Stop parotting and think on your own. Complex numbers is fake invented math because (1) the definition of a complex number contradicts to the laws of formal logic, because this definition is the union of two contradictory concepts: the concept of a real number and the concept of a non-real (imaginary) number-an image. The concepts of a real number and a non-real (imaginary) number are in logical relation of contradiction: the essential feature of one concept completely negates the essential feature of another concept. These concepts have no common feature (i.e. these concepts have nothing in common with each other), therefore one cannot compare these concepts with each other. Consequently, the concepts of a real number and a non-real (imaginary) number cannot be united and contained in the definition of a complex number. The concept of a complex number is a gross formal-logical error; (2) the real part of a complex number is the result of a measurement. But the non-real (imaginary) part of a complex number is not the result of a measurement. The non-real (imaginary) part is a meaningless symbol, because the mathematical (quantitative) operation of multiplication of a real number by a meaningless symbol is a meaningless operation. This means that the theory of complex number is not a correct method of calculation. Consequently, mathematical (quantitative) operations on meaningless symbols are a gross formal-logical error; (3) a complex number cannot be represented (interpreted) in the Cartesian geometric coordinate system, because the Cartesian coordinate system is a system of two identical scales (rulers). The standard geometric representation (interpretation) of a complex number leads to the logical contradictions if the scales (rulers) are not identical. This means that the scale of non-real (imaginary) numbers cannot exist in the Cartesian geometric coordinate system.
Wow - so clear, and so much passion! From the video, I believe you consider entanglement to be synonymous with superposition? There is no qubit correlation without entanglement, so therefore no encoding of the ‘problem’ in the qubits. So the qubits are encoded, entangled, superimposed, in the Hadamard stage? Are you familiar with Fourier epicycles? Do you think looking at this process using the Argonne diagram and Fourier epicycles might clarify these steps? Thank you so much!
Thank you for the great explanation. I made a mobile phone app realizing Shor's algorithm based on this lecture. I gained a deeper understanding of Shor's Algorithm using this app, even though it is for small integers.
I see what you are doing here and I think this is amazing. You really start from the ground up. For anybody who came this far I can say: Guys, if you are looking for a guide into quantum physics without much experience in abstract math, then you found it. Just make sure to pay attention.
