATO is basically the USA, which has its power distributed around the world, it is designed to defeat shepherds and peasants.
Надо высадить морпехов армии РФ в Нюёрке и потрулировать Нюёрк и. т. д. от террористов. Если офицеры армии США спросят на каком основании морпехи армии России в Америке сказать у нас есть информация и предьявить приказ Шойгу а сами быстренько возмём под охрану месторождения полезных ископаемых в США. Армия США Морпехи всегда так делают. И мы сможем во славу Божию. Помолимся. Бойцы посты выставили. По пентагону фаер.
This was only a slow exercise. IRL combat one can deploy it in 30 seconds and be on the wheels again within a minute. We (Denmark) send all 19 we had to Ukraine. I sincerely hope they make good use of them down there. :) Slava Ukraini...!
