I'm not feeling confident with that Huawei equipment given their horridious track record of IP thief & low quality. Everytime see Huawei, I think of 'avoid'.
Here in Switzerland many rural places have FttS, and last mile still copper. So g.Fast is still prevalent. We're talking sub 500m. In the Alps and stuff. Has to do with our national provider and the fiber standard they chose. In the cities you have FttH.
Thank you for the informative introduction to Huawei GPON technology! It was conducive. Looking forward to more educational videos about optical communication products.🥰
Hmm idk man seems very bias. The west with exactly the paramount of human rights or privacy. Seems kind of hypocritical. Feel that the West is just trying to keep its place as the only in that ball game. Hard to know who to believe when media of all kind has incestual ties to governments and corporations. Wat a world we live in.
My copper landline must be very short because I'm getting the full optic fiber 1,000 Mb/s speeds over G.fast in my condo and the copper landlines hook into the fiber from the condo utility room.
Here in Australia, FTTH is universally known as FTTP and is currently being offered in a lot of areas as a free upgrade by the Government owned NBN-National Broadband Network. The reason for this free upgrade must be because of the rapidly encroaching Starlink and 5G home internet services which are coming onto the market. NBN’s FTTP though, is the only fixed-line service using fibre. No doubt, as time marches and given the billions in investment dollars, NBN will come up with something further to counter these competitors.
As I was watching them build out the GPON network in my area I researched all of this. I was struck by how complicated the actual network must look in a rural area, I know where the splitters are but properties are spread very thin so if you look at the telephone (now fibre, I guess) poles you can see all the individual cables, some travelling quite some distance from the splitters. From there there are occasional port blocks on poles particularly where there's a cluster of properties, they seem to use 4 port versions here but I assume in urban areas they are larger but each port is fed by an individual cable from the splitter, in some parts the cable strung between poles appears thicker so I assume they bundle multiple fibres? not sure. I'm not sure where the OLT is but I assume it is in the old telephone exchange buildings, many miles away in the case of rural fibre. It works beautifully though, a gigabit to a farm is pretty impressive and super reliable.
Depends. If there was a CO close by, the OLT could be inside in an environment proof cabinet. Outside, you don't have to pay for cooling. The max distance is 17km or 10miles. The more you split, the less the distance. Some of the splits are in line and unbalanced. So I can have a 1:2 split feeding a 1:8 split. The one side continues down the street and the 1:8 split feeds businesses with more splits on the end. Cable providers use the exact same large OLTs but they can also use OLCs which are mini clamshells that look like regular cable amps with fibre in and fibre out. The OLC can run on the same power the coaxial has on it, allowing for using an existng network with backup power. Everything is spliced and the splitters are the size of cigarettes or a few stacked credit cards depending on where they are.
For the 50 cent army please try some original responses instead of: What about Apple, Google, the USA, the "West" etc. The CIA Capitalist/imperialist running dog
For the 50 cent army please try some original responses instead of: What about Apple, Google, the USA, the "West" etc. The CIA Capitalist/imperialist running dog
For the 50 cent army please try some original responses instead of: What about Apple, Google, the USA, the "West" etc. The CIA Capitalist/imperialist running dog
For the 50 cent army please try some original responses instead of: What about Apple, Google, the USA, the "West" etc. The CIA Capitalist/imperialist running dog
The success is certainly not due to the Western World, who accused the Chinese of spying through these phones. Where it has been proven many times what the Western governments do to their own citizens through the mobile phones such as Apple and other makes that are sold on the western markets., spy,spy, and more spying!!
But Apple and Google don't need to be forced to spy for the US Government, they do it willingly, because Globalist corporations ARE the US Government. So don't think that by not using Huawei, you are free from being spied on. Personally, as an Australian, I won't use any phone other than a Huawei, because the device is not locked into Apple or Google's system. Also its got the best cameras on any Phone. So why did USA ban Huawei? for spying? NO, it was because Huawei were about to become the best tech company in the world, having just outsold Apple and were about to beat Samsung. That's why the ban. The ban was put into place immediately Huawei became number one. Corporate greed. If the USA cant be number one by fair trading, they will just use dirty tactics. If it was truly about the Chinese govt spying on the west, you don't think that the Chinese govt cant just use any or all of the other Chinese tech companies to do that? They only can force Huawei to spy for them?
Fine sounding rhetoric about western democracies, especially the USA, but unfortunately its only pure fiction. The western democracies are all run totally by privately owned global Corporations, who dictate to the visible puppet government. So you have a façade that seems like democratic freedom, but its just illusionary. Recent events have made this abundantly clear. Politicians and even Presidents are being exposed as criminals by independent investigative journalists and yet not a single conviction is recorded. So fake democracies are really no different than China, but actually the USA is far worse, because its all lied about, and they are always embarking on international terrorism with their policy of constant war. I don't see China doing that. China always look for a peaceful negotiation but USA invariably provoke and are aggressors.
Its crazy that they think anyone will believe that crazy propaganda. Like everyone will accept that idea we are misunderstanding them, and their actions. 😂😂😂
I remember listening to the British politician who negotiated the break off of HONG Kong. When talking to the Chinese opposite he realized pretty quickly that this guy did not understand what he meant by "rule of law ". He kind of figured HK was doomed right from the get go but could do nothing about it. Chinese system is corrupt from start to finish.
G.fast is all about sweating copper for as long as possible. Only available to those who already have 70-80Mbps anyway so most people won't be interested. I do hate how Openreach pissed about working on this instead of just getting on with fibre.
I work with copper every day as a field tech for the largest ISP in my country. I can tell that this is a bad idea. We have so many faulty connections especially in old buildings, electromagnetic interference from hell and sometimes customers where there have been 7 or more technicians on site, to the point where everything from the port to the router was replaced (seriously for up to 3 times...), all test results look great and still the d* thing keeps losing connection for some weird reason. Of course this is only a small percentage of overall customers but my recommendation would be to only use higher than 35 Mhz g.fast in an environment with in building telephone wiring that is less than 10 years old and better replace old telephone cables entirely. And there we have the problem. Then one could simply pull fiber or Cat7.
The OLT shown in this video is a Huawei MA5800 X17 series? This would mean that the line cards can be either 1Gig or 10Gig ports interchangeably. Setting up your fiber network with GPON is only one of the options on how to form the (telecom)network. I work with the same OLT's but we simply use Point-to-Point connectivity between OLT's and home addresses. Each (duplex) optic provisions 2 separate addresses in our design. Btw, the required dBm values might differ with the use of different SFP's. Just thought it would be interesting to add this comment to your well-explained video. Oh and one more thing, the line cards are the second most expensive thing in the chassis, the supervisor cards are even worse when it comes down to economics. :) Just wanted to mention that.
We have just had fibre laid where I live, an alt network and also openreach and to be honest I am not that interested, I get 36Mb/s on FTTc and it does what I need, but I expect at some point I am going to get harassed by my provider to change to FTTP. If someone is going to make use of the extra speed and want to pay extra for it then fine, but some of us don't want to pay any more.
It's far more reliable than FTTC and the bandwidth works better for families or larger downloads. The price should be the same, so it's a no brainer really.
@@portman8909 My FTTC was reliable and i only had one major problem in the 9 years I know you are talking about the network as a whole and not just one person. As I said before, I really had no interest in FTTP and was not looking at chaging. My contract was cokming to the end a couple of months ago and the ISP I was with would not give me a decent offer on FTTC, they wanted me to change to FTTP, which I did not want to do. Anyway an Alt net sent me an offer of 500Mb/s for £24 a month, whihc was about the same as I was originally paying for FTTC , also only a 12 month contract, others are 24 and i will not go into a 24 month contract. So in the end due mainly to price I bit the bullet and decided that if I have to change to FTTP then I may as well go with a network that is more advanced than Open reach. So I went with the Alt net a couple o months ago but going from 36Mb/s to 500Mb/s have made little difference to be honest. Streaming is still the same, the only time i notice any difference is when I download some files on the computer or upload them, as I get 500Mb/s up and down. But I don't do that very often these days. At the end of the contract I will lower the speed to 150Mb/s unless they give me a good price to stay as io am.
