Everly Zone goal is to serve as your go-to resource, offering detailed reviews of top brands and models in each product category. Such as Technology, Tools and Automotive. We aim to guide you towards the best online products, ensuring that you make informed decisions when it comes to purchasing. Trust us to provide in-depth information and valuable suggestions to enhance your overall shopping experience.
This one is not for me....just spec. reading and not based on user experiences. No mention of serious issues like S24 battery or any other users issues with either one of the phones.
Ultimately, think about your target audience and if they can tell the difference between the output of various cameras. The perfect camera is the one that provides the results you prefer, at the lowest possible cost. And remember, regardless of price, all cameras are capable of capturing a poorly composed image.
I was very tempted to replace a lost Fujifilm X100S with the Canon G1 X III, as I thought I wouldn't need to get the wide and tele converter to get the same reach. But the more photos I see taken with the Canon, the more the poor bokeh (not size of it, but quality) detracts me from getting one. Also the lens seems to be digitally corrected and that's part of that "small sensor compact camera" look I am not fond of. I think I will save and stick with Fuji.
I own the latest iPhone 15 Pro and still purchased the G5X Mark II…the phone is more than capable for most casual photography, especially if you mostly shoot wide shots (its main and ultra wide cameras are very good for a phone) but it quickly falls apart if you want to zoom, the 3x sensor is tiny and only produces okay looking shots in ideal lighting conditions, the camera blows it out of the water in this department and it’s not even close as it is using the same 1 inch type sensor to shoot the zoom shots and using optical zoom to do the magnification. TLDR: if you really take photography seriously then a dedicated premium point and shoot still makes a lot of sense to own.
One thing never mentioned in these comparisons is the flash power. I have a Nikon A900 and Sony RX100IV and consider them pretty poor as travel cameras, as the sun is behind my wife and friends a lot of the time, or for when shooting inside buildings or restaurants My old Nikon P7000 and my ancient Canon A710s still do a better job with their more powerful flashes Do any of these five cameras have decent flashes please? Regards.
I disagree with @michaelflinn7784. I have a Nikon DSLR and two Sony RX-100s: a I and a VI. They ARE expensive, but they're excellent cameras, with superb image quality, and they literally fit in my pants (or shirt) pocket. The I version is my normal walking-around camera, with the sharpest lens, but that lens only zooms to 100mm. The lens on the VI zooms to 200mm, but is not quite as sharp. I still like my Nikon, but only use it for specialized situations.
Only the Victron is a mppt charge controller. There is too many fake mppt solar charge controllers on the market. Do your homework before you hand over your hard earned cash...
What the Hell? No one is carrying 5lb Osprey/Granite Gear packs hiking. Not willingly anyways. And certainly NOT at the top of the list. If the pack doesn't weigh less than 3lbs, no one is buying them who has any knowledge of backpacking. Hyperlight, zpacks, Gossamear gear, ULA circuit, and yes, Osprey ... but NONE of the Osprey or Granite gear packs shown but rather the MUCH smaller sub 3 lb packs like the Exos
None of the TV's for 500 r as good as a 1000 do you know what you r talking about you sound like a person that only play at 60 Hz most TV's r to Big for PC and not optimal aswell and don't go and say bs
If video is not your thing . Sony Rx100 ( original) is still one of the best out there for photos. Love it so much I later bought Sony rx100 va and Sony zv-1 ( for video)
Yes, except they are going the way of the dinosaurs it would appear. Point and shoot cameras in general. Try to find one, just the camera, not a package deal. Not easy.
What??? No mention of the Canon G1X Mark III. It’s no bigger than my G5X, yet it carries a 24.2 Megapixel full sized CMOS (APS-C) sensor. So, you can skip the one-inch sensor. I’ve got several cameras that sit on the shell waiting to get some use since I got this beast.
