they need to be stacked, 6 high and 20 wide, with elevators of course. heat, hydro, wifi can be bulk purchased and is included in the rent price. these could be the shelters for the immigrants, students, homeless elderly, etc etc tec.
Pretty Good! Floor plan would have been great but thats all they provided! Woa! Hold your horses, an exterior sewage stack & where's that legal?? I know they use them in the UK but here is Southern Ontario Interior sewage stacks without enough insulation will freeze up & we're about the warmest place in Canada during winter so their illegal here.
Now this is a house! Very nice! It would be awesome to see the same layout just with 40 ft contents for higher ceiling space that would be cooler in the hotter months
Nice, but 2 years later it will probably burn down due to all the wildfires California is prone to. There should be a strict no living in JH, and an intensive water irrigation system that triggers when temps hit a certain levels to cool that place down and put out fires immediately.
This home was designed by Graeme Addis and built as modules, transported to and assembled at Aongatete Katikati by ADDIS Containers Auckland New Zealand. Graeme Addis designed the Long Bay Cafe, Long Bay, Auckland. That design work was plagiarised by the constructor as his own creation and submitted to become the winner of the supreme title at the 2013 ADNZ Resene Architectural Design Awards.
@@CCM1199 obviously you've never slept next to unblocked window in the middle of the night in the middle of nowhere... That isn't private at all. The absence of evidence isn't the evidence of absence my friend. 😊
People w/out neighbors - b/c they own the 50 acres surrounding the house..... not for me, though. Too much desert (134°F), and not anywhere near civilization.
This house is fine like it though I would never live among snakes, scorpion's and what ever. I don't se any defense against these nor do I understand the structural integrity of the living/dining and kitchen area. but all in all a like it.
Looks like there wasn't made a provision for maintenance in the budget. Painting particularly, and then it looks like over crowding, due to the lack of affordable places in London to move to after.
One key factor in the project's challenges was a lack of ongoing maintenance for the temporary housing. Even short-term solutions require regular care, just like anything else.
Property was neglected, looks like it was a sinister neglect too. That part of West London isn't exactly a poor area. Maybe they didn't want the residents the apartment scheme was giving homes to. If you know what I mean.
В социальном жилье проблема не в зданиях, а в социальой части, т.е. в людях. дом в контейере очень жестко ограничен в размерах, я вижу 3 пути 1. облагораживать придомовую территорию и включать её, и за счет больших окон визуально, это пространство в жилую зону 2.делать стены слайдеры раздвижными 3. использовать для домов другой тип контейнеров. на сайте производителя контейнеров с удивлением узнал, что есть контейнеры с высотой 3200 мм, и шириой 3200 мм. просто ширина 2500 мм задана правилами дорожого движения, как и высота 4000-4300 мм. думаю, для портовых городов не будет проблемой перемещать грузы в контейнерах шириной 3200 мм, и это упростит перевозку негабаритных товаров. эту тему должны пролоббировать крупные компании типа Амазон, Маерск...
There were a few problems with the original unit's layout's that made it unfit for people with existing emotional/mental health issue's! There's studies going back decades in the US/Can showing that small dark living spaces affect peoples mental health over the long term! How Asian's in Hong Kong or other cities aren't affected I've no idea, but their not. There's been problems with single wide's for indigent/drug recovery/students for decades in Europe! Container City II built in 2002 in London designed things very differently with more cans per apartment, they cut out the interior walls to create larger spaces(with larger windows too) & the smallest space was a doublewide 20' container apartment for a single person(with a floor to ceiling window/door + a window like the ones in this building). So a single apartment was 16'x20'=320' for one person, double what they gave them in this creation. They had triple wide units with all the interior walls cur out to... as well as 40' double wides with 640' for one person. Motels/Hotels are being converted into micro apartments this size & their laid out very differently in part due to previous layout as a hotel room of course but with a much more open space & larger windows with much more light.
обычно люди в тини хаусах только скрываются от непогоды и спят, а живут на придомовой территории, здесь же мало пространства вне железой коробки. возможно к каждому контейнеру, или одно на 2 контейнера, следовало присоедиить открытое солнечное патио как тусовочное место. а рости вверх, добавив пару этажей (в россии здания с этажностью более 5, должны оснащаться лифтами,-может и в этом проблема тоже)
Let‘s just be honest. The housing isn't the problem here , the people are. They could have been given nice Victorian terrace houses, and the result would have been identical. It‘s a major social issue. For most of these cases people are completely disenfranchised with living in society. Not saying it‘s their fault (entirely), but this isn‘t the solution... it‘s way deeper.
The paint was sub standard to start with. Maintenance seems to have been ignored. I generally love large projects like this and other ones that are older are still in good shape. So sorry to see this project decay.
The project was well done. I guess it's the management part that became a challenge especially the social aspect. They needed to understand their tenant mix better.
It doesn't matter what you make it out of if you dont maintain it then it will fall apart.looks like the term 'temporary housing' works two ways with this one
Building is only as good as the maintenance and tenant mix... One was given to be of questionable character but the other you don't generally expect. At least in such a short time frame from opening to demolition? 7 years... Not a good look...
1. Clearly sub-standard material and finishes 2. Obviously no supervision and or follow-up on tenants moving in 3. Missing Tenant Rules 4. Clearly no security 5. Deferred or non-existent maintenance etc. etc.
Yes but the main factor behind it failed is maintenance. Also remember it is supposed to be temporary. But even at that maintenance is the key. Setting up anything and not looking after will eventually fall apart. Even as humans we have to look after ourselves, else one will find themselves 6 feet under before they know it.
