CSU Analytical Resources Core supports cutting-edge STEM research and development programs by providing access to analytical instrumentation, expert guidance, research training and services to CSU and the broader community. We aim to foster a collaborative, inclusive learning and service environment where researchers can obtain valuable data and insights driving scientific progress and new discoveries. Our Research Resource ID is SCR_021758.
This RU-vid account is officially recognized by Colorado State University; however, the views and opinions expressed on this page are not necessarily those of the University. CSU retains discretion to allow or disallow comments and/or posts on this page. For more information about CSU’s Social Media Policy, visit www.socialmedia.colostate.edu
So, like at 4:15 or so.. it's essentially the same thing two opposing magnets do at a macro scale, but instead atomically eh? So then does it actually transfer resonance in a more classical form, functionally? But obviously with molecular and atomic implications.
Perhaps a few other related links can be helpful here: MRI superconducting magnet dangers - ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-6pPVLX7pduc.html (admittedly not laboratory magnet yet demonstrates some features) MRI magnet quench: the movie - ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-9SOUJP5dFEg.html (to see what a big quench actually looks like)
Yes, but you must use an analytical standard to quantify one specific molecule in your sample. For each new molecule you want to quantify, you need to have the corresponding analytical standard
@@federicocortese777 Thanks for the reply. We have been trying with a standard for a particular compound but the response for the same concentration of the standard is changing in every analysis. What could be the reason?
I think make sure the condition is the same and when preparing standard make sure it is always the same and also the standard compound should be pure and try playing with solvent assuming you are injecting direct without using.
Thanks for the video. What's the difference between oversize and undersize and which one gives better representation if you're studying smaller particle distribution?