The greatest sin a youtuber can commit is not adding the music used in the description. You got good choice of music in the intro, but what is the name? 😅
sadly the sand sounds you show off. i cant hear them at all. maybe my ears cant pick it up. i can hear the squaking at the beaches but not the desert sounds
I'd add some dots around Baltic sea as in Estonia and Latvia I know every second sand beach has squeaky sand. But overall theory of old mountain range is correct as our sand came from Scandinavian mountains which used to be 9km high but are grinded down to 2 km high. Scandinavian mountains were formed at the same time as in British isles where lots of dots are shown on map in Caledonian orogeny 490-390 million years ago.
I am totally putting this in the videogame being worked on. Instead of regular sand. Thank you for posting this. Its given rise to some really creative ideas.
I've never understood why dividing by zero is this massive deal that confuses everyone. you're dividing your total into zero parts, otherwise known as discarding, so it should return zero
The problem with taxing the rich, is that most countries already do, snd modt tax them significantly more than the middle and low class. The rich in most countries actually scpunt for the majority of their country's tax revenue. The reason why it seems like they srent paying their fair share, is because their networth is significantly higher than their physical revenue. They make a lot less money per year thsn their networth shows, simply because their networth is the total value of what they own. A billionaire doesnt make a billion every year, they are just worth that much because they own assets that have a combined value in the billions. You really can't tax assets too much, as that would just make rich people bankrupt, and stocks cant be taxed until they are sold because its impossible to tell what kind of profit the stock will produce until its sold. You could speculate, but unless the asset is sold, it wouldn't be feasible or sensible to tax them based on the value increasing, aka, a capital gains tax, aka, a horrible idea that always cause more yarm than good in any society that hss implemented it. This is partially because, assets also devalue. Imagine you own 1 million dollars worth of Apple stock, and it doubles in value because they just announced something game changing for the tech industry. With a capital gains tax of 10%, you would now owe the gov $200,000 simply because your stock increased in value. If you bought your stock for 1 million, sold for 2, you would profit $800,000. Sounds great! Until you realise, most rich people do not sell stock because it goes ip in value, they hold on to it. You are essentially forced to sell your stock to prevent a net loss of $200k, othersise you risk losing a lot more money if apple stock value goes down. Say you pay the 200k, then suddenly, news breaks that this new apple product was a total failure, and now their stock plummets in value. You just lost $200k in tax and have nothing to show for it as your stock went from $1 mill, to $2mill, to $500k. Unless the gov refunds your capitol gain tax, you have only lost money. They way rich people actually use their stock to buy stuff isnt by selling their stock, its by tsking loans and using their stock as collateral. With that $1 mill in apple stock, i can go to the bank, take a loan out for $100k, use $100k worth of my stock as collateral, guerenteeing the bank loses little to nothing if i default, giving me an amazingly low interest rste on said loan, allowing me to easy pay it back with my physical income that i receive from what ever pay check i am earning, or whenever i sell stock or othed assets. With that $100k, i can immediately spend all $100k instead of having to save it up over a period of time, allowing me to close on a time sensetive deal or such. Its useful if there is stock i want to own that i can't risk waiting on, or maybe a limited time sale for something i want. When i spend that money, i end up paying sales tax, thus, and when i finish paying off the loan, i keep all my stock, and can do it all over again. Many people call this a loophole to avoid paying tax, but it isn't, as im still paying tax when i spend that money, and if i do sell stock to pay off the loan, or i use some sort of income to pay off the loan, im paying taxes on said income or sale of assets. I do end up paying less in tax than if i had just sold $100k worth of stock to buy whst i wanted, but not much less. I hope this all made sense. In general, the rich do pay their fair share, they just go about spending their wealth differently than the average joe, who saves up their money to uy something rather than taking out a loan using their assets as collateral. Then again, even the average joe needs to use collateral to tske a loan, the difference is, they are at much more risk of losing a substantial amount of their wealth than a rich person who can afford to take large loans out to buy stuff. Oh bte, a capital gains tax would hurt the low and middle class substantially more than the rich, as aby increase in vsmue of our assets would be taxed, even if it goes back down in value, with the main difference between us middle and low class, and the rich, is the fact we cant afford such a tax, and could wasily lose everything over a speculated increase in wealth. It would force the middle and low class to sell off their assets every time they increased in value, even if only by a little, guuerenteeing that the only people left owning any assets are the rich.
it took scientists 100s of years to realize that the noise is just scraping against each other..... Where's my honorary PhD for understanding that the moment you showed a photo of the sand.... Same concept can be applied to so many different things.
When Louis IV was building the palace of versailles it had so many fountains they were never able to power them all at once. Different servants would run around turning them on and off as he walked within view lol. They diverted Different water sources and even started to build a Roman style auquaduct. All futile efforts.
our guy made a machine to demonstrate resonance instead of paying someone to make a cheap animation from fiverrrrrrrrr. this video is a masterpiece, great work
quartz - yep, guessed it. so it's like glass crying against each other. nice. also, great video, really good script and animation, one of your best for sure, your channel is fantastic. shame farms of morons creating wikipedia -> storyblocks -> 49 minute youtube videos are hoovering up watch time.
Except individual markets are not governed by supply and demand --NOT only due to regulations, but also due to market manipulation, as aellers and investors attempt to block competition so they can dictate prices
