Theoretical / mathematical physics at the graduate level and above. This is NOT a popular science channel. Here you find real theoretical physicists doing real theoretical physics. We think it is important for people to get a taste of the real deal, and for aspiring theoretical physicists to see what they are working towards, i.e., to provide the public with something beyond the ubiquitous Michio Kaku and Brian Cox.
I'm gutted, I'm looking for a 3 part course in quantum field theory to get as much depth as MIT's quantum field theory courses and i was hoping this was it but its only in 360p! So close but yet so far. Perhaps I will just watch it over and over. I'm possibly desperate enough 🤦♂Thank you for all your course uploads anyway.
Richard Feynman is very charismatic an excellent physics professor it’s it’s kind of funny you know finding professors like this is kind of a diamond it doesn’t but this one is seriously a rare professor
The Twin Paradox just showcases how stupid Einstein really was. Whats even worse, the entire scientific community bought into his flat earth fantasy universe. Gravity is the force that keeps objects from floating away on a stationary plane. Do people really think that the earth is flat? Why are they still using physics developed for a stationary plane? Relativity? F=ma depicts an unbounded, infinite universe. Motion is relative. E=mc. The universe is bounded by (c). Motion is absolute. Relativity only comes in to play when dealing with how fast two frames are accelerating towards (c). Synchronized clocks? They measure relative motion in space. The one with the slower running clock is measuring more motion/distance in space. There is no special relativity because motion is absolute. The laws of physics apply equally in all frames of reference. Including the separate frames of space and time. Whether vertical or horizontal or a rotating disc. Whether 2d, 3d or 1d in the case of a photon. Its mass is its wavelength. E=mc. Acceleration defines/creates mass. Not the other way around. Mass attraction was disproved in the 1590s. And yet, the scientific community is still using stationary plane physics. Why?
This is real theoretical physics. When I was an undergraduate we had a few lecturers who taught this way on a blackboard, one even didnt say anything throughout, just came in the room, started writing on the blackboard for an hour, then left. There were no lecture notes, so we had to pay a lot of attention and copy correctly, or a lot of confusion later.
Hello, I have a question. I am not very knowledgeable about the subject. These issues cannot be explained in such detail in my country. My question is, at 27.30 in the video, our teacher says that the machine guns shoot out by emitting a rapid pressure. My question is, he mentions that there is a high probability that the bullets will come out, but how can the probability remain high? And some guns can jam. What happens in this case? Thank you in advance for your answers.
