Тёмный
Demonin
Demonin
Demonin
Подписаться
The 21,790-step Turmite
11:18
Год назад
A Shroomy Situation in Minecraft
4:26
2 года назад
Minecraft Block Price Comparison
2:04
2 года назад
Minecraft, but with More Hearts
3:55
2 года назад
Number Names 0 to 10^3,000,000,003
12:36
2 года назад
I've got to
5:11
4 года назад
Demonin - Oblivious (Full Album)
36:11
5 лет назад
Demonin - Video Runes (Full Album)
35:42
5 лет назад
Demonin - RAN_WAVE1 (Full Album)
20:18
5 лет назад
Комментарии
@asamuel3577
@asamuel3577 3 дня назад
1 billion not here 😢😢😢
@Dgfy3.
@Dgfy3. 5 дней назад
Caloxi Buroxi Shunoxi Dharoxi Lunoxi
@carriekaus6900
@carriekaus6900 9 дней назад
Where is part four
@miakolt
@miakolt 18 дней назад
what about: 1048 1725 2004 6729 19752 84752 131072 487490432 69696969696969692 and more...
@not_porter
@not_porter 19 дней назад
SOOOOOOOOOO underrated wtf
@xGameBoyy
@xGameBoyy 26 дней назад
man if you reupload this video again it may get luckier with the algorithm and get millions of views, wich it deserves
@xGameBoyy
@xGameBoyy 26 дней назад
really enjoyed the whole thing
@LC19.
@LC19. Месяц назад
This is such an impressive Video. As if this only has less than 4000 views.
@julesharris6383
@julesharris6383 Месяц назад
VS applied to x is Triangle(x)
@1234thecreator
@1234thecreator Месяц назад
1:25:22 the best part of the video
@BichNgoc-qm7mi
@BichNgoc-qm7mi Месяц назад
Pls part 4
@crannmarbh8559
@crannmarbh8559 Месяц назад
genuinely incredible video. introduced me to an entirely unfamiliar field of study that, while i don’t comprehend most of it, is nonetheless utterly fascinating to me. i definitely see the solar sands influence, and i would say this holds up to the quality of monumentality.
@aramisreyes1657
@aramisreyes1657 Месяц назад
part 4 when?
@johnjairocastrillon4563
@johnjairocastrillon4563 Месяц назад
Great video man
@BusybeaverG64
@BusybeaverG64 Месяц назад
Muy infravalorado
@LuisaBedoyamartinez
@LuisaBedoyamartinez Месяц назад
Muy buen video, voy a comentar para que le llegue a mas personas
@LuisaBedoyamartinez
@LuisaBedoyamartinez Месяц назад
Great video
@BusybeaverG64
@BusybeaverG64 Месяц назад
This video is a gem, it deserves much more support
@BusybeaverG64
@BusybeaverG64 Месяц назад
Esto necesita mas visitas, esta es una joya, muy completo video y calidad en cada instante
@justagoosethatsall
@justagoosethatsall Месяц назад
this video is so 💀💣❗🎺ing amazing you dont even know this needs more views, you need more subs, please keep doing awesome videos like this. you have earned my subscription.
@InfinityITX
@InfinityITX Месяц назад
0:38 overcharging point
@DameVonBonDaisy
@DameVonBonDaisy 2 месяца назад
Minecraft: ORE WONDERS
@shushi-chan
@shushi-chan 2 месяца назад
0:31
@user-tk6or6lq4h
@user-tk6or6lq4h 2 месяца назад
YEEEEE THE BATTERY DIDN'T DIE
@user-tk6or6lq4h
@user-tk6or6lq4h 2 месяца назад
I hope the battery won't die acctually
@CarterKing-wc6ty
@CarterKing-wc6ty 2 месяца назад
I never watched this in years
@asheep7797
@asheep7797 2 месяца назад
Ok, but what about 41?
@LiMetzo
@LiMetzo 2 месяца назад
Greatest video about Large Numbers, G.O.A.T. video
@AnaMunoz-el5ch
@AnaMunoz-el5ch 2 месяца назад
23:04
@thanhtamnguyenthi7073
@thanhtamnguyenthi7073 2 месяца назад
So this is why you aren't making new games/updating them.
@idonothavealife
@idonothavealife 2 месяца назад
This feels like an upload from a 1M sub channel, not 1.5K.
@hiranpeiris877
@hiranpeiris877 11 дней назад
true
@Wendroners
@Wendroners 2 месяца назад
Has to be the highest quality large number related video I've seen on this site, enjoyed the thorough research+trivia and it came as a surprise that you were the one who wrote the JPA article lol Although here's a thing I noted: You've noted in the video that deep-end of the ordinals were a bit out of scope knowledge-wise and I'd say the wiki user Hyp cos' "comparison to ordinal collapsing function" blog post series gives enough grasp to explain (understand at the very least maybe?) how the ordinals collapse imo - a tiny introduction to ordinals in googological context would have been nice, when I delved my feet into this whole jazz, Vsauce vid was of no help. Great presentation nonetheless 🍻
@zander513
@zander513 2 месяца назад
Terminus Epsilion Ron Mario Inaccesible Nandless Ultimate Symbol)
@asheep7797
@asheep7797 2 месяца назад
Gnu's Not Unix!
@namanagarwal6989
@namanagarwal6989 2 месяца назад
Really appreciate the video an you work. Makings number this intresting is a omega feat. Wish to learn practical use of large numbers in future.
@casualbeluga2724
@casualbeluga2724 2 месяца назад
very underrated
@Khanmd-zi6vg
@Khanmd-zi6vg 2 месяца назад
I just play games, do googology, play games, etc.
@sebastianszymysl2689
@sebastianszymysl2689 2 месяца назад
2:43 first diamond
@sebastianszymysl2689
@sebastianszymysl2689 3 месяца назад
battery shield infinity omg❤
@florenciagiselle3202
@florenciagiselle3202 3 месяца назад
'_'(^_^)
@user-tk6or6lq4h
@user-tk6or6lq4h 3 месяца назад
Tycer Luna friend and Me: why it is 1e10 hp?
@MrMrPurple
@MrMrPurple 3 месяца назад
The views on this video should be a large number
@asheep7797
@asheep7797 2 месяца назад
The first large number was 2. So yeah, I'd say 2,701 is large.
@godofnumbersakausername5226
@godofnumbersakausername5226 Месяц назад
​@@asheep7797 Well that's what Sbiss Saibian calls "Large" but the meaning of a "Large Number" is arbitrary as it depends on what you are measuring. If it is the amount of money you make per second, 0.1 would be super large. But if you are measuring the volume of different planets with cubic planck lengths, then something like a decillion would be a tiny number. However, in the context of being the views of a RU-vid video, a large number would probably be a number = or > than 1M.
@MrMrPurple
@MrMrPurple Месяц назад
@@asheep7797fair enough
@Muqtadiraillance
@Muqtadiraillance 3 месяца назад
0:19 *G O O G O L*
@aaronsoto6531
@aaronsoto6531 4 месяца назад
Same thing 😏
@user-ig7xe3bf3e
@user-ig7xe3bf3e 4 месяца назад
00:3 00:2 00:1 00.0
@user-ig7xe3bf3e
@user-ig7xe3bf3e 4 месяца назад
500{5у}10^^^10^^^10^^^10^^^{5}
@user-ig7xe3bf3e
@user-ig7xe3bf3e 4 месяца назад
10^10^10^10^2391
@user-ig7xe3bf3e
@user-ig7xe3bf3e 4 месяца назад
100: вересня 1
@user-ig7xe3bf3e
@user-ig7xe3bf3e 4 месяца назад
\1000вдву/42:29
@tylerlarsen1842
@tylerlarsen1842 4 месяца назад
A few years ago, I engaged in a comment thread with the creator of the LNGN to try and gain even the smallest understanding of what the hell it was even trying to do. As stated in the video, Rayo's number diagonalizes over the first-order logical deductions of set theory. Even when limiting ourselves to ten thousand first-order characters, the numbers that can be defined GREATLY surpass the maximum shifts function, and Rayo's number calls for a googol characters. Now, it is stated in the video that this could also be defined for second-order logic, third-order logic, and so on and so forth. What the LNGN does is group all of those nth-order theories into a "universe", and then uses that as the base for another hierarchy of set theory logic to be grouped into another universe, rinse and repeat. The creator calls this "First-Order Theory Beyond Higher-Order Set Theory", as in, it completely TRANSCENDS traditional set theory. He literally created the set theory multiverse just to define this one unfathomable number. The scale of this number is so far beyond even Rayo's number that whichever set theory you decide to use as the base for the LNGN calculations literally doesn't even matter, as opposed to Rayo's number where it does have a significant impact. And I can confirm that the creator is VERY picky about formal definitions.