Welcome to ''Bible Ebooks'' , your guiding light through the sacred scriptures. Here, we delve into the profound wisdom and enduring stories of the Bible, bringing them to life with insightful discussions, detailed explanations, and inspiring lessons. Whether you're a lifelong believer or just curious about the scriptures, our channel is designed to illuminate your path with faith, understanding, and spiritual growth.
Join us as we explore the depths of the Old and New Testaments, uncover the historical contexts, and apply biblical truths to modern life. From Genesis to Revelation, our videos are crafted to enhance your knowledge and deepen your faith. Subscribe and turn on notifications to never miss our weekly uploads. Le t'' Bible Ebooks '' be your spiritual compass, guiding you towards a more enlightened journey with each video.
Leviathan lived in the ocean. Did Noah take fish on the ark? Seems to me anything that lives in the ocean would not need an ark. Logic would dictate that ocean dwelling creatures would not have drowned.
Just driving through the mountains or studying real history proves the biblical flood. Got be brain dead to think all this is an accident. Must be a Dr. Fauci believer
The facts are that once it got over the embarrassment of Galileo, Christianity has had a legacy of encouraging scientific research, building on the belief that all of nature is God’s creation. Through modern science, science literate Christians have become increasingly aware of how their God crafted the universe around them. Hundreds of years of research in geology, paleontology, biology, and many other fields have produced abundant evidence that the earth is billions of years old and that fossils, geological features, and the diversity of life formed over eons of time. Additionally, there is an abundance of empirical evidence that there was never a global flood, and as a consequence no ark. The flood story is FILLED with hyperbole that would have been recognized by its ancient audience as a figurative description of an event in order to produce an effect and make a theological point, and NOT an example of ancient journalism or accurate science.
The man is with God and God takes him. God allows his Angels to show Enoch everything but somehow the manipulators on earth say The Book Of Enoch is not inspired by God Enoch knew more than science and even knew of Jesus Yeshua Christ
After you die you’ll be away from the body and will immediately face judgement (Hebrews 9:27). Don’t forget we are all sinners and all fall short in the glory of God. So, do not expect that you will be in the glory of God. You need to pay for your sin until you’re purified like Gold and silver. Unless, you know your savior and follow him, and thru faith you will be saved.
This video isn't about Christians (God's Children) : 1 John 3-8 -10, "Anyone who keeps on sinning belongs to the devil. He has sinned from the beginning, but the Son of God came to destroy all that he has done. God's children cannot keep on being sinful. His life-giving power+ lives in them and makes them his children, so they cannot keep on sinning. 1You can tell God's children from the devil's children, because those who belong to the devil refuse to do right or to love each other." This person is lying about the truth, in this video (Proverbs 12:22, "Lying lips are an abomination to the Lord, but those who act faithfully are his delight")
There should not be a small group of people who dictate what's allowed to stay in the Bible. There's way more than 66 book's too and I'm sure full of knowledge that would have benefited everyone of course. So only evil people would hoard the knowledge from the world.
The story of the giants is very intriguing and yet so confusing. I would need to watch this video a few times in order to fully get a better understanding.
Complete nonsense. Once it got over the embarrassment of Galileo, Christianity has had a legacy of encouraging scientific research, building on the belief that all of nature is God’s creation. Through modern science, Christians are becoming increasingly aware of how their God crafted the universe around them. Hundreds of years of research in geology, paleontology, biology, and many other fields have produced abundant evidence that the earth is billions of years old and that fossils and geological features formed through many processes over eons of time. Additionally, there is an abundance of empirical evidence that there was never a global flood, and as a consequence no ark. The flood story is FILLED with hyperbole that would have been recognized by its ancient audience as a figurative description of an event in order to produce an effect and make a theological point, and NOT an example of ancient journalism or accurate science.
Another video lying about Lennox "destroying" Atheism. The John Lennox method of debate: Step 1: Lie about having evidence for your beliefs. Step 2: Claim your feelings are evidence. Step 3. Lie about having presented evidence for your beliefs.
Cutting of roots that’s how giants came back through pharmacy it tells you in Jubilees they found stone tablets of the watchers cutting of roots makes things bigger and that’s how they came back brother
Here is America in prophecy: We can know "when" we are on God's prophetic calendar. It is written in the book of 2nd Esdras. Chapter 11 contains a prophecy that describes a line of American presidents, four of whom are still alive, and two of them are being kept until "the end." All of them are old men. "The end" is fast approaching. I have condensed the prophecy into a series of short lessons - my gift to you. Please allow me to guide you through them, step by step, and into understanding. Blessings to you and your loved ones.
John Lennox's speech presents an articulate case for the compatibility of science and faith in God, but from an atheistic perspective, several counterarguments can be made. 1. False Dichotomy Argument Lennox argues against a false dichotomy between faith and science, likening it to choosing between Henry Ford and mechanics to explain the existence of a car. However, this analogy is problematic. Ford's role as the inventor is clear and historically documented, whereas the existence of a supernatural creator for the universe is not empirically verifiable. Science provides naturalistic explanations based on evidence, while faith in a deity involves accepting supernatural claims without empirical proof. The two serve different purposes: science seeks to explain how the universe operates based on observable evidence, whereas faith in God often addresses questions of meaning and purpose, which are inherently subjective. 2. Faith as Rational Evidence Lennox posits that belief in God is based on rational evidence, citing the complexity of natural phenomena and the existence of human consciousness as indicators of intelligent design. However, complexity and consciousness can be explained by natural processes like evolution and neurobiology. The argument from design assumes that complexity requires a designer, but this is a philosophical assertion, not a scientific one. Science often finds that what appears complex can arise from simple natural processes over time, as demonstrated by the theory of evolution. 3. Historical Examples of Religious Scientists Lennox references historical figures like Isaac Newton and Galileo, who were both scientists and believers. However, this historical context doesn't necessarily validate the truth of their religious beliefs. Many scientists of the past were religious because that was the prevailing worldview of their time. Importantly, their scientific discoveries were made using empirical methods that are separate from their religious beliefs. Science has progressed significantly since their time, often challenging and revising earlier religious interpretations of the natural world. 4. Fine-Tuning and the Cosmological Constant The fine-tuning argument, which Lennox uses, suggests that the precise conditions of the universe imply a designer. However, this argument assumes that life as we know it is the only possible outcome, and that the universe was fine-tuned specifically for life. From an atheistic standpoint, it's equally plausible that multiple universes could exist (as suggested by the multiverse hypothesis), and we happen to live in one where conditions allow life. Additionally, our understanding of the universe is still incomplete, and what seems "fine-tuned" could be explained by future scientific discoveries. 5. The Reliability of Cognitive Faculties Lennox challenges the atheistic view by questioning the reliability of cognitive faculties that evolved through naturalistic processes aimed at survival rather than truth. However, evolutionary processes can lead to reliable cognitive faculties because true beliefs often contribute to survival. For example, correctly identifying predators or understanding cause-and-effect relationships in the environment enhances survival chances. The fact that our cognitive faculties are not perfect doesn't imply they are wholly unreliable; rather, it suggests that they are good enough for practical purposes, including scientific inquiry. 6. Atheism and Cognitive Biases Lennox argues that if survival, not truth, drives evolution, then atheism itself could be a false belief shaped by evolutionary processes. This line of reasoning assumes that if a belief is useful, it must be false, which is a false dichotomy. A belief can be both useful and true. Furthermore, scientific methods are specifically designed to counteract cognitive biases and test beliefs against objective reality, making them a reliable means of acquiring knowledge. 7. Faith and Morality Lennox claims that faith in God provides a moral and philosophical framework. While it's true that religious beliefs can shape morality, this doesn't mean that morality requires a belief in God. Secular ethical systems, like humanism, provide robust moral frameworks based on reason, empathy, and the well-being of conscious creatures. These systems do not rely on supernatural beliefs and are grounded in the real-world consequences of actions. 8. Einstein’s Beliefs and Misinterpretation Lennox references Einstein’s sense of awe at the universe's order as evidence of a "superior intelligence." However, Einstein was clear that he did not believe in a personal God. His references to a "superior intelligence" or "God" were often metaphorical, expressing his reverence for the mysteries of the universe rather than endorsing theism. It's important not to conflate a sense of wonder with belief in a deity. 9. Encouragement to Reflect Lennox encourages deep reflection on his arguments, which is a valid and important process. From an atheistic perspective, reflection is indeed crucial, but it should involve critically examining all claims, including those about the existence of God. The burden of proof lies with those making the claim, and if the evidence for a supernatural creator is not convincing, it's reasonable to withhold belief. Conclusion Lennox presents a thoughtful case for the compatibility of science and faith, but from an atheistic viewpoint, the arguments for the necessity of a God or the compatibility of faith and science do not hold up under scrutiny. Science operates independently of religious belief, relying on empirical evidence and testable theories, while faith involves accepting claims that often lack empirical support. The search for truth, therefore, should be grounded in evidence and reason, rather than in faith-based assertions.
Next video you make please do not use White for your text, from 2-3 feet away from the screen it is very difficult to read. Please only use black. Love your videos but will not be able to watch them all if all of your text is in white, outlined in black.
