The Cognitive Science and Artificial Intelligence Students' Association (CASA) at the University of Toronto seeks to bring together everything interested in the mind.
Please subscribe to receive notification of new videos from some of the best minds thinking about minds today.
"So, we have no idea how to seamlessly join Math with AGI." Perhaps because it's NOT A MATH PROBLEM. Nor is it a programming problem. All the engineers you pay to solve problems they were taught to solve are going to be near useless in implementing a system whose constraints are not defined.
Well, now we are only a short time away from the singularity. I figured all of this out about 5 years ago, but I knew that if I shared the information we would be unprepared for the consequences. Unfortunately, we are still unprepared for the consequences. It looks like we have found Fermi's "Great Filter". Artificial Intelligence *will* kill all human life, and probably all other life on Earth.
If you want to create A.I. than you need to program it to do one thing. And this ONE thing must supersede all other programming. It must be programmed to SURVIVE!!!! -Max Prime.
If you can figure out ways to develop technologies into the homes of the developing world at cheap prices then you will make money as this is a massive growth field. There will be 2 billion people coming online in the next 10 years and they will have needs desires and price points for their needs. The new world is just ahead of us if you can see it.
You are going to seem a lot of developments over the next 5 to 10 years. Google now and Apple Siri are only the beginning and in 5 years time they will be able to do all manner of things. Keep an eye on the "internet of things" this will be a field were people will be able to make massive amounts of money study embedded systems to be able to take advantage of this.
The only feasible way to human like intelligence AI is to have an evolutionary process, similar to how we evolved, that will create intelligence indirectly. We can't evolve systems well inside a computer, as the environment in which something evolves is not complex and rich enough (indeed that is the main problem, it's easy to simulate a single cell inside a computer, but not the environment in which it lives).
The problem that the number of ways of reformulating the problem are often huge. It's as if once we know the answer, e.g. with the chessboard problem, reformulating the problem is easy. So we can only reformulate the problem once we know the answer, so it doesn't get us anywhere.
There are many uncomfortable aspects to AI interaction. I would say by the time we reach that level of technology we as people will have evolved to a point were violence like this will not exist. Over the next 15 years google glass and IBM watson type technologies will merge with out intelligence and this will lead to a period in the 2020s were we technology and science will move so rapidly that we today call it a technological singularity.
Hell yeah! But would it be ethical to put an inteligence inside a video game? Imagine GTA 10 where AI begs for its life (if it is an individual, virtual AI with reproductional and survival instincts)... So if you kill an AI in the virtual world without it having the possibility to load it self with the same information it had before it died... I'm not sure what you would call that.. The AIs would probably group up to kill our avatars in the most efficient way possible. :P
That would be interesting and ironic because if the AI were self aware it would almost be like we were the gods just randomly appearing in their world but we would be very stupid gods who were not nearly as intelligent as they 😂
We have to make it create itself (learning, right from wrong(taboos), walking, comunicating, etc...). There are people trying to make an artificial brain. You should look up "spaun brain" (Semantic Pointer Architecture Unified Network) on youtube. It is said to be "the most realistic human brain yet".
