Good and quality content of Flight Simulation - that's what I'm focusing at here on my channel. My goal is to make you enjoy my way how I see the sense of beauty and editing at it's finest. With highest professionalism as possible I want that this content reaches as more as possible people out there like you :) You want it too? Support me with a like, subscribe not to miss another such masterpieces as these and share it to get this project more attention.
Interested in taking part in our movie projects and want to know more? Visit our Discord Server: discord.gg/7MdYNFE
The only unrealistic thing here is engines,in real life there were CFM56, while in Infinite Flight there are V2500, but it’s just simulator’s restrictions.
Thank you so much for your feedback! I'm not quite able to take partnership projects in Infinite Flight anymore but I can eventually give some advices if needed. I saw the trailer and it's pretty good!
RednoseHeavy Honestly you make some of the best content I have ever seen. I really don’t like how people make infinite flight livestream with 0 effort and they get 400 subs just from self promoting. You really deserve more subs!
@@rotateaviationyt Thank you Rotate, I put my efforts more into quality than quantity. But this can't be the option for long-term ambitions after all. Soon the content on this channel will become more recognizable, vivid and diverse, large changes will follow. But don't worry, the movie projects will stay how they are and will improve in the future!
It did NOT stall. That was alpha Max. With no thrust or speed the nose was high but it descended. That's normal on every landing. But obviously much worse at Alpha Max. This was not a stall.
The aircraft could not produce enough thrust on the second approach and therefore stalled losing the needed drag in the air. This is how I interpreted the situation however of course I may be wrong here. Thank you for your addition / correction my friend, I think it will help us to understand the event better.
@@rednoseheavy6304 this video does not depict a stall. It depicts maximum angle of attack prior to stall and the Airbus fly by wire maintaining exactly that position to the point of the crash. Pitch up and descending does not equal stall. Every landing in an Airbus is nose up and descending. We are about 4-6° nose up and descending at 3° on a glideslope. That's 7-9° AOA. They maintained a very high AOA that is unusual but this isn't stalling. 7000 hours in this aircraft. I hope this helps man and I appreciate you being open to correction. The Airbus did it's job. It's unfortunate the pilots couldn't make use of the Airbus protecting them. If they'd aimed for a field likely everyone would be alive or far less injuries but they were so fixated on the runway they couldn't see anything else, no doubt. I don't judge them for it. It's just unfortunate. I was always a big "if it isn't Boeing I'm not going" guy but after being typed and flying the Airbus after a year or so I really began to appreciate what it's doing for me when all systems are normal. And in this accident I appreciate it even more: both engines were failed yet they had enough computers and flight controls to maintain normal law which makes stalling impossible (minus some specifics) if everything else is working. If the Airbus had stalled like AF447 then no one would have lived. I have the video on that, the actual FDR. Feel free to check it out.
Thank you so much for your rating! However I would really appreciate if there's more context to what exactly you don't like. This will surely help me to improve! 😄
Thank you so much for attending to the Premiere guys and witness the channel trailer for the first time in live. I hope we will have more such nice moments together!
Thank you so much for the feedback! I would really like to! Depends of course how far the FlightFactor model will satisfy me with the level of detail and flight model...
