MySec.TV - produced by MySecurity Media, delivers news and interviews from across our range of security and technology channels, including the MySecurity Marketplace, Cyber Risk Leaders Magazine, Asia Pacific Security Magazine, Australian Cyber Security Magazine, DRASTICnews, Australia in Space Magazine and much more...
satellite hacking techniques? That's quite a bold statement! I'm not buying it. Sounds like someone's exaggerating their expertise and trying to sound impressive. If you're truly an expert in satellite hacking, where's the proof? Show us the poc, the article, or even a tweet ? Otherwise, it's just empty claims and a whole lot of hot air. Scammer alert! This guy also claimed to hack a smart TV for once in a hotel, where later on his own colleague claimed that it was his smart tv and raspberry pi device and he just came to his room and took this photo of TV with raspberry pi attached. I was speaker at same conf. He is full package 😂 he won't stop
There should be a national security licence so professional security officers can work anywhere in Australia without going through the mutual recognition of your licence in each separate state and territory.
Appreciate that you guys at least want peace. But some food for thoughts from someone who has had the privilege to learn more than just one cultural perspective... The Western analysis is frequently full of Western projections and delusional image of its own "moral goodness" out to "save the world". The fear of Chinese dominance is a projection of what the West would do if it was in China's position. The Anglo-European "democracies" were built on and maintained by tyranny over other populations, and frequently aren't even all inclusive domestically. The way the Global North impose its own worldview and ideology on everyone, judging those who are different as inferior/evil and therefore fair game for meddling, coups, invasion, colonisation, or even ethnic cleansing, is way worse than the accusation levied against China's historically paternalistic attitude towards governance, i.e. Tiger Parenting on a national scale. But China at its previous height had the chance to invade, colonise or enslave Africa, but didn't. They visited east coast of Africa centuries ago, had a look, accepted some souvenir gifts, and went back to the comfort of their then more advanced civilisation. Just because the Global North really believes in winner takes all doesn't mean everyone else are equally greedy. Some actually do try to reign in the worst of human nature even if it's a constant struggle. Not everyone cynically gives up and indulge in insatiable greed while rationalising away the bad behaviour with grand words and self-delusions. Learn how to share power and respect other civilisations' unique circumstances, needs, perspectives, and contributions - just like rest of the world had to cope with alien Anglo-European culture imposed on them. China is not expecting Australia to adopt Chinese style governance. It's up to Australia if it wants to study what works for China and reflect whether there are any specific ideas, strategies, policies, and practices that can be ADAPTED to Australia's unique history, culture, and needs. It's what China did when they adapted the European ideas of "hey, even the peasants and plebs matter" and "hey, the scientific methods can really efficiently improve living standards". Learn from others without losing sight of yourself. As for Taiwan, the best outcome for the Taiwanese people is peaceful unification with China with as much autonomy as possible under the Chinese governance system - e.g. autonomous region or one country two system. Consider these facts: 1) 97% of Taiwanese are culturally and ethnically Chinese. Their chance of prosperity is higher within the Chinese sphere of influence. 2) Support for independence is not as strong as the Western media likes to paint it - only 28.6% of registered voters in 2024's presidential election voted for the pro-independence DPP, with 42.8% voted for status quo but improve relationship with China opposition parties, and 28.7% didn't bother to vote. And this is after decades of first anti-communist, then anti-China brainwashing. 3) Even amongst pro-independence supporters, the will to defend Taiwan with their own lives is low. Many say they'll emigrate if fighting starts - is Australia ready to take in Taiwanese refugees? Even the pro-independence president stashes his sons safely in the US. If they really are serious about Taiwanese independence, they would all be joining the military. Current military draft has only recently been raised back to 1 year duty from 4 months (under KMT it used to be 2 years). The attempt to replace the draft with professional soldiers has largely failed - not enough people want to join. And DPP spent way more on buying mostly useless old tech weapons from the US - paid for already but no delivery in sight - than it does on social welfare programs. Meanwhile, DPP neglected other vulnerable points in case of a blockade - things like energy, water, food. They also don't take care of their veterans and has a complicated relationship with the military - understandable given that many DPP supporters are families who were victims of KMT's anti-communist authoritarian rule in the decades after WWII. 4) Taiwan will not be able to pick up the island move away from China and its population will always have to deal with China. So while the Chinese still view Taiwanese as family and are willing to give perks, it's stupid to side with Western foreigners who are unlikely to risk their own lives to save the Taiwanese, nor can they easily tell Taiwanese apart from Chinese by look. 5) If DPP is so eager to desinocise Taiwan, why doesn't it ditch the Chinese langauge, customs, and return all the Chinese historical artifacts and gold + interest. 6) DPP is increasingly authoritarian while spinning itself as defender of democracy. Sounds familiar doesn't it. Even down to the technique of censorship, social harassment, economic and legal threats. They are corrupt as corrupt can be, yet they just locked up a popular opposition party presidential candidate on "corruption" charge while they "search for" (aka plant) evidence. Meanwhile all the alleged corruptions by the DPP have been buried, uninvestigated. So much for a "righteous democratic" Taiwan vs an "authoritarian" China. 7) Taiwanese are scared of China first and foremost because of brainwashing. DPP is still trying to scare Taiwanese away from visiting and learning about how China actually works, and accusing anyone saying anything nice about China as CPC stooges. How is that "freedom" and "democracy" when you can't learn the truth and judge for yourself whether / what you like or dislike about China. Previously it was just anti-communist brainwashing, now it's anti-China brainwashing - wanting to rewrite history and erase Taiwan's Chinese heritage. The only group that has any right to claim Taiwanese only heritage is the 3% indigenous people. Most Taiwanese just want a fair government that's not corrupt and will provide them with a safe environment and opportunities to lead a prosperous life. Most don't pay close attention to politics unless it negatively affects their everyday life. You even have voters who choose leader based on name recognition and look instead of policy positions that affect their lives. And in the past at least, voters could even be bought off cheapy by politicians at election time. Don't turn Taiwanese into cannon fodder for the West's vanity and inability to respect others. It's highly immoral.
I'm Terry Flanders from Investigaton systems daughter Rachel Flanders Jore. I've been trying to reach out to my father. I have kept quiet for him and my life isn't important?
This was terrible. They obviously don't want to market to Americans or they would have provided a fluent English speaker to present their product. This debacle is only exaggerated by the speaker using the non-word "um" ad nauseum. Simply terrible to listen to.
Pakistan's military, including its army, has historically held significant influence and power within the country. Several factors contribute to the perceived strength of Pakistan's security services: 1. **Size and Organization**: The Pakistan Army is one of the largest in the world in terms of active personnel. Its organizational structure and extensive training programs contribute to its effectiveness. 2. **Strategic Importance**: Pakistan is situated in a region of geopolitical significance, bordered by countries such as India, Afghanistan, and Iran. Its security services are tasked with safeguarding national interests, including territorial integrity and stability in the region. 3. **Counterterrorism Operations**: Pakistan has faced significant challenges from various terrorist groups operating within its borders. The military, particularly the army, has been actively engaged in counterterrorism operations, gaining valuable experience and expertise in asymmetric warfare. 4. **Modernization and Technology**: Pakistan has invested in modernizing its armed forces, including advancements in weaponry, surveillance technology, and intelligence capabilities. This focus on technological advancement enhances the effectiveness of its security services. 5. **Training and Discipline**: The Pakistan Military Academy in Kakul and other training institutions provide rigorous training to military personnel, emphasizing discipline, strategic thinking, and operational effectiveness. 6. **Strategic Alliances**: Pakistan has historically maintained close ties with countries like China and the United States, receiving military aid, training, and access to technology. These alliances have contributed to the professional development and capabilities of its security services. 7. **Nuclear Capability**: Pakistan is a nuclear-armed state, and its military is tasked with safeguarding its nuclear assets. This adds another layer of complexity to its security apparatus. 8. **Involvement in Civil Affairs**: The Pakistan Army has, at times, played a significant role in domestic politics and governance. Its involvement in civil affairs has allowed it to maintain a strong presence and influence within the country. However, it's essential to note that while the Pakistan Army is considered strong in certain aspects, challenges and criticisms exist, including concerns about civilian-military relations, human rights issues, and regional tensions.
Pakistan's military, including its army, has historically held significant influence and power within the country. Several factors contribute to the perceived strength of Pakistan's security services: 1. **Size and Organization**: The Pakistan Army is one of the largest in the world in terms of active personnel. Its organizational structure and extensive training programs contribute to its effectiveness. 2. **Strategic Importance**: Pakistan is situated in a region of geopolitical significance, bordered by countries such as India, Afghanistan, and Iran. Its security services are tasked with safeguarding national interests, including territorial integrity and stability in the region. 3. **Counterterrorism Operations**: Pakistan has faced significant challenges from various terrorist groups operating within its borders. The military, particularly the army, has been actively engaged in counterterrorism operations, gaining valuable experience and expertise in asymmetric warfare. 4. **Modernization and Technology**: Pakistan has invested in modernizing its armed forces, including advancements in weaponry, surveillance technology, and intelligence capabilities. This focus on technological advancement enhances the effectiveness of its security services. 5. **Training and Discipline**: The Pakistan Military Academy in Kakul and other training institutions provide rigorous training to military personnel, emphasizing discipline, strategic thinking, and operational effectiveness. 6. **Strategic Alliances**: Pakistan has historically maintained close ties with countries like China and the United States, receiving military aid, training, and access to technology. These alliances have contributed to the professional development and capabilities of its security services. 7. **Nuclear Capability**: Pakistan is a nuclear-armed state, and its military is tasked with safeguarding its nuclear assets. This adds another layer of complexity to its security apparatus. 8. **Involvement in Civil Affairs**: The Pakistan Army has, at times, played a significant role in domestic politics and governance. Its involvement in civil affairs has allowed it to maintain a strong presence and influence within the country. However, it's essential to note that while the Pakistan Army is considered strong in certain aspects, challenges and criticisms exist, including concerns about civilian-military relations, human rights issues, and regional tensions.
Pakistan's military, including its army, is known for its strength and capabilities in security services for several reasons: 1. **Historical Legacy**: The Pakistan Army has a long history of military involvement, dating back to the partition of British India in 1947. Over the decades, it has built a strong institutional framework, honed through various conflicts and operations. 2. **Strategic Importance**: Pakistan's geopolitical position in South Asia, sharing borders with India, Afghanistan, Iran, and China, has necessitated a robust military presence. This strategic position has led to a focus on security and defense. 3. **Professionalism and Training**: The Pakistan Army places a high emphasis on professionalism and training. Officers and soldiers undergo rigorous training programs, both domestically and through international collaborations, to develop skills in warfare, counter-terrorism, intelligence gathering, and peacekeeping. 4. **Modernization Efforts**: Despite economic challenges, Pakistan has consistently invested in modernizing its military equipment and infrastructure. This includes acquiring advanced weaponry, enhancing intelligence capabilities, and improving logistical support. 5. **Counter-terrorism Operations**: Pakistan has been actively involved in counter-terrorism operations, particularly in the volatile regions bordering Afghanistan. These experiences have provided valuable insights and operational expertise in dealing with insurgencies and asymmetric threats. 6. **Institutional Cohesion**: The Pakistan Army benefits from a strong sense of institutional cohesion and discipline. This allows for effective coordination among different branches of the military and other security agencies. 7. **International Partnerships**: Pakistan has cultivated strategic partnerships with various countries, including the United States, China, and Saudi Arabia, which have provided military aid, training, and technology transfers. 8. **Civil-Military Relations**: In Pakistan, the military plays a significant role in national security decision-making. While this has led to periods of military rule, it has also ensured that the military remains a powerful and influential institution in the country's governance and security affairs. These factors collectively contribute to the strength and effectiveness of Pakistan's security services, particularly its army, in safeguarding the nation's interests and maintaining stability within the region.
US and Australia agreed to a one-china accord where Taiwan is a part of sovereign China as a prerequisite to opening relations with the PRC. This is an internal civil war. Promises were made, including the withdrawal of US troops and nuclear missiles from Taiwan.
Western Rules-Based International Order = Rules-Based for the white people by the white people and of the white people. As a non white I totally understand what "Century of humiliation" really meant to the Chinese. I am sure 99.99% of the Chinese people are willing to pay the price for human equality and human dignity and a New Rules-Based International Order for all.
Tank you for video , science the brain is new 100 years . El Mundo tiene más de 8000 años y siguen descubriendo datoss. Military muchos son victimas y tienen hackeos . Un saludo desde Ferrolterra
Probably bit too paranoid about CHN's rise. All CHN needs is respect, TW is part of it, not being pushed around by US is also part of it. Although may seem "violent" from Anglo Saxon perspective for now, after those boxes ticked, a few nice words would be sufficient to keep distance between CHN and AUS. The Chinese value is essentially to elevate their social status through business and exams, - not through wars like in the European tradition, because the latter never had the state organized exam system. Besides, even after US retreats from Asia, AUS would still be affiliated with US within a US protection circle, due to culture and language. With good relationship with both CHN and US at that point, there will be little worry from conflicts with India or Indonesia, which will become reality in multipolarity. But, the idea of siding with US to take on CHN, over TW or SCS - that is simply suicide. Geographically and industrially CHN has all the advantage. And remember, that violates CHN's fundamental requirement for respect, especially after the century of humiliation. Professor White is definitely right about that being a bad option for AUS.
This hasn't aged well. 1) A pack of destroyers can block the majority of oil going through the Straits of Malacca, as long as they are outside of the Chinese substantial missile force. Seeing that China is reliant on imported oil for ~70% to ~80% of its needs and the vast majority of this oil comes through the Straits this is going to be problematic in the extreme for China. Then there's food, which China huge net importer also. The USA could position a quad of destroyers (just west of the Strait) with orders to interdict oil and food to China. Since they don't have a blue water navy China couldn't respond. This could be kept in place long as necessary 2) The Chinese demographic situation is that they are now #2 (behind India, which is #1) and have 1.3 billion people. And they are by some measures the fastest aging country in history of the world. In fact, the UN forecasts that by 2100 they will have about 850 million people. Some forecasters think this is optimistic, and that for the Chinese the worst case scenario is that China will have 700 million people. This puts them on the clock, among other problems. By comparison, the USA is projected for steady growth through the 2050s, which is astounding since by 2100 the populations of the USA and China may very well be comparable 3) The economic troubles in China are enormous: the semiconductor limitations orchestrated by the USA; the wildly over-built residential property sector; and the tumbling stock market, just to name a few. They certainly have not had the post-Covid bounce back, which was expected. These are all serious issues that won't be settled quickly, and its very distracting for the Chinese 4) The Chinese are trying mightily to avoid US sanctions due to the Russian invasion of Ukraine. This is one malady they've by and large dodged, much to Russia's dismay The bottom line is that President Xi will think twice before ordering an invasion
@tkk685 3 weeks ago A stark articulation of neocon thinking. Now we know who’s causing all the trouble in the region. 25 @jessejames7757 3 weeks ago This guy is part of the problem sad these old losers don't go away. @user-mx4uv2rc6v 5 months ago Professor M is a 1st class narcissist . . . [ Yes indeed, an old cantankerous narcissist & a war-mongering genocidal neocon. Mearsheimer will do anything to promote & keep alive his beloved (but out-dated, unrealistic) Offensive realism theory, even if it means perpetual wars, including nuclear wars ]. - Professor M is a 1st class narcissist . . . - And a blood-thirsty one too. @choisamwon2344 4 weeks ago I can understand why native Indians were all eliminated by the mind set of John and his ancestors in America. @fabio4465 4 days ago This old man is not in any condition to judge no one at all, he is completely insane. 6 Reply @marcosvidela7937 3 weeks ago I didn't know him as such a warmonger and US exceptionalist, disappointing @MRT-co1sd 3 weeks ago He’s a Neocon in a Realist skin @timneaves519 3 weeks ago Well said, I thought I must’ve misunderstood him because of his latest podcast and RU-vid appearances. Once a neocon always a neocon -Once a neocon always a neocon. @funtli 12 days ago The man is out of his mind @blackjackpinoko 3 weeks ago Self proclaimed realist is not a realist after all. @bobhan6395 4 weeks ago -John is too busy defending his contradicting positions, he is losing support for his academic theory. -It is sad to see brilliant mind like Mearsheimer diminishing his own achievements by contradicting his own logic. @metacomputist 1 month ago "contain", "contain", "contain", ..., "dominate", "dominate", "dominate", ... LOL ... He can't save himself from the imperialist's mindset @pengliu2087 1 month ago "US dominates the Western hemisphere, but I don't want China to dominate Asia the way we dominate west hemisphere"....hum fair enough I suppose? @aredtomato8957 1 month ago It's an obvious double standard by John. @bohanxu6125 1 month ago (edited) I can't believe the blatant tribalism coming from John Mearsheimer at 0:52. He is basically saying, "I want US to dominate not because US has a better system. I want US to dominate because I was born in US". Such thinking just feels so backward to me. @niarlatotepbasset 3 weeks ago He was always into U.S. global interests, only not in this crazy way that is leading to total collapse. @jane-ih4fo 5 months ago John is not just a fool, he is a liar. Other recent comments: -Prof. John Mearsheimer’s Offensive realism theory supports genocidal war in Gaza ( & elsewhere in the world) in order to uphold USA Hegemony & Primacy. -John Mearsheimer’s Offensive realism theory advocates USA Unipolar world domination & Supremacy. -Mearsheimer’s Offensive realism theory seeks to continue USA Hegemony in the world full of conflicts & wars ( including nuclear wars ). -Anyone who is curious about Mearsheimer should just google him and his stance on China. He's a Sinophobe. -John Mearsheimer is nothing but a unbridled gung-ho Warmonger, unabashed Exceptionist, genocidal Neocon. Totally unhinged. -This crazy psycho smiling and saying we are in the business of war and business is good tells you everything you need to know about him. -
WESTERN GOVERNMENT FUNDED PROPAGANDA & LIES.....TAIWAN - Where is America touting for let DEMOCRACY SPEAK NOW??? Less than 30% of people VOTED for independence for Taiwan!!! RESULTS-Notice the lack of FANFARE FROM BIDEN/AMERICA about the Taiwan election result? Fact: Less than 70% voter turn out. So the American stooge had a 39% vote of 70% of the people ====>> so less than 30% of people could be bothered to VOTE for independence for Taiwan!!! (...and we all KNOW HOW MUCH HOO HAA has been made demonising China and WARMONGERING and SCREAMING about DEMOCRACY and INDEPENDANCE by America leading up to the election!!)
@6:00 minutes mark he talks about home assignments. I got an email to download a pdf file and do the work but the thing is the job i applied for yesterday is no longer posted and the HR MGN (name is Einat) isn’t responsive. Why would you require a person to download a pcab pdf file I mean you can promote such test on your site or some other way. This downloading then do 3 assignments with a 5day limit sounds a little sketchy, along with job posting being deleted with the hr mgn not being responsive to any of my questions.
@davidrave563 @davidrave563 3 weeks ago When it comes to China he still has a colonial mindset. 46 Reply @waxeggoil3130 @waxeggoil3130 3 weeks ago I think the professor doesn't have a great understanding of China really. He bases his realism on Anglo European values of dominance and power. I think it has Always been his greatest shortcoming. Politicians in the USA tend to think this way too. They project their own colonialist mentality into the Chinese, project their own desire to solve every problem with violence and war. 30 Reply @remisofola5703 @remisofola5703 3 weeks ago It is sad to hear the professor say that the US should contain China over Taiwan, this is unrealistic but US has to play its hand given the fact that it is in decline and has been surpassed militarily in the area of Asia by China. 85 Reply @seer7327 @seer7327 3 weeks ago Containing China IS confronting China. His logic fails here. 80 Reply @robertyw2842 @robertyw2842 3 weeks ago Mearsheimer's ignorance on China's capability both militarily and economically is so bad that it's dangerous if China is indeed an enemy as he claimed! And his assessment of China's intention are nothing but projection; this dude is well well over rated.....! 32 Reply @CAlicocat711 @CAlicocat711 3 weeks ago Dear Prof. Mearsheimer, I'm in total agreement with you on everything else, but I clash violently with your take on China. Why, if we control the Western Hemisphere isn't that enough for our protection? China is not expanding except for a few atolls and inlets in their area. (We have the 800+ bases around the world.) And Taiwan belongs to them! 68 Reply 4 replies @jamaican_4_life95 @jamaican_4_life95 3 weeks ago I gotta say proffessor, I don't agree with your logic of seeing China as a threat to the US' interest. The more options smaller countries have to choose from, the better. The current mafia tactic that the world is subjected to isn't working. I can hear the American exceptionalism oozing out of this interview. The world has moved on and ot is in the interest of each government schoose whats better for their country rather tham following some unwritten order no 1 knows about that allows a few country to live above the many. Why is that? Kudos to Russia for following up on their red line. Sadly, others will follow. The world has to experience chaos in order to appreciate peace. 🙏 58 Reply 1 reply @tkk685 @tkk685 3 weeks ago A stark articulation of neocon thinking. Now we know who’s causing all the trouble in the region. 25 Reply 1 reply @ly1465 @ly1465 3 weeks ago As leveled headed as Mearsheimer is, he still got an egocentric POV where US must contain each & every emerging threats around the world in order to maintain its status quo. This is the thinking that got us all to where we are today and the very undoing of what it’s trying to maintain. 11 Reply @tiffanytran5712 @tiffanytran5712 3 weeks ago Disappointed in his assessment of China. Why does he think it’s ok to contain China while deductive reasoning would conclude that containment of any country by the US never ended up well. It’s pure US hegemony. Has China started any war in the last 40 years? Can we say the same for the US? 270 Reply 36 replies @jessejames7757 @jessejames7757 3 weeks ago This guy is part of the problem sad these old losers don't go away. 43 Reply @DailyBeatings @DailyBeatings 3 weeks ago Completely disagree with Mearsheimer about the containment theory. China for most of its existence was a regional power until western nations subjected them during the "Century of Humiliation". In their 5,000 year history China did not have any ambitions to project power beyond its sphere and to this day still view the west as "Barbarians", so why would they imitate what they despise? It makes absolutely no sense from a cultural, philosophical, and historical perspective. 129 Reply 29 replies @blackjackpinoko @blackjackpinoko 3 weeks ago Professor, you missed the fact that the US is trillions in debt. Still want to maintain as a world hegemony? 42 Reply 3 replies @blackjackpinoko @blackjackpinoko 3 weeks ago Self proclaimed realist is not a realist after all. 56 Reply @SimonMoniker @SimonMoniker 3 weeks ago Disappointing to learn that the professor thinks it's "realistic" to continue down this path of superfluous US militarism around the globe whilst saddled with trillions in debt, mounting troubles at home and a slew of embarrassing failures eg Afghanistan, Iraq and so on 30 Reply 4 replies @joechiara @joechiara 3 weeks ago I think Col Macgregor has a much better handle on the situation re China and China and Taiwan. I think the Professor is missing the mark on this one, but no one hits the mark all the time. 51 Reply 4 replies @js70371 @js70371 3 weeks ago American hubris and exceptionalism on full display here - not your best performance by far Professor Mearsheimer. 4/10 👎 56 Reply @jessejames7757 @jessejames7757 3 weeks ago This crazy psycho smiling and saying we are in the business of war and business is good tells you everything you need to know about him. 27 Reply 2 replies @mfromaustralia1 @mfromaustralia1 3 weeks ago Speaking from one of the poodle countries, i.e. Australia, I have to say Professor Mearsheimer has really got it wrong this time about Taiwan. Oh well, no-one can get it right all the time. Reply @user-vm5hr2ko7h @user-vm5hr2ko7h 2 weeks ago Please do not be conned by Prof. John Mearsheimer with his dodgy theory & feisty viewpoint. This theory has more holes than a Swiss Cheese. Ex- Australian PM Scott Morrison was one of the hot-headed, unwary, simple-minded politicians conned by John Mearsheimer’s Offensive realism theory. As a result of being conned by John Mearsheimer, Australia suffered several years of disastrous trade & diplomatic debacle with China. Thank God these mistakes have now been rectified by the current Australian PM Anthony Albanese. Warning to all politicians & citizens - please do not get conned again by John Mearsheimer & his dodgy Offensive realism theory. An unrealistic realism theory. How ironic. Prof. John Mearsheimer is well-known for his anti-Chinese racialism, anti-China phobia, war-mongering views toward China & despicable genocidal sentiment. Prof. Mearsheimer claims to have many friends in China ! How deluded and unrealistic is that. 1 other previous comment: @Time4Peace 7 months ago @esoterri8447 Agreed with your view. I have followed Mearsheimer for many years and watched his talks and debates in different countries. In Australia about 5 years ago, he was more to the point asking whether Australians are more comfortable with American or Chinese as a hegemon. He was debating with Hugh White associated with the anti-China ASPI, hardly an opponent in the debate! Australia had better relationship with China then. I feel Mearsheimer is not just an academic explaining his analysis but a passionate hawk on China out to persuade his audience that China must be contained even at the risk of a war. His argument that a multipolar world will diminish international world order is untenable. China is the one who wants to strengthen UN laws and order, applying fairly to all nations. US, on the other hand, unilaterally picks and chooses when and what laws to observe. It does not subscribe to the laws of the seas nor international tribunal but will use them as tools against countries when needed. For example, many sanctions and invasions are illegitimate based on UN laws. It (with Europe) controls IMF and the World Bank in loans handed out and their conditions It's unfortunate (and dangerously so) that it is using Taiwan (and it seems also Philippines) to trigger situations for a cold and even hot war with China. Show less 27 @Time4Peace 7 months ago @esoterri8447 Hugh was the inaugural Director of ASPI (which was partly funded by the US weapons corporations). He has continued to write for ASPI. He has been criticised by colleagues to have been bellicose on China and exaggerates its threat, and to recommend costly weaponry for defense (war). In the debate between Mearsheimer vs Hugh White, Mearsheimer argued asked whether Australians are more comfortable under US or China as the hegemon. Hugh gave such weak arguments against Mearsheimer (and even agreeing with him at some points) that the debate was clearly a farce, a ploy to swing Australian elites against China. At that time, Australia-China relationship was still positive Show less 2 Reply @mikejones3810 @mikejones3810 10 days ago As a citizen of the United States, I have never heard a compelling argument about Ukraine, a country bordering Russia being a strategic security risk for our nation. 135 Reply 14 replies @perceivedreality7933 @perceivedreality7933 11 days ago The globalists wanted to make a fool out of Russia. But instead, the globalists ended up making fools of themselves. Let that be a lesson. 136 Reply 5 replies @hectorshouse7348 @hectorshouse7348 11 days ago Anyone else fed up with the USA and U.K. causing trouble all over the world? Reply 1
@davidrave563 @davidrave563 3 weeks ago When it comes to China he still has a colonial mindset. 46 Reply @waxeggoil3130 @waxeggoil3130 3 weeks ago I think the professor doesn't have a great understanding of China really. He bases his realism on Anglo European values of dominance and power. I think it has Always been his greatest shortcoming. Politicians in the USA tend to think this way too. They project their own colonialist mentality into the Chinese, project their own desire to solve every problem with violence and war. 30 Reply @remisofola5703 @remisofola5703 3 weeks ago It is sad to hear the professor say that the US should contain China over Taiwan, this is unrealistic but US has to play its hand given the fact that it is in decline and has been surpassed militarily in the area of Asia by China. 85 Reply @seer7327 @seer7327 3 weeks ago Containing China IS confronting China. His logic fails here. 80 Reply @robertyw2842 @robertyw2842 3 weeks ago Mearsheimer's ignorance on China's capability both militarily and economically is so bad that it's dangerous if China is indeed an enemy as he claimed! And his assessment of China's intention are nothing but projection; this dude is well well over rated.....! 32 Reply @CAlicocat711 @CAlicocat711 3 weeks ago Dear Prof. Mearsheimer, I'm in total agreement with you on everything else, but I clash violently with your take on China. Why, if we control the Western Hemisphere isn't that enough for our protection? China is not expanding except for a few atolls and inlets in their area. (We have the 800+ bases around the world.) And Taiwan belongs to them! 68 Reply 4 replies @jamaican_4_life95 @jamaican_4_life95 3 weeks ago I gotta say proffessor, I don't agree with your logic of seeing China as a threat to the US' interest. The more options smaller countries have to choose from, the better. The current mafia tactic that the world is subjected to isn't working. I can hear the American exceptionalism oozing out of this interview. The world has moved on and ot is in the interest of each government schoose whats better for their country rather tham following some unwritten order no 1 knows about that allows a few country to live above the many. Why is that? Kudos to Russia for following up on their red line. Sadly, others will follow. The world has to experience chaos in order to appreciate peace. 🙏 58 Reply 1 reply @tkk685 @tkk685 3 weeks ago A stark articulation of neocon thinking. Now we know who’s causing all the trouble in the region. 25 Reply 1 reply @ly1465 @ly1465 3 weeks ago As leveled headed as Mearsheimer is, he still got an egocentric POV where US must contain each & every emerging threats around the world in order to maintain its status quo. This is the thinking that got us all to where we are today and the very undoing of what it’s trying to maintain. 11 Reply @tiffanytran5712 @tiffanytran5712 3 weeks ago Disappointed in his assessment of China. Why does he think it’s ok to contain China while deductive reasoning would conclude that containment of any country by the US never ended up well. It’s pure US hegemony. Has China started any war in the last 40 years? Can we say the same for the US? 270 Reply 36 replies @jessejames7757 @jessejames7757 3 weeks ago This guy is part of the problem sad these old losers don't go away. 43 Reply @DailyBeatings @DailyBeatings 3 weeks ago Completely disagree with Mearsheimer about the containment theory. China for most of its existence was a regional power until western nations subjected them during the "Century of Humiliation". In their 5,000 year history China did not have any ambitions to project power beyond its sphere and to this day still view the west as "Barbarians", so why would they imitate what they despise? It makes absolutely no sense from a cultural, philosophical, and historical perspective. 129 Reply 29 replies @blackjackpinoko @blackjackpinoko 3 weeks ago Professor, you missed the fact that the US is trillions in debt. Still want to maintain as a world hegemony? 42 Reply 3 replies @blackjackpinoko @blackjackpinoko 3 weeks ago Self proclaimed realist is not a realist after all. 56 Reply @SimonMoniker @SimonMoniker 3 weeks ago Disappointing to learn that the professor thinks it's "realistic" to continue down this path of superfluous US militarism around the globe whilst saddled with trillions in debt, mounting troubles at home and a slew of embarrassing failures eg Afghanistan, Iraq and so on 30 Reply 4 replies @joechiara @joechiara 3 weeks ago I think Col Macgregor has a much better handle on the situation re China and China and Taiwan. I think the Professor is missing the mark on this one, but no one hits the mark all the time. 51 Reply 4 replies @js70371 @js70371 3 weeks ago American hubris and exceptionalism on full display here - not your best performance by far Professor Mearsheimer. 4/10 👎 56 Reply @jessejames7757 @jessejames7757 3 weeks ago This crazy psycho smiling and saying we are in the business of war and business is good tells you everything you need to know about him. 27 Reply 2 replies @mfromaustralia1 @mfromaustralia1 3 weeks ago Speaking from one of the poodle countries, i.e. Australia, I have to say Professor Mearsheimer has really got it wrong this time about Taiwan. Oh well, no-one can get it right all the time. Reply @user-vm5hr2ko7h @user-vm5hr2ko7h 2 weeks ago Please do not be conned by Prof. John Mearsheimer with his dodgy theory & feisty viewpoint. This theory has more holes than a Swiss Cheese. Ex- Australian PM Scott Morrison was one of the hot-headed, unwary, simple-minded politicians conned by John Mearsheimer’s Offensive realism theory. As a result of being conned by John Mearsheimer, Australia suffered several years of disastrous trade & diplomatic debacle with China. Thank God these mistakes have now been rectified by the current Australian PM Anthony Albanese. Warning to all politicians & citizens - please do not get conned again by John Mearsheimer & his dodgy Offensive realism theory. An unrealistic realism theory. How ironic. Prof. John Mearsheimer is well-known for his anti-Chinese racialism, anti-China phobia, war-mongering views toward China & despicable genocidal sentiment. Prof. Mearsheimer claims to have many friends in China ! How deluded and unrealistic is that. 1 other previous comment: @Time4Peace 7 months ago @esoterri8447 Agreed with your view. I have followed Mearsheimer for many years and watched his talks and debates in different countries. In Australia about 5 years ago, he was more to the point asking whether Australians are more comfortable with American or Chinese as a hegemon. He was debating with Hugh White associated with the anti-China ASPI, hardly an opponent in the debate! Australia had better relationship with China then. I feel Mearsheimer is not just an academic explaining his analysis but a passionate hawk on China out to persuade his audience that China must be contained even at the risk of a war. His argument that a multipolar world will diminish international world order is untenable. China is the one who wants to strengthen UN laws and order, applying fairly to all nations. US, on the other hand, unilaterally picks and chooses when and what laws to observe. It does not subscribe to the laws of the seas nor international tribunal but will use them as tools against countries when needed. For example, many sanctions and invasions are illegitimate based on UN laws. It (with Europe) controls IMF and the World Bank in loans handed out and their conditions It's unfortunate (and dangerously so) that it is using Taiwan (and it seems also Philippines) to trigger situations for a cold and even hot war with China. Show less 27 @Time4Peace 7 months ago @esoterri8447 Hugh was the inaugural Director of ASPI (which was partly funded by the US weapons corporations). He has continued to write for ASPI. He has been criticised by colleagues to have been bellicose on China and exaggerates its threat, and to recommend costly weaponry for defense (war). In the debate between Mearsheimer vs Hugh White, Mearsheimer argued asked whether Australians are more comfortable under US or China as the hegemon. Hugh gave such weak arguments against Mearsheimer (and even agreeing with him at some points) that the debate was clearly a farce, a ploy to swing Australian elites against China. At that time, Australia-China relationship was still positive Show less 2 Reply @robertyw2842 @robertyw2842 3 weeks ago Mearsheimer's ignorance on China's capability both militarily and economically is so bad that it's dangerous if China is indeed an enemy as he claimed! And his assessment of China's intention are nothing but projection; this dude is well well over rated.....! 32 Reply @mikejones3810 @mikejones3810 10 days ago As a citizen of the United States, I have never heard a compelling argument about Ukraine, a country bordering Russia being a strategic security risk for our nation. 135 Reply 14 replies @perceivedreality7933 @perceivedreality7933 11 days ago The globalists wanted to make a fool out of Russia. But instead, the globalists ended up making fools of themselves. Let that be a lesson. 136 Reply 5 replies @hectorshouse7348 @hectorshouse7348 11 days ago Anyone else fed up with the USA and U.K. causing trouble all over the world? Reply 1
An awful lot of people in Taiwan have ancestral roots on the mainland. If there is a lot of identifiable resistance after reunification, troublemakers could be sent back to their ancestral villages. I don't think it would take too long to integrate Taiwan back into the rest of China. At one point people in Taiwan could look at the mainlanders as backwards, but I don't think that's the case anymore.
The US has fought many wars after the WW2, but never fought a strong and nuclear armed country. Always fought weak countries, most of them developing countries.
I'm worried the funding will be mismanaged and wasted, unless we teach SME businesses how to assess and address business risk and information privacy. Service providers have a significant role to play.
🎯 Key Takeaways for quick navigation: 00:00 🎙️ *Introduction to Singapore Academy of Law* - Overview of the Singapore Academy of Law and its role in the legal landscape in Singapore. - Membership composition and diversity. - Key functions, including professional development and creation of legal knowledge. 03:25 🌐 *Regulatory and Legal Developments in AI* - Discussion on the evolving themes in AI, such as misinformation, protection, and biases. - Zee Kin's experience in AI and various roles in technology and law. - The enduring legal concerns in technology and AI, including content, personal data, and cybersecurity. 07:20 🖼️ *Copyright and AI: The Stability AI Case* - Exploration of the JTI vs. Stability AI case, involving allegations of copyright infringement. - The complexities of proving copyright violations in AI. - The importance of data lineage and legal basis for using data in AI models. 10:32 🌍 *International Regulatory Responses to AI* - Comparison of different countries' responses to AI, including bans on GPT-3. - The evolution of global attitudes toward AI regulation. - The need for nuanced and context-specific regulations for AI technologies. 14:00 📜 *EU AI Act and Refining AI Principles* - Discussion of the EU AI Act and its focus on transparency and explainability in AI. - Adapting AI principles for different contexts and technologies. - The challenges of ensuring repeatability and reproducibility in generative AI. 16:31 👩⚖️ *Impact of AI on Job Security in the Legal Profession* - Consideration of job security in the legal profession due to AI. - Emphasis on the historical perspective of job transitions in response to technological advancements. - Opportunities for lawyers in AI-related roles, such as data pre-processing and legal domain expertise. Made with HARPA AI
