Please cut the carbs. Can’t take on your intelligent points if you are presenting health ignorance. Trying not to be rude but failing 😂 yeah maybe I’m drunk! But slim ..for now .. oh skeletons are slim .. maybe chub is life, 🙂🙂who knows? We are all skinny when we die.. unless we are leaving Burger King and get T-boned! Just look after yourself ok. PO! That’s peace out, not P.off 😎 You can do that if you want to. I am now, to the pub. W to ya mama
I am so thankful for the both of you. I trained as a counselor, ending my counseling career focusing on psychometric evaluation. My curiosity led me to pursue an independent study of physics beyond my 2 semesters in university. It is wonderful to have found a discussion of mind and physics. These video discussions have added to my understanding as I read The Matter with Things. My library is growing with the addition of several books you have mentioned.
With repsect to the three gentlemen philosherps... 🙏🏼 Due to English limitation, I've tried my best to understand the discussion you made here, for care and love we all bound as the same race of humanity, I thus, hope little of my thought and understanding here could be reached out to all of you there. My anticipated thought to the discussion in regard to Metac Crisis: About the Master &Emissary, both the master and the emissary goes by allegory is like two sides of the same bowl, hence the blame is not to be taken by anyone. However, the responsibility to hold shall not be tremendously the same. Why not the same responsibility? This, I mean one shall see that if one puts food on a face-board of that bowl, one will see that the fate of the food will be likely remain naturally more in a beautiful, peaceful, delightful, and tasteful manner by the way the food is made into being. On the other other hand, if one turns the face-board of the bowl upside-down and place the same food (people&nature) on that tail of that same bowl, one will certainly see that the fate of the food changes into ugly, untidy, unpeaceful, unsatisfied and therefore disgusting in out-look. This parable should only reflect the situation possible of our world in a simple way as for a clear simple mind to see, a complicated mind will see things differently as to why « We are in such a messy world now? » Despite this parable trend for us to speculate together seriously, one shall remind oneself constantly to look wholly consciously that both sides of the bowl-board is just one reality of the bowl, not as a separated part. For this truth, moral blame or scorn of hatred or punishment onto anyone must not take place at all cos it is the art of one’s own arrangement only. This rhetorical analogy shall go the same way to our world, and I personally see that. For that reason, we shall together realize that: we as the observer is not different from the thing we observed, we are indeed just one fact of truth, meaning if the observer is a partial entity to observe; the board-bowl therefore which is being observed by the entity will be seen partially too either the observer see the face of the bowl or the tail-bottom of it according to that observer since he is no different from the thing that is being observed. If we like to go into this inquiry together to seek way for dealing with suffering of fragility or metac crisis of our world, this of course, has to go seriously carefully compassionately with a mind that is not fragile. If we could go into that quality as holistic consciously observer together, that perhaps there comes a wholistic practical strategy of inclusiveness to harm no one or causes any side-effect at all. This is what I would like to share as much I can do from understanding the summary concern made from that discussion of the three philosophers there....🙏🌏 I hope my English could make sense well to all of you with wholeheartedly regard from me. Thanks you for the love and the effort you all have stood for humanity and Mother Earth...🙏🌏🌺❤️⚖️💪 “ The master&Emissary, holds the same responsibility for the failure of civilization because both are just one in truth, but in practicality of moving-truth tactically are not the same, quote! So, the question lies in there “The Oneness”, how can both parties become one in real sense of a living world? This question shall be totally again back to dependency of quality of such mind from the questioner. If the questioner’s mind is such at ease, peace, and quite, there lies the answer of what to do right actions to the world.
The autistic brain shows more symmetry between the two hemispheres than a neurotypical brain, apparently. Very strange that Dr. Mcgilchrist is characterizing it by an outdated sterotype.
