after explosion fps level it's complicated on this game already that you are with the executable of the game in 32 bits despite with this config of the time more than the engine is the cryengine 1.0 (crisys 2007 it is the 2.0) and no the dunia 1.0 which came on facry 2 besides the dunia is based on the cryengine and then was used on all the far cry parts after game version 1.40 for 32bits and 1.32 for 64bits
14900K adds 4 E-cores that are mostly useless unless your PC is production oriented. You’ll be regulating and undervolting these chips anyway if you don’t want a nuclear reactor in your house, so the higher clock speeds it brings are also useless. I dropped mine by 300MHz (from 5.6 to 5.3 on P-cores; default on E-cores) and power draw went down from 300W to 140W under full load with temperatures dropping from 90°C or so to 70°C at highest at safe 1.3 volts. All this while losing not even 2-3% of performance. I can live with that. For this CPU to run at stable 5.6GHz all-core turbo, it required 1.5 volts, and was crashing at 1.45 volts constantly. It did 5.5GHz on P-cores at 1.45, but the temperatures and power draw were still too high for my taste. I like my PC silent and stable.
There is DL scaling and legacy scaling. Legacy scaling uses full-fledged target resolution, while DL scaling uses some shenanigans to help with performance. What you're seeing for 8K and 16K is 4K legacy scaling with supersampling from the game on top of it which results in true 8K and 16K resolutions. So, 4K x 2 = 8K; 4K x 4 = 16K.
Just do it and don’t look back, you’ll be glad you did. You already missed an upgrade cycle in there, so this is going to be a huge difference for you.
@@calypsobenchmarkshow much of fps jump would going from extreme to ultra be? And I heard image quality from those two presets are minor. Honestly is that true?
128gb ram wtf for what bro you must be using for work or something 128 for gaming it's pretty to much i mean so much 32gb is enough for 2023 2024 games or sometimes 64gb
soo like 3%of the world has over 64gb of ram so 128 is huh are u bad at math?!!?? with 157 subs i would assume you are because 32 is MORE then enough for 90% of video editors/ gamers.. i am drunk but is a video withe buget gpu from 2028 being used when most computer ram was 8-16 ny huge margins and 32 was rare even fore ppl who edit things imma just thumbs down and block the channle this is a homeless person going to outback stake house.... im not wrong look at the steam deack hardware survey 8gb of system ram is kinda highs 16 is king and 32 is RARE!?!?!?!!? so 64 fir pc proffetionals is kinda high so this his a wtfx 10 x idc this pc has a ram cost more then the ENTIRE ps5/xbox onex aka a entire pc with a contorler.. lit this is 142bg or ram running a ps5 that runs really well with 16....total...
@simlife445 It's bold of you to assume that anyone has to justify anything to anyone these days. This is a GPU benchmark showing what it can do in a scenario where it's not bottlenecked by anything. You wouldn't want to test what a certain GPU can do in a CPU-bottlenecked scenario. I know you don't want to hear this but no one gaming on a PC should be on less than 32GB of RAM at the moment and 64GB isn't a stretch either, and it surely isn't enough for any "serious" work on a PC. Trust me, I have 256GB of RAM currently with Intel Core i9-14900K in my workstation and while it's kind of an overkill at the moment - I don't want to mix and match my RAM in the future so I buy all the RAM I'll ever need right away - and 99% of the time during my work hours the machine is at over 60% RAM usage, so, over the 128GB this test bench has. No, 64GB isn't enough for what I do, and I cycle through my machines once I build a new one for my work once the current doesn't do the job. Money isn't an issue for me thankfully. The reason I relegated this machine I'm recording benchmarks on now to a "have fun" piece of kit is that I got something better for my work environment at a decent price, even though I built it recently and even then 128GB RAM wasn't enough, so I put in 256GB in the new build. That's why I put 64GB of RAM in my Core i7-10700K build I used before here on the channel, it was a workstation that was relegated to a fun PC and is now used in a storage PC. There comes a point in your life - if PC hardware is used for more than casual gaming - when you just don't care and want your hardware when you say: "Jump." it asks you back: "How high?" instead of "I can't do it, there are limitations." And, while I understand what you're saying, this is a pure GPU benchmark to see what the GPU can do and nothing else.
