This channel is for Advocates, Law Students, CS Students, CA Students, Candidates who are preparing for Judicial Officer Exams, Legal Officer Exams, Assistant Public Prosecutors Exams, Law Entrance Exams, Law related Exams, CLAT, SLAT, LLM Entrance Exams, AIBE, UPSC Law (Optional) Exam, Competitive Examinations and also general Public who wants to know about Laws. Subscribe to this channel for getting the latest updates about the videos on Law. Happy Learning
Regards Success Law Classes WhatsApp Contact No: 8985740104
It is highly inappropriate for a judge, sitting in such a high position, to make sweeping and dismissive remarks about the RTI Act and its applicants. This kind of behavior is uncalled for. Accusing the lawyer of being part of a "setup" only raises questions about the judge's own impartiality, especially after showing such disregard for the RTI Act of 2005. It now appears as though the judge herself may be aligned with corrupt bodies attempting to withhold information from citizens. The judge's initial demand for the lawyer to provide reasons for filing the RTI application was not only inappropriate but also a clear violation of Section 6(2) of the RTI Act, 2005. This section clearly states that an applicant “shall not be required to give any reason for requesting the information.” Furthermore, most of the information the lawyer sought under the RTI was already covered under Section 4(1)(b) of the Act, which mandates that such information should be disclosed proactively on public authority websites. In this case, the lawyer shouldn't have had to file an RTI at all, had the authorities fulfilled their obligations. The arrogance with which the judge has handled such a crucial issue, especially when the RTI Act is struggling to survive in this country, undermines the very essence of transparency and accountability. It is deeply troubling, particularly at a time when the right to information is more vital than ever.
Hats off to Ladyship, those people who cannot bear a woman voicing her strength and valuable time will talk negatively . Kudos to the judgement of Bilkis Bano and demonetization
I dont understand its citizens right to know information about public bodies right? Is there any ban on advocates? I think ladyship sensed lack of bonafides.
What nonsense it is.... She can't ask reason as per RTI.…...And if he is not getting information then definitely he will approach higher judiciary ....Threatening for cost is really nonsense
It is a senior judge BV Nagarathna... She is not scared of doing the right thing including giving bilkis bano, demonitisation dissent, justice by overturning SC 's own judgement
सहारा की गलती की सजा आम जनता को नहीं मिलनी चाहिए हुज़ूर, 600000ऐजट एंड 1000000करोड़ जमाकार्ता का क्या होगा सर 🙏🏻🌹🙏🏻भुगतान कैसे होगा 🙏🏻🌹🙏🏻आपसे हम सारे ऐसे आशा लगाए थे, बट अफ़सोस केवल केवल सहारा सेबी की बात हुई आम जनता की बात नहीं हुई महोदय कुछ कीजिये नहीं तो अब देर हो जाएगी, हम सब पैसा जमा किये अपने पेट काट कर बट ये क्या होगा सर, यह कहानी कोइ नहीं भूलेंगे 🙏🏻🌹🙏🏻
N what is this nonsense…practice on your profession ?? Justice pervades every particle & I am an advocate of justice….he must have confronted her…..I am sorry, this is very sorry state of affairs