It's the same as any subjective opinion. For me Kobe is the best, Roger the best, RONALDINHO the BEST, for example. Stats do not back this up. The eye test is more important. Djoker was way more durable than Federer. Just as Lebron more than Kobe, Messi/Ronaldo over Dinho etc.. I'm tired of people arguing the same subjective shit. The more you argue the dumber you look because it's all opinion anyway. There is no "i'm the greatest award or titles". THE GREATEST IS JUST OPINION. Djoker is definitely the most winningest tennis player. Certainly the most accomplished and wouldn't be an oversight saying he is the best.
Port supporter here 1. No 2. No 3. Yes but its all banter 4. Replace Cornes and Koch with Dixon and Boak 5. Yes i like rum and cokes but i dont swear at the general public 6. Yes but replace knee with foot
Novak is the opposite of Kyrgios. Nothing flashy, just pure focus and professionalism. Kyrgios has something of a rebellious teenager or a toddler. I can imagine he was a nightmare in the school, bullying everybody, specially teachers. He has some talent, I got this, but this is nothing without respecting other players, public and empires. He is too much in love with his image as a cool guy, gangster like, but we (adults) know that this is just ridiculous. There is nothing cool in showing everyone that you don’t care training and just win because the talent. He got what he is as a tennis player because other people were teaching him how to play.
