Judge that does not feel fair. The plaintiff gives money out of her heart and love for the children and to help the mother with raising them properly. It is a gift unless the plaintiff, the mother does not put the children in any danger. This is not confusing, it is a love transaction, a love agreement. I agree that the plaintiff could stop giving money if the mother does something that is not right for the children. But she loves these children and it is not easy to just leave. She tried to use the court to make the mother understand that love has obligations and she should be grateful. The ruling was wrong in many levels.
Segment two: It is clear that this Helena woman has a case of the light's on but there's no one home syndrome! I'm glad her friend won the case! And my advice to her is ditch Helena, you showed her you cared for her but she did not and will never listen to you!
How ignorant can two “people” be?? The daughter lacks common sense, decency, responsibility, morals and ethics! The mother is just 💯 ignorantly STUCK ON STUPIDITY OF A COCK ROACH for NOT exhibiting the behavior her child “should” be emulating!!! Mom is appalling as a mother, neighbor and person!!!🤦🏽♀️🤦🏽♀️ Side Note: The daughter needs to take her valley girl wannabe ghetto attitude and audaciousness and DUMP IT LET IT’S HOT 🥵
I don't understand how black people keep giving our children over to the white devil to teach their children. ,this day care owner is an obvious racist ,she gains nothing for a lil black child succeed in anyway .
@@shurmabrathwaite4724 Is it like Support Court with Judge Vonda B, where it's based on real cases but recreated by (bad) actors, or is it just fake fake?
I disagree with the verdict! 1- that receipt may not have been for that purse. 2- the purse wasn’t brand new to be awarded the amount of a brand new purse. 3- if she is buying purses for $600, maybe she needs to get them covered under insurance. 4- sh!t happens! Take your loss of an overpriced material item & move on! 🙄
