Helping students smash their A-Level, GCSE, BTEC, IB and international exams.
We aim to provide high quality, simple study, revision and exam technique videos and livestreams. Our video style is simple - professional explanation of what you need to know and how to demonstrate those crucial exam skills.
We hope you find these videos useful. If you do, please SUBSCRIBE to the channel and SHARE with your friends.
Want to ask a question? Just use the video comments. Thanks!
Very useful video! On question 4 of the bubble quiz (11:00) , wouldn't A also be a correct answer? From my understanding, let's say there was a building blocking an air canyon in an urban area which will therefore force wind to scale the wall and go over the top or around the side of this building. After the air has travelled over the top of the building, it can be sucked down due to the difference in pressure as this area is sheltered from the wind meaning there is less air traffic, compared to above the building which has a fast flowing movement of the air. When the air is pulled down behind the building, the majority of it is goes down at an angle a few metres past the building, this pushes the air on the ground to the face of the back of the building which then makes a smaller amount of air go up the backside of the building. when this smaller airflow reaches the top of the building, it is met with the much stronger current of air which then pushes it down at a shallower angle effectively making a vortices or swirling air. I can sometimes see this with dust or leaves. Hopefully the explanation makes sense. I read an article a few months ago however that was articulated much better.
Is it concrete that Pluralism claims that there is no object truth? Does it not make more sense for there to be object truth but for the understandings of these truths to be split up into the differing perspectives of each person observing them? Like for example, a red apple is always red and there’s no arguing that someone’s ‘perspective’ says it’s green when it clearly isn’t. Maybe when you say there is no object truth it’s only being pointed towards complex ideas like religion or politics where there tends to a chaotic mix of right and wrong. In which case we find people arguing when both people are right, and also when both people are wrong. Surely if we could come together and decide on a baseline of ideas that unite us that we could all work together in preserving we could then discuss more volatile topics without the need for extreme devision and violence?
Sir.ako lang ginagawa nila groups ng matagal nililigaw nila taon taon .bakit sila lang ang mabuhay dito sa Mondu.laban din ako basta May basihan ng Philhealth original.kahit kulani n nila ako para wala sila pakinabangan taon taon wala tumutulong sakin kahit isang tao wala.personal kasi ako talaga ginagawa groups Jan nalalamonin nila .
Sir.mam.yes wala ako ginawa groups ginawa project ginawa Groups 4ps IPS kaya iwan .dinaaalis pangloloko pagsasamantala kahit offecjals jan.diako naninilaw ay matitino offecjals.
Ann Oakley, with her work of which she is proud, de facto normalized mental disorder and thereby destabilized the foundations on which civilization rests. This lie passed in the West, where democracy and freedom of speech were used to impose this dysphoria as a normal and desirable phenomenon, not for the purpose of helping people affected by this disease, but as a tool in the fight against the West. Breaking up the family and neglecting biology is not science, but an attempt to introduce a "post-scientific" look at society, which leads to its collapse. Ann Oakley will be remembered as one of the most bizarre phenomena in the humanities, and her actions, when all the consequences, social conflicts and ruined lives of teenagers who had the misfortune of being touched by this ideology are added up, will be the most blatant example of destructive social action within the academy. The consequences have long been visible in the West through tens of thousands of ruined young people who have completed indoctrination at universities that teach "gender science". One only has to read books and listen to the statements of people who, in their teenage years, went through the torture of chemical castration, sterilization, puberty blockers and surgical removal of breasts and reproductive organs. Humanity has never encountered such bizarreness in its history since this deeply evil person appeared on the scene.
Free markets do not need government regulation - then, they xease being a free market. Rather, they are regulated by the "invidible hand of the free market." Certain bad behabiors can and should absolutely be punished (theft, fraud, etc.). But, that is punishment after the fact, not regulation beforehand.
ive decided to switch subject/career path to business instead of physics and chem. i havent studied business since 7th grade...i will be entering grade 12 and if everything goes well i will be doing my unit 1 and unit 2 exam in oct/nov maybe even in jan series if possible. id like to know if you can give me resources or link for new students taking ial edexcel business unit 1 and 2 and whether im making the right decision changing late and if business is really hard or just takes common sense on real life scenario
