Is there something wrong in the recording, because in the other comparison videos, the Fostex is far ahead of its rivals, yet here, they sound empty, hollow and lacking in bass, which I know they're not?
Cost-effectiveness and specs make GHX have considerable expectations... but the vocal transparency is better in Postex... GHX has a slight clumping feel to it... Overall, I didn't know that full-range units would be this good.
First, Fostexes were not matched. Not a precise manufacturing process. Second, they have terrible bumps and deeps. The only Fostex I like is old 1206ne if I’m not mistaken
Don’t you realize that Qts 0.7 goes to an open baffle, 0.3-0.5 to vented box, and 1.4 to an infinite baffle? When you mess up everything in a standard vented box, you get an ugly bass for 0.7 and a terrible one for 1.4. Nothing useful then
It has more bass weight than the Fostex, but that's not to say that I don't like the Fostex here, because I do. If I bought the Foistex, I would miss the Z-Modena's bass. If I bought the Z's, I'd miss the Fostex more open sound