I really like the Canon RP. I shoot RAW and always get pretty good results. I rarely take my ISO above 400. It's a great first mirrorless full-frame system.
I think if you’re shooting video pretty much at all, the X-S20 is easily the better choice. I will say I enjoy the 7 custom save options on my X-E4(vs the X-S20’s only 4, but the X-S20 also has the newer more film sims)!🙏
??? I was looking for cameras for photography, because all you hear about these days is video performance... This video is NOT for people who wants to start their photography adventure! but for people who vant to start filming......
I really enjoyed your video! Great advice I hope to incorporate soon as I transition from real estate photography to primarily architectural and interiors.
To be honest, OM-1 and OM-5 at this moment, is more then we need in mirrorless world. It outperforms Sony 7iv. Noise in Om-1 can be totally (almost) be removed in camera taking hi rs shots or few same shots and marge them in body only as an overlay process. If you like DSLR, go for Pentax FF or APSC, those are awesome. If you want MFT, go for m4/3 system.
Nothing beats nikon z5 for the price the only camera hate the most is canon r8 it is a scam over price no image stabilization .. I think I stay with sony a7iv or save money get canon r5
Hi, first of all this is an excellent review, thank you. However I do want to take issue with you regarding just one thing at 02:03 you say that the next version should have the full side hinged flip out screen so that we can film or photograph ourselves. Seriously! This is one of the reasons we are now inundated with these damn screens, because RU-vidrs moan about not being able to do selfies. The screen you say it should have is slow, conspicuous and obtrusive, the tilt screen we have here is already perfect. I mean seriously who would spend £7k on a camera to do selfies and to film yourself. Please just stop asking for this damn screen, enough is enough. Thank you.
I agree! Love my Fuji GFX 100 ii. For taking photos, this screen is definitely superior to the tilty flippy screens. For filming yourself, one can use a monitor and a tripod, which is far more practical anyways since absolutely no one will seriously vlog with this camera. I use the Ninja V+ and it works fantastic.
I do agree with you. For professional work I prefer this type of screen or the one that you find in Sony A7III. For nowadays standards though I think panasonic's screen solution is the best - you can use it according to your preference.
Hi Jacek, sorry but this video is about nothing. Title suggest that viewers will get a bunch of tips where to start or whar are todays' trend in earning on making photos. But nothing like this
Even at full price, this lens is worth it for the R7. The IBIS works very well, almost always gets the image. Only weakness is if you are panning or walking shooting video, then the corners will show noticeable wobble. For photos it's nearly perfect.
In postproduction I desaturate yellows and magentas, also rise illumination of both. The other thing is correcting white balance and sliding lights slider in curves section.
I have a very entry level camera canon 2000d.....im wondering what you would recommend for a upgraded camera.....for sports photography (softball)......looking for camera and lens around the 2k-3k usd price point
I just received mine yesterday! I had a tamron 70-200 g2 f2.8 on my canon 5d mk4 fullframe few years ago, and it was my favorite lens. I went to apsc for a while and got rid of it, then switched to Sony. Hoping to get similar results!
Ta... stock photo. Sprzedaz 1 zdjecia na 10000 ? Jest takie powiedzenie: chcesz zarobi pieniadze na fotografii ? Sprzedaj kamere. Dlatego wielu fotografow ma kanal na RU-vid by sobie dorobic bo tj. slaby business fotografia.
