Do true conspiracies really occur? We answer your most curious questions on the topics of conspiracy theories facing society as we get behind the truth separating fact from speculation exposing the secret agendas and workings of the Secret Societies exposing the NWO agenda with historical connections.
Social commentary offering "A rational voice in a world of conspiracy." We make sense of the accusations with rational breakdown.
Get ready to have your paradigm shifted as we give our social commentary on secret agendas behind social events, government systems, and the working of the "Shadow Government" behind the scenes. The channel presents fringe topics, news, and social analysis.
The website is JimDukePerspective.com
Patreon page is patreon.com/jimdukeperspective
This channel replaces the previous one that was censored and deleted by the powers-that-be.
I've heard an explanation of God-consciousness as: "a Christian's human spirit is God-conscious, his soul is society-conscious, and his body is nature-conscious". By Dr. Carl H. Stevens.
In this case the liar is the one who posted it as a phenomenon. The one who posted the original, the cameraman, the players in it were not intending to make a lying video I'm sure. The truthers spreading it as phenomenon are. They are the devils.
Republicans are moderate globalists now, while Democrats are ultra-globalists. But perhaps 50 years ago ultra-globalists looked like today's moderate ones.
Just think about this there are millions upon millions could even be billions of people that see the same "correlating changes" this is a mathematical impossibility and even stupid people can understand this., even though you cannot see it you can't change the facts. Personally speaking I've had some major changes, as an example the sun changing colors from yellow to white, the geography of the planet major changes for a continents have shifted literally over 2700 miles south America now lines up east coast of the U S, and our position within the Milky Way from Sagittarius arm to Orion's spur. There's a reason why most people can't see the changes, and the reason is because they're in their native indigenous reality and the core of their reality is still intact, they have nothing to compare by so everything is just fine nothing major has changed for them. For the community of ME people, we have been completely displaced from our original reality and we are the visitors here in this ever-changing fractured reality, we can see the changes because they stick out like a sore thumb, we're no longer in Kansas.
Berenstien Bears. "I" have an anchor memory just as strong as yours. When I was a little kid, I remember calling them the Beren-STINE bears because I thought they must have something to do with Frankenstien. I didn't want to read the books because I thought they would be scary like the movie. My mom corrected me and told me that it was STEEN not STINE, and that I didn't need to be afraid of them. Very very strong memory, I remember laughing about it with my Mom after the fact. So how can we reconcile these two different memories that you and I have? You will never convince me that didn't happen to me as a little kid. And the memory makes no sense if it was always STAIN. If that were the case, the situation would never have come about in the first place.
So we then have a crossroads. However, keep in mind MY memory of it substantiates that it was how I remember it and it still remains today. I have the facts of physical proof behind my claim. It would be abstract to claim it is different supernaturally and has to be proven that it was changed since it is the same as it was to me. Therefore the burden of proof remains on you to have to show. And more than just based on a demographic of people who perhaps recited it wrong or saw it wrong subliminally, or who claim how they think they remember it. Mine substantiates the concrete proof of fact that remains. My claim is testable, yours would not be.And why would that one aspect about it have changed anyway? What rational reason would be the intention? Think about that please.
Gary is great!! He really helped me bridge the gap of the missing pieces.. I understood a good portion of the corruption and rott in our society ,but those missing pieces that Mr Wayne provides are crucial one's and helped me bring it back to God 🤍 I'm Eternally Greatful for that clarity that Gary helped to provide, its Unbelievably meaningful to me 💜❤ Truly doing the Lord's work
Hi Phil. Good message. Have you read any of Chris White books " False Christ" ? I think you would enjoy it - it goes along with what you were saying about the AC fooling people into believing he is the retur n of Christ. Anyway I remember that you mentioned Zerubbabel and I remember something I read in my study Bible. It said the Zech. 4:14 The two anointed ones ( two olive trees) are Joshua, representing the religious authority, and Zerubbabel representing civil authority, They are the archetypes of the two witnesses mentioned in Rev. 11:3,4. Interesting.
Hi Phil, It's nice to see you. I was a listener of Omega. Hope BDK is well. Miss you guys. Just a few pingbacks: I agree that we are the temple. I also agree that God doesn't desire a temple made with hands. However that doesn't mean people won't try to build one. I work in a jewish community and can share that they are awaiting another temple. It's an abominable thing that any Christ follower would contribute a penny towards it. It's worth noting that in second Thessalonians the greek word for temple that Paul uses refers to an actual building. I believe in other areas Paul uses a different greek word for temple when referring to the spiritual body. Currently, I lean toward both meanings. I believe there will be a third temple and I also believe that satan might very well indwell those who apostosize, in a way that Judas was indwelt before betraying Jesus. Betrayal is another key theme in the last days events before the revealing of the AC.
Blessings, Heather. Thanks for watching and listening. In both this interview and the book, I discuss how I think there will be a physical third temple as well as the AC seeking to gain entrance into believers by getting them to apostatize, worship him and take his mark. Regarding Paul’s use of ‘God’s temple’ in 2 Thessalonians 2. Naon theou is used by Paul in Eph 2:21, 1 Cor 3:16-17, & 2 Cor 6:16 speak about believers in Jesus. In fact, he never uses naon theous to talk about a physical structure. It is used elsewhere in the Gospels that way, but not by Paul. Thus, it would seem most probable that in 2 Thess 2:4 he has believers in mind, though I believe he is also speaking of an eschatalogical house for lawlessness which is called God's Temple.
@@PhilBaker Interesting observations. Thanks Phil for replying. I agree that its possible to have that 2 fold meaning. I just read an article on the topic and the author made an interesting point I hadn't considered. Jesus, when under the law, would not have been allowed in the most holy place (naos) not being a Levitical priest. The author also said that when Judas threw the 30 pieces down in the temple it was in the naos, or the holy of holies. If his assertion is true it would seem that Judas was a Levitical priest. I have not confirmed that yet though. Edit: The greek word "naos" is used in Matthew when referring to Judas throwing down the money in the temple. He did it in the most holy place. This leads me to believe that Judas was a Levitical priest.
I am aware and agree with you that it does denote a physical temple in second Thessalonians but it would denote a physical Temple because the second temple was still standing. I don't claim to have it all figured out when it comes to eschatology and to be honest I just try to remain humble and ask that the Lord will reveal to me the things He would have me know.
@@PhilBakeryes It is a very good book and I think it may be the best so far except for New Wine skins and The Simple Word's Of Christ. It's definitely very close.
@@remnantreport8418 may I add that in my perspective even though many anticipate a physical third temple and say God doesn't need one but it won't stop people from building one, that still doesn't satisfy the requirement for a Third Temple as some suspect to be called a "Temple of God." Therefore it is a moot point whether there may be one or not because it isn't considered a temple of God, nor would satisfy any end time fulfillment because it isn't really for God nor would fulfill that statement to qualify.
