Welcome to Sparrows news, your number one source for all technology and smartphone news. We're dedicated to giving you the very best gadget news focus on smartphone, wearable, television, pc and other gadgets.
Founded in November 2019 by Kamlesh Bhati, Sparrows news has come a long way from its beginnings in Pune, India. When Kamlesh Bhati first started out, his passion for technology drove him to do tons of research, so that Sparrows news can offer you best technology news as soon as possible and before anyone. We now serve our visitors all over the world, and are thrilled that we're able to turn our passion into own website.
We hope you enjoy our news website as much as we enjoy offering them to you. If you have any questions or comments, please don't hesitate to contact us.
The first real life photos from real users and not from the Photoshop experts in Vivo's marketing department look rather sobering, no better than any other high-end smartphone at the moment, and the focus of macro shots still has extreme errors.
The anount of spywares on this phone makes me avoiding it. This presentation might look glossy but the os itfels is 10000% spywares and its ui is ungly
So instead of improving Nebula software on all platforms like Android, Windows, IOS for proper 3DoF they went with another companion hardware! Why should I go with this when I can buy Viture Pro that can do exactly what this provide without extra hardware just with Spacewalker app? Xreal and Rokid are terrible when it comes to software.
So why can't this technology be automatically integrated into the glasses? Especially since they're already connected to a phone. The only thing you really need to transmit is the information about where you want the display to appear in the glasses. For example, there's anchor mode, which pins the display to a specific location in 3D space, like the top left corner, and keeps it there. Then there's follow mode, where the display moves with your gaze. Why can't these modes be built directly into the glasses? Why does it need a separate device to control it? It seems like something that could be easily set up with software, or even through the existing phone app.
Weight, heat, and battery. That's why all the HD resolution AR-glasses companies offload to a "puck"/2nd device. Battery tech isn't there yet for lightweight high-resolution glasses-style devices. That's why Apple held off going straight to glasses. They're waiting for the new battery tech to make more than 40mins to 2hrs use at a time possible with the above considerations.
Because it would make the glasses much bigger. You can already use your phone for most of this functionality, but this adds some benefits like a 2nd USB C port, 3D camera and several other things.
In vain! I needed a compact device, not just another smartphone. Stereo video also makes little sense, I won’t shoot with it, because I have a DJI Osmo Pocket 3 - with excellent stabilization and quality, and a flying camera - Hover X1.
So because you don't need it, it makes no sense to have a device that can do it? I also have a DJI Osmo Pocket 3, can you let me know where the 3d button is on it?
@@lemster101, You probably have no shooting experience, otherwise you would know that the most important thing is good stabilization, which only the DJI Osmo Pocket 3 has. This camera also has good other shooting parameters. In general, I meant that I would prefer a smooth HDR picture from this camera than 3D from a smartphone camera. I have an Xreal Air 2 Pro and I rarely watch anything in 3D with them, it’s not so impressive that I need to sacrifice anything. Definitely not the image quality. You won’t be able to share your 3D footage with anyone, and this is also important. Hover X1 can provide views that no other camera can provide. So, when traveling, I definitely wouldn’t shoot with the XREAL Beam Pro! Due to poor quality, and it is extremely inconvenient to use - to hold and control Perhaps if XREAL could negotiate for DJI released firmware for Osmo Pocket 3, which would synchronize 2 cameras for shooting in 3D (this is possible), then this would be the best solution on the market! This kind of 3D would make sense!
@@lemster101, I wrote "and it is extremely inconvenient to use - to hold and control". And you -“let’s make it even more complicated! Let it be heavier and no longer fit in your pocket. So that you need a bag for this. And instead of enjoying the journey, you have to assemble/disassemble this structure” Brava! I have a fantasy today. You learn my masterpiece Absurd.
