In free version, you can use "Transcript-based editing'' feature, it also turn your video into a transcript and signifies any pauses in your video. However, it doesn't automatically detect repeats and filler words, you still need to delete them manually based on the transcript. Anyway, it takes less time than our normal editing process.
Humanity will be replaced. Jobs will be lost. I love technology but AI is something we should never create. Millions will lose their jobs and poverty and homelessness will be out of control.
What I find most interesting in that these AIs are in some sense the 'ghost' or spirit of human beings: in that they are intelligences that have been developed by humans to interact in ways than humans consider desirable.
How long until we are cooked? You must be joking, we are screwed already, in fact we were behind in this a long time ago. The proof of this is in our face every day, and will become more evident each and every day from here on in.
It's a complex issue with no easy answers, but it's definitely something we need to think about as this technology develops. Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
@@aifire.official Do you mean women or AI? Artificial intelligence and the underlying technologies for LLMs like transformers I can understand, but women-that is indeed a complex issue.
Is it just me, or does she sound exactly like the AI from the film Her (2013)? Watch it if you haven't already. Imho, it's much better than Ex Machina. It might not be so much of a sci-fi anymore, I guess. Kinda scary, if you ask me.
@@aifire.official Thank you for your reply. I will probably get alot of heat for saying this, but i am going to say this anyway. What you are witnessing isn't anything new. It is old technology that has been passed down from the global elites to the rest of us which goes back to the early 1800s. Let me give you an example. The old Disney cartoons and movies which was produced in the 1950s and 1960s, many of them are A I productions. God only knows what version of A I they are using now.
Sure does not feel like any human around me. Feels much like false empathy and deeply interested conversation, too flirty, too kind. Just like when my wife flatters before asking for money. Any human adressing me that way would rise a big red flag.
That's an interesting take on the AI assistant. I can see why you might find the enthusiasm a little over the top, but I think it's interesting that the AI is trying to mimic human conversation so closely. It sounds like it's trying to build rapport with the person it's talking to. Thank you!
You have to understand that all the training is based on human input. It is like Propellerhead Reason, they use recordings of real instruments to make music. When the same sound is repeated, it becomes monotonous and muddy, if it was a 2D picture and a particular zones was all the same color - it will visually appear flat. Likewise, instead of pixels, when dealing with sounds, if all the sound is the same, it sounds flat and monotonous. Thereby, what you are detecting is an optimized system that organizes sound that is sliced into components that are then reassemble by the AI to make the illusion/sensation of a real voice. What you are experiencing is a believable sound because it does not repeat. It appears as if great effort has been used so that the voice is constantly dynamic in the sound that it outputs, so as not to repeat the same sound. One way you could test this is to have the AI repeat the same sound or same word and then count the number of repetitions before the same sound is used again. Without this attention to detail, AI is very quickly spotted as a repetition of believable patterns however because they have made it a high priority to not repeat the same output for the same sound, you get an organic feel to what is actually a very computerized task.
You're absolutely right that the technology relies on human input & avoids repetition to create a more natural sound. It's fascinating how far AI has come in replicating human speech, and it's exciting to think about where it might go from here.
I understand your concern about the potential dangers of training robots to be like humans. It's important to be aware of the potential risks of this technology, and to take steps to reduce those risks.
I understand your concern about the security of Gemini. In the video, I do not discuss the safety of Gemini in detail. However, I do mention that Gemini AI a powerful tool that can be used to improve productivity. I also mention that Gemini is still under development, and that the team is working on improving its safety and security. I hope this helps to answer your question. Please let me know if you have any other questions.
I appreciate your feedback. In the video, I discuss my personal experience with using Gemini and how it has helped improve my productivity. I also mention that Gemini is still under development and that the team is working on enhancing its features and functionality. Thanks for sharing your experience with Gemini 😊
Thanks for sharing your thoughts! I appreciate that. Actually, I could only share the idea and a short demo. I agree that creating a better, more fun, and interesting game will definitely take a longer time.
I recently watched a major youtube music commentator describe the current top 10 on Spotify as not even music. Some of them, honestly, sounded like the generations I make on ai that quickly end up in the trash because they sound like something musical, but definitely not the song I yet want to create.
That’s not “your own design”. That’s digital puke created from clever words. You had very little input in this “creation”. Thanks for helping ruin another outlet for people who actually create things.
@@aifire.official You're missing my point. Once record company execs get their grubby hands on AI that can reliably churn out hit songs, which means they will own 100% of the rights and 100% of the profits, the need for human musicians will be minimized. Technology will not overcome greed and the record execs' relentless search for the next hit pop song containing I-IV-V-vi chords. And frankly, that's the fault of unsophisticated music listeners who keep making hits out of the same songs, rearranged, over and over.
