(1) To believe in JESUS: Means you believe in the Holy Bible, & do what JESUS: says, you become & are A DOER OF THE WORD OF GOD (JESUS) {{be strong brothers & sisters & Repent from sin }🔥(Matthew,4:17) “From that time Jesus began to preach, and to say, Repent: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.” KJV • also read this Verse about what JESUS, says to those you believed in Him & used His Name to cast out devils 🔥(Matthew,7:22-23) “Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.” KJV • JESUS; said believe in Me and Live Forever • that means Him & His Word; the HOLY BIBLE, His gospel • JESUS: is the Word of GOD: read🔥(Revelation,19:13) the Word of GOD (John,1:1) in the beginning was the Word • JESUS: is the Word of GOD: Made Flesh, read🔥(John,1:14) the Word made flesh • GOD: in the Flesh, read🔥(1Timothy,3:16) GOD manifest flesh • JESUS: is the Tree of Life, GOD, said eat from it & Live forever, read🔥(Genesis,2:9) in the midst the garden the Tree of Life •(2) 🔥(Genesis,3:22) eat and Live forever 🔥(John,6:47-58) “Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me hath everlasting life. I am that bread of life. Your fathers did eat manna in the wilderness, and are dead. This is the bread which cometh down from heaven, that a man may eat thereof, and not die. I am the living bread which came down from heaven: if any man eat of this bread, he shall live for ever: and the bread that I will give is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world. The Jews therefore strove among themselves, saying, How can this man give us his flesh to eat? Then Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Except ye eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, ye have no life in you. Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day. For my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed. He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I in him. As the living Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father: so he that eateth me, even he shall live by me. This is that bread which came down from heaven: not as your fathers did eat manna, and are dead: he that eateth of this bread shall live for ever.”🔥(Joshua,1:8)meditate day & night, do according to what is Written be prosperous 🔥(John,8:30-32) “As he spake these words, many believed on him. Then said Jesus to those Jews which believed on him, If ye continue in my word, then are ye my disciples indeed; and ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”KJV • we become one in CHRIST JESUS; we are A new Creature, Born again & YES, Very Much "BELIEVERS" 🔥(Romans,6:5-6) “For if we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection: knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin.” KJV • in the Mighty Name, JESUS: of Nazareth • Amen
The pelican feeding its young by its own blood is a Rose Cross Order icon. It is Gnosticism. Martin Luther signed letters with a Rose Croix wax stamp ring.
I first saw the gardens on an undergraduate open day and I remember being struck by their tranquillity - how could this beautiful and peaceful garden be right in the centre of the city? I was amazed! Thankfully, I would return many times from 2010-2014 and got to see them change through the seasons. Even just popping in for a few minutes was a mood-booster, but in particular for me, the gardens were a place to spend time with friends, a place for summer tutorials, or a much-needed escape from the anguish of finals preparation. Thank you and well done Andrew. Wishing David well as he takes over.
And now, over 2 hours later after I had written that and then fallen down an Emma Smith rabbit hole of her RU-vid links and a lil This Is Shakespeare book buying binge… I must go to bed…. but i also now know what I’m doing this weekend 😂😂😂
An excellent watch for prospective state school children, you are creating and delivering achievable aspirations for future generations Well done Wadham !! PS This video needs to be more accessible and easily found by prospective students when searching the internet
Heminges and Condel were given only 1 pound 40p each. How did they finance a book printing that cost >1,000 pounds? A copy of the First Folio sold for 24 pounds in 1664 so the total run of 750 copies would, at that rate, have sold for ~18,000 pounds. Cost of production was significantly less than that but certainly well above the 2 pounds 80p that Heminges and Condel had.
I am going to Oxford international I am not a boy my picture is showing of my dad I am really a girl I go to Oxford international college and study there I love the teacher most is Kumari teacher I love so much that I can't stop❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ I want to go to Oxford international college iodine and you have to pay 7000 it's very expensive sometimes they will ask you 10. 000 they will only ask money 💰 but they won't let you to talk with anyone you when it exam you have to parts you have to come if you don't come you are not coming in the school that happened to me I got all of them A and my Sinhala E
You cannot create a system using language that explains the entire system using that same language. For example, you can produce a mathematical proof that is demonstrably true, but that your proof cannot solve with out stepping out side of your language system. This turns out to be true for every form of expression. The consequence of this is that truth becomes very hard to find, and rather ironically means that every belief system ultimately becomes an act of faith.
@@khimaros If I remember correctly the only thing that Gödel showed is that there are very specific self referential true statements which cannot be proven within any logical system sufficiently complex to perform simple arithmetic. Why would that impact the truth of everything else within that system?
@@pianoraves it doesn’t impact the things you’ve proved, it just shows there are limits to these mathematical systems and they cannot fully describe reality. We’ll never have a theory of everything, and Penrose sees it as proof that consciousness cannot be a computation.
The problem with this argument is that it ignores heuristics: pragmatic and informal shortcut approaches to "understanding" or knowing things, that either cannot be formally proven, or else would be prohibitively challenging to do so. Computers can be (and have been) programmed to identify things through heuristics.
One of the wisest men on the planet. There aren’t very many of them .. people who can think outside the box . You know .. real scientists who don’t accept the dogma they were trained to believe about the nature of reality. See his theories on a cyclic model of the Universe and how consciousness may be mediated in the brain/body via quantum processes. But note .. not manufactured by the brain. There is no evidence that the brain secretes or manufactures consciousness. Only people who haven’t looked at the evidence propose that and … no one knows how to “make” consciousness from LEGO like “dead” atoms. How do you make awareness from Lego ?
Hi I have a bible like that the binding is not very good if you could get back to me I could send pics as I would love to find out more about it thanks
Thank you so much for your clear and interesting video. I have been a friend 😁of the I Ching from an age of 17 years. Back then I didnt understand it, but always had and have a huge respect as if the book was alive. Now I,m 54 and when I ask my good old wise friend I Ching a question I can feel its loyal and unconditional energy for guiding me to the best posible choice. Its so profound and mysterious. I am trully greatful to have this friend lying on my bookshelf. Thank you again for your expalnation and bring it to the west of this Earth we live upon.
He is strongly moving towards a mythologization of philosophy and science. We do Not Even know what it really is and he is excluding it by mere feelings.
What a joy to come across this here, five years later! I grew up as a Presbyterian here in Texas with the Authorized Version alternating with the Revised Standard and my father loved the Knox. Great presentation!
And hopeless at just sticking to Atiyah’s names: What the fuck is a ‘twistor’. Spinor itself had the entire theory of Galois field extensions stuck between the ill definedness of algebra and geometry. Spinor is a concept of ill conceivable majesty; you should just call whatever the manifold is a spinor if it’s meant to be a model for this algebro-geometrically ill defined construction that isn’t of a constructive nature. It’s meant to be well-defined. Check the projective geometry notes: Is a projective plane (in the pure sense of concept) meant to orientable or unorientable? If it’s the same thing as in GoS then it’s not going to become a fucking sphere is it!
If you’re so clever how about trying to solve the mystery of consciousness and the origin of the universe /poss’ cyclic universe . He has theories which aren’t pie in the sky for both.
Is that the nature of consciousness? The peak of human consciousness: of cumming inside my girl…..? Why would I be referring to any result due to Penrose?
@@Sam-ri3hr oh, thank you! Obviosuly, Twistor has a meaning…. I’m commenting on a fine analytical tick I have with its use at all: given the use of spinnors that model quantum mechanical spin: What is spin? Not a rotation…. It’s meant to be an intrinsic measure: your headache is a quantum mechanical event , in the sense of having been accelerated by the canonical particles….. Nigel Hitchin’s recent paper on the spinnor-valued Higgs field is a good example of my attitude. He uses deep topology in a way that reflects my attitudes.
I think it is naive of Penrose to think that the theoretical impossibility of machines to prove theorems implies that humans are not machines. Humans will never be able to prove all theorems either, simply because some of them take 10^300 symbols to even formulate, let alone prove.
The time limit in chess is often considered absurd. When you introduce a clock to chess, you're no longer measuring the skill of a player but rather their speed. It's akin to the pressure of timed exams, where many students who might have excelled under different conditions fail not because of their abilities but because they run out of time. It's a scenario where the absence of a time constraint could have led to success. So I get you Penrose, i don't like timed chess myself, it puts me in a box😂😂
@@Henry_Wilder simply Google how many possible chess moves there are. It's more than the number of atoms in the universe. Ruling out illegal moves, it's something like 10^40 possible moves.
@@rahulramkissoon Alright, let's say the validity of your statement about the vast number of possible moves in chess is true. I think you're missing the point. I'm talking about the dynamics of a timed versus untimed match. In a timed setting, the pressure to decide on the optimal move within a constrained timeframe intensifies. This doesn't necessarily imply inferiority; rather, it highlights the challenge of making critical decisions under time constraints. My point is that in a timed game, where seconds count, the margin for deep analysis of each move is significantly reduced compared to its untimed counterpart. This reduction in available time can increase the risk of suboptimal choices, not due to a lack of skill, but simply because there isn't enough time to thoroughly evaluate all potential moves. Do you get?
@@Henry_Wilder So if we played a game without a timer. At what point do you think would be too long for a person to play a move? 1 hour? 24 hours? 1 year? You could analyze a position for months. I agree that time constraints aren't for everyone. But we have to atleast agree on the time limit per move, else you could be waiting years
We're all glad you signed, Michael! Today is your birthday where I live, so happy birthday, sir! As a literature and professional writing student, you're one of my greatest inspirations. Much love from Australia! 💝
I was at Wadham 92-95 so this was incredibly nostalgic for me. Hapoy days! A very accurate picture of life at Wadham, although I don't remember us speaking as posh as this lot! Maybe I just didn't notice.
Thank you! Someone finally says it. There is no intelligence behind AI. It's not even artifical stupidity. All AI is a more powerful form of computation.
A blast from the past! Would you consider putting the whole video up? I’d love to see it and today’s students could learn about the prehistoric times when we left notes on each other’s doors as no one had mobile phones…
I'm so glad. My long-awaited expectation, finally, this wonderful scientist paid attention to this question. Since the distant 1997, I have been very interested in this question. but there was no opportunity to do science. I wish you great luck. I advise you to conduct experiments with acetabulary, acting on it, and finding mechanisms that disrupt the work on the formation of the cytoskeleton. It will be necessary to analyze and then try to change the cytoskeleton in a targeted way. And then it will be possible to get close to the technology of genetic programming of the cytoskeleton.
Is anyone else getting no audio from the video? I'm getting subtitles which means it must have had audio at the upload stage? Fascinating video, either way. Thanks
@Lewdog audio is working on our end. The audio does seem to have been mixed to pan more to one side than the other so if you're using mono sound settings or you only have 1 working headphone side, there could be problems there.