That is very scientifically inaccurate appearance wise. Neanderthals were larger, had a far more dense and big bone mass built for muscles that were strong for hunting. They were able to run way faster, and they group hunted like predatory animal species. Their skin was thick, leathery, and super dark, similar to gorilla skin. They also had a far stronger and wider jaw and a larger skull/brain. They took on bears and lions. They hunted humans, ate the men, and forcibly took the women. They were at war with one another for over 100,000 years. The interspecies breeding is what killed them off, as boys and girls had far different life expectancy unlike our relatives the homo-sapiens, die to a neanderthal genome flaw. Modern humans have a very small percentage of neanderthal traits still due to this! Depending on the evolutionary psych opinion, some of them think the human fear of the dark still stems from that. Seeing them as a known danger yes, but being similar to them... that seems highly unlikely. 😅
cats are domesticated. my evidence is a feral cat abandoned her kitten in my yard, and when I went out there and said "hey, buddy! it's gonna be alright!", said kitten trundled towards me, started purring the moment I picked him up, and has now been my buddy for six years.
i have a question pertaining to this myth and related ones about the dog in the underworld: apparently europeans and asians (which includes native americans ancestors) split around 41,000 years ago, aka before the domestication of the dog in europe. how did these cultures which by that time were completely separate form the same/similar mythology about dogs when the timeline is so iffy? it’s just the geographic area is so vast i find it hard to imagine it spread through contact, especially considering how vital this mythical dog is to a lot of cultures perception of the underworld
I've seen archeologists getting stone from ancient sites like the grimes graves in England or the flintmine in pressigny france. The dude wrote he even took over one ton of flint from there. Me, a normal person is in most cases not even allowed to be at those sites, instead i take long journeys to search for flint or pay good prices. So i can see why some "normal person" knappers have mixed feelings about some experimental archeologists. But this people believing in giants and the bible while making handaxes are the pinnacle of ignorance. Like what do they think this handaxes and this fine daggers are both 6000 years old ?
OK, I know I'm a couple years late, but in the time frame of archeology, this comment is practically moments after the vid was posted. Anyway, the problem with the arrows impacting to the right is and issue of arrow spine. The more weight you put on the front of the arrow, the weaker the shaft becomes. You can read up on arrow spine and point weight and you'll figure it out real quick.
Loved this ep!! Bill Lawrence (the creator of scrubs) said some of the characters were based on real people that he is actually friends with and they agreed to let Bill use some of their stories as long as they portrayed actual and accurate medical practices specifically because it had such goofy moments. The real JD was on the set most of the time overseeing everything in that regard.
I didn't realise you're the same guy I follow on insta until I saw the logo of your channel. You're way more likeable in this video than the insta channel. I think you're right, insta requires you to stick to one format, definitely found myself ignoring the insta content, because flicking from one 20 second video to the next with a totally different theme will never compete on your specific page vs all of insta fyp. I much prefer your youtube channel it turns out.
Starting a talk with claims of "do/don't believe [this]" from a position of authority with no evidence just a community or personal belief, is just as bad as any other fairytale told by people who weren't there.
The theory that early humans brought wolf pups home and raised them is more plausible because wolves are territorial animals, and their dens are usually far from human settlements. When adult wolves approached humans for food, their pups were likely still in the wild. Domestication through raising pups would have allowed humans to bond with them at a young, impressionable age, making the process more feasible than taming adult wolves. This approach aligns better with both wolf behavior and the practicalities of early human society.
It would be actually the opposite, there being so few humans, living in a group of humans that all look the same because there isn't a big pool of genes and suddenly meeting other humans with characteristics so different from our own would be like meeting a new species.
Minute man: Is my mic working? *tap tap tap* Stefani: yes….. is my mic working? *tap tap tap* Me: LOL, how else would y’all hear each others questions?
I could probably listen to you guys doing a podcast/live together once a month to share cool and interesting articles on new studies, new finds, or new interpretations you found over the time, and just let yourselves organically go off on side quests from those articles.
So it's 3 weeks later and this video gets suggested to me......of course if the title was Mammoth video😉 with an excavation of a Mammoth😉 I'm sure it would have been suggested to me sooner 😜
Ok. So, you made up stuff, had a guy draw it and now are using this fantasy to reinforce your fantasy civilization. These people need to be ridiculed by everyone constantly.
Wow when I saw this video was 58 minutes long I was like "there's no way Im gonna watch all of it" but then by the last 10 minutes of it I was like "no, wait, I need MORE" thank you for uploading this so we can all see and learn from it
Presents himself as some sort of expert on Rome. Doesn't like Italy. Doesn't even study Latin "because someone else can translate all the source material." *LOUD BUZZER SOUND* Wrong! Next! The real experts are those "someone else's." You're so much better than this jackass, David. I'm sorry you had to spend 2 hours with him. Glad I didn't. I listened to about half an hour. Up to the part where he mentioned that "someone else" can translate all the Latin. *LOUD BUZZER NOISE* Wrong! Next!
I call b.s. on this. Every native american tribe considered their tribe as being "the people." One sees something very similar in recent historical, tribal middle east as well. Everyone ouside of one's own tribe was something less than human, even expendable and "dirty." This type of tribalism MUST have been the natural order of prehistoric earth. We know for a fact that, despite the interbreeding that occured, Neanderthals were generally made up of small, often incestuous, family tribes. Ancient hominids may have seen each other as being similar, but they most certainly were the original tribal animals that we are today. Our racism springs from our predudicial, descriminating minds. This kid does not know what he's talking about. Rousseu and all of his talk about the "Noble Savage" was incredibly naive. Homosapiens were the last hominid standing after hundreds of thousands of years of inter-species' competition.
You say you've got a Master's but not a Doctorate but people still call you "Doctor" but you're not going to stop them. Did the movie "The King's English" teach you nothing? Colin Firth called Geoffrey Rush "Doctor" and then got very, very angry when he found out that Geoffrey Rush had no doctorate. And Colin was the King of England, not the very first guy you want to be angry at you. Yeah, everything worked out fine, but almost not!
Not for me, but I hope people take you up on this! Having their 'research paper' be a script/turned into a video is an amazing idea, the information gets out there, they get credit, and you get content. Big brain idea for sure.
