"I started this channel with the intention of supporting students who are genuinely interested in learning Economics. My goal is to provide them with a wide range of ideas and knowledge on various economic aspects, enabling them to learn and apply these concepts in their lives.
The purpose of my videos is to inspire, inform, and empower viewers to advance in their careers. I use a unique teaching method that not only helps my viewers learn but also equips them to teach others and enhance their skills.
My videos cover university-level academic courses, including undergraduate and postgraduate levels. They are designed to assist those preparing for UGC-NET exams and those who have chosen economics as an optional subject in their UPSC civil services exams."
Ai você vê que a sua vida tá complicada quando você tem que buscar ajuda num vídeo que nem entende a língua. Muito obrigado pela ajuda, professor. Continue seu trabalho. Acabou de ajudar um brasileiro do outro lado do mundo.
1. there is no crowding out effect has been given in terms of monetary policy, 2. which monetary policy you adopted in your second illustration sir..??.. expansionary or contractionary ..??.. crowding-Out effects are clear in terms of fiscal policy, but there are confusions around crowding-out effects related to the monetary policy.. Thank you..
sir, in entire video you just told that what we have to study but you didn't explained anything 😀. Video bana hi rahe ho toh padha bhi dete, only for views you're wasting students' time
can you derive the demands in these three cases to me according to law of demand will hold in all except giffen goods but according to You it holds only in case of normal goods not in inferior goods
again in case of normal goods IE>SE and in case of inferior goods SE>IE then law of demand should not hold either of two . but only Giffen goods is the exception to law of demand . Clarification needed sir plz
The substitution effect is always negative in terms of price and quantity demanded. The income effect can be positive or negative depending on whether the good is normal or inferior, and especially in the case of Giffen goods. For normal goods, the negative substitution effect is always less than the positive income effect. In the case of inferior goods, while the substitution effect is negative, it is greater than the negative income effect. However, for Giffen goods, the negative income effect is greater than the negative substitution effect.
@@Visioneconomics can you derive the demands in these three cases to me according to law of demand will hold in all except giffen goods but according to You it holds only in case of normal goods not in inferior goods
