Thanks to @alexandrosmartinez508 @RaptorGirlLogoArchive2 and @TropicsAndFood ,the obscure, rare obsolete footage of Oliver and Company's real variant of the 1985 walt disney pictures logo is rediscovered and fully digitized for the first time.
Thanks to @alexandrosmartinez508 @RaptorGirlLogoArchive2 and @TropicsAndFood ,the obscure, rare obsolete footage of Oliver and Company's real variant of the 1985 walt disney pictures logo is rediscovered and fully digitized for the first time.
Well, it's actually real. The original 1985 darker blue semi circle logo is finally found, thanks to me. Here's the video source: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-XNNcfndthYk.html
I downloaded it when it was first available. At first I was doubtful about its authenticity. But when it disappeared I rediscovered the video in my folder and uploaded it here
During production of this film, Daisy Ridley sadly revealed that she had been diagnosed with Graves' disease, a condition caused by a hyperactive thyroid gland.
This actual clip of the lost logo is also a response to @logoboy95returns version of this logo became he knowingly faked it all along ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-fcNTYr_ymJs.htmlsi=MhqZpItRbS3v_4mg
This actual clip of the lost logo is also a response to @logoboy95returns version of this logo became he knowingly faked it all along ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-fcNTYr_ymJs.htmlsi=MhqZpItRbS3v_4mg
This vhs opening video is a response to @logoboy95returns fake Oliver and company video ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-fcNTYr_ymJs.htmlsi=MhqZpItRbS3v_4mg
P.S, this French disc "might or might not used a telecine of an interpositive, which is a couple generations before the release prints? Colour grading wise, they can look similar, but it's more likely that they did video transfers from IPs rather than release prints, which would look comparatively more dirty, grainy and slightly worn out than a carefully saved interpositive. As for why the US home video and Disney+ prints have the newer logo, my guess is that the negative was cut with the newer logo's internegatives spliced in place of the older logo, and the video transfers were made from interpositives struck sometime between 1995-1996 for its 1996 re-release in theaters, and the 2013 remaster on Blu-ray and Disney+ most likely used a newer scan of either The IPs created for the re-release or the negatives used in making those IPs, INs and release prints at the time. That likely means of a new 4K scan was performed of the OCNs and they wanted to use the older Disney logo, they'd probably have to scan the logo from another Disney movie of similar vintage (I.e., Honey, I Shrunk the Kids) and digitally edit that into the DI for the hypothetical remaster, which is not far off from how Universal often did it with their own catalog titles from the 70s, 80s, and even 90s and 2000s, recycling logo scans and reusing the same exact few telecines over and over again unless otherwise. I don't recall the Coca-Cola logo being censored in '96, but having no '88 footage on hand nor baae of reference, I still believe that it probably happened on either home video telecines, CG'd internegatives spliced into the OCNs for the re-release, or maybe original '88 release negatives for the international markets in some countries, similar to the opticals that sometimes are inserted into translated prints of some movies. Probably the companion DVD that came with the Blu-ray that was "piss poor" by DVD standards. The older DVDs utilised the 1996 telecines created for VHS and LaserDisc releases, all minted from interpositives struck from the tweaked negatives cut for the 1996 theatrical re-release, though they did not recycle the non-anamorphic encode for the LD, but rather re-encoded from the possibly HDVS or early HD source for that transfer. A DNR'd filter on a newer IP scan is probably also comparatively more piss poor than a judiciously DNR'd OCN scan or a straight but cleaned up and restored OCN scan too. I feel like a 4K restoration from the OCNs for Oliver & Company is long overdue at this point, and even the transfers from when they didn't know how to make good transfers deserve to have info as to what sources were used to make them. (OCNs or Interpositives)
@@TropicalHonduranDominican I’m guessing that you’re partial to 16mm or 35mm film stock. I do have a couple of frames that are in IMAX film stock. I believe that’s the largest film format in existence.
