In the 1995 Anand vs Kasparov world championship, Anand took the lead in game 9. In game 10, every time Kasparov made a move, he got up and slammed the door so hard the room shook. The young and mild mannered Anand did not complain to the arbiter, who also did not act. Bullying destroys lives, and bullied children suffer lifelong low self esteem. Kasparov should not get a free pass for his actions. Chess is only a game, so why did he need to behave that way?
Re Kasparov's actions on and off the board, it is a salient part of his bio to note what happened in the 1995 world championship. Anand took the lead in game 9. In game 10, every time Kasparov made a move, he got up and slammed the door so hard the room shook. The young and mild mannered Anand did not complain to the arbiter, who also did not act. Bullying destroys lives, and bullied children suffer lifelong low self esteem. Kasparov needs to be made to confront his behavior and answer for it. It cannot be allowed to slide.
With regard to Kasparov, an essential part of his bio needs to be widely known. In the 1995 world championship, Anand took the lead in game 9. In game 10, every time Kasparov made a move, he got up and slammed the door so hard the room shook. The young and mild mannered Anand did not complain to the arbiter, who also did not act. Bullying destroys lives, and bullied children suffer lifelong low self esteem. Kasparov needs to be confronted with his behavior and asked to answer for it.
Kasparov would have won this game if he had employed the same door slam attack which he first unleashed against Vishy Anand in the 1995 World Championship. Anand won game 9 to take the lead. In game 10, Kasparov came up with his novel idea. After every move, he would get up to go to the bathroom and slam the door behind him so hard the room shook. Anand was so stunned by this maneuver he did not say anything to the arbiter, and the arbiter did nothing either. No other player has managed to employ this attack as far as I know. This is unique among all the attacks known in chess -- the Richter-Rauzer attack, the Max Lange attack, the King's Indian attack -- this one is totally different.
Schwarz spielt hier "Fehler" über "Fehler". Mit Springer B2 F4 aufzugeben, der Kardinalfehler ohne Not. Aber, das kann man auch vollkommen anders sehen ...
What a display of (locked) pawn structure battle! Also two unusually huge plots of territory, one for each side! English vs Dutch opening - a unique game. Thank you👍
As the opening prepares to metamorphose into the middlegame, we find White castled queenside on the queenside, and Black castled queenside on the kingside.
