So glad you approve of and like Dickens and it's small wonder that the Russian people took, and still take him, to their hearts as one of themselves. 🤔( "Green Fire", geoff nelson hill, author ) 🌈🦉 PS: Dostoyevsky has likewise been charged with "sentimentality" of course.
Do we have to end, no pun intended, with this last painting depiction-could we not throw up another great architectural foundational such as a church or castle?
Why Grayling have you been silent on the is ought gap the inference deductive gap and the subjective objective gap in ethics? Seems you could have spoken up and you did not.
Clearly this video was made before Biden was elected, about four years ago. Yet is was posted only four months ago! Why the delay? Still fascinating views from Anne Applebaum.
Thomson's misgivings about Vertigo - 'morbid' !? A study of dizzying obsessive love where the usually amiable Jimmy Stewart transformed - rendered with cinematography and a score that swirl - yet Thomson prefers set-bound, voyeuristic Rear Window? And I did find Thomson's Dictionary often dismissive of emotionalist directors I admired eg Visconti and Schlesinger. His short shrift of John Ford angered many though that wouldn't be why. But some interesting generalisitions here.
Can't think of a definition of 'evil' that would put St Paul into THAT category. But 'crazy' seems more feasible. Maybe 'crazy' like someone who cryogenically preserves their cadaver in the expectation of a future technological resuscitation. Or maybe 'crazy' like someone who claims to have found-- or almost discovered-- the 'singularity' of all reality. Or maybe crazy like someone who claims to have discovered the/ a 'fountain of youth.' Or maybe 'crazy' like those who believe that this seemingly endless cycle of life and death spontaneously emerged from nothing and will return to nothing taking them back into the old nothing-- or maybe they'll spontaneously emerge into some new unimaginable nothing that could only be produced by eons of time. Or maybe 'crazy' like those who believe that the inanimate cosmos is eternal and all anima will finally evolve into something equally as persistent. Or maybe 'crazy' like that other famous Anglican of the previous generation who tried to prevent the educational system from making "the 'trousered ape' and the 'urban blockhead' [who] really hold that the ordinary human feelings about the past or animals or large waterfalls are contrary to reason and contemptible and ought to be eradicated."
@@UnconventionalReasoning dude the bible, Paul (Saul) said it himself “Galatians 1:13-23 - For you have heard of my former manner of life in Judaism, how I used to persecute the church of God beyond measure and tried to destroy it; and I was advancing in Judaism beyond many of my contemporaries among my countrymen, being more extremely zealous for my ancestral traditions. …I was still unknown by sight to the churches of Judea which were in Christ; but only, they kept hearing, "He who once persecuted us is now preaching the faith which he once tried to destroy.” Leave your echo chamber and read a book. You can even get NT Wright’s book about Paul. You might learn something. Now I understand your name.
… as a German Biologist - I first heard of Russell in our German High School 1970 in 10 th Grade With an excellent amazing English Teacher Russell is a sort of Nietzschean Über Mensch A Renaissance Man Poly Math Mind Boggling In my view He represents the End of Humanity - as we genetically waste each other to Oblivion Nature Helps To get rid of us…
41:45 wheels are made of organic material and so would unlikely to show up in the archaeological record. Also as for the "hundreds of years of planning" seem very far fetch, considering the political and social change that would have accord during that time.
