Тёмный
USLawEssentials
USLawEssentials
USLawEssentials
Подписаться
These are video responses to questions I receive from international students, attorneys, and other professionals regarding law in the United States. My goal is to help people from countries other than the United States to understand the essential aspects of US law. Please feel free to get in touch with your own questions and comments.
Edwards v Vannoy
16:40
2 года назад
What is the series qualifier canon?
4:00
3 года назад
What is 42 USC Section 1985?
2:32
3 года назад
What is restitution?
2:31
3 года назад
What is supplemental jurisdiction
3:50
3 года назад
What is a motion for reconsideration?
2:33
3 года назад
What is a lesser included offense?
3:34
3 года назад
What is Qualified Immunity?
3:10
4 года назад
What is proximate cause?
5:06
4 года назад
What is the crime of attempt?
2:40
4 года назад
Комментарии
@j.murray8957
@j.murray8957 3 дня назад
so sue the police department not the officer...
@RachelLovelace
@RachelLovelace 6 дней назад
Crystal clear! Thank you!
@ericklymn5416
@ericklymn5416 8 дней назад
Yea. Tell that title IVD/child. They violate the 4th, 5th, and 14th amendment
@mahmmadAbraahim-o5w
@mahmmadAbraahim-o5w 8 дней назад
Mahamadabrhim
@butchjones1486
@butchjones1486 9 дней назад
Good info. Makes it a little clearer.
@user-st8jk4cn6u
@user-st8jk4cn6u 11 дней назад
Qualified immunity is a foolish idea that courts dreamed up so that cops aren't held to accountability when they make a mistake or break the law even on purpose. When that happens the public (you and me) are the ones who have to pay for those mistakes because fines and judgements are paid for with our tax dollars from city, county and state taxes. The cops who break the law don't have to pay because of qualified immunity. QI must be stopped. The bill to stop it has been tabled in congress by corrupt politicians. Write your congressmen/women.
@yelo7242
@yelo7242 14 дней назад
Subtitles show the word "quark witnesses". In fact, this is "court witnesses". This is for non-native speakers.
@hyojinlee
@hyojinlee 15 дней назад
Thank you for this video!
@Tns85
@Tns85 16 дней назад
Why? Would you need the case for controversy clause and when
@USLawEssentials
@USLawEssentials 15 дней назад
Good question. There are at least two reasons. First, the idea is to make sure the judicial branch (federal court system) doesn't intrude on the powers of other branches of government - the legislative and executive branches. The courts can only hear certain types of cases and can't issue advisory opinions. Second, the requirement that the court can only hear actual cases and controversies helps prevent the courts from being overburdened. If anyone could bring a case without having suffered actual harm, we would encourage frivolous litigation where no one actually suffered an injury.
@Tns85
@Tns85 15 дней назад
Thank you for explaining that to me! I am a first year paralegal student and sometimes youtube Can be a great reference thank you!
@terencewinters2154
@terencewinters2154 16 дней назад
Correct .
@nyamuochpaul4279
@nyamuochpaul4279 19 дней назад
Thank you
@sheetalgowrea9108
@sheetalgowrea9108 24 дня назад
Do yu have the video on specific and minimum contacts please?
@haafizxhmr
@haafizxhmr 26 дней назад
is it the same with striking out?
@Ketoklubz
@Ketoklubz Месяц назад
Are civil wrongful termination cases worse in federal court ? What if a defendant from the same state is hiding and we can’t find her to serve ?
@annag3862
@annag3862 Месяц назад
I would just add that it shall be made on the same grounds. A lot of students, like me, fall for this trick, when JMOL is brought on different grounds
@MurdaQ50
@MurdaQ50 Месяц назад
so i had tickets, i had zoom calls coming up, then that same day got scheduled as an expert, what does that mean
@JesUSking17
@JesUSking17 Месяц назад
Well done gentlemen. *nod*
@luciokeyboards
@luciokeyboards Месяц назад
Here after dr. Disrespects tweet
@dominicc8332
@dominicc8332 Месяц назад
Yes yes, it all makes sense now. Bravo! Great work!
@NelmarSen
@NelmarSen Месяц назад
0:50 wouldnt that be called a fee simple defeasable? glenda gave it to alexa under 1 condition
@askmshaymes
@askmshaymes Месяц назад
Are you still responding to these chats via email?
@albertotorres321
@albertotorres321 Месяц назад
Muy bien muy útil que tengan un muy buen día
@lamar5803
@lamar5803 Месяц назад
Great Education!
@filho4437
@filho4437 2 месяца назад
Grand Jury's are more of a shield for the prosecutor than a defendant.
@truthfreedom8506
@truthfreedom8506 2 месяца назад
What is the official commentary of the N.Y.U.C.C. called?
@USLawEssentials
@USLawEssentials 2 месяца назад
There are official comments to the UCC but I'm not aware of official state-specific comments.
@ez3333
@ez3333 2 месяца назад
😇👍
@ez3333
@ez3333 2 месяца назад
😇😂
@RajaMuzamal-ig5xe
@RajaMuzamal-ig5xe 2 месяца назад
Sexy dikhana full sex dikhana sexy dikhana full
@lakeishamcfall4833
@lakeishamcfall4833 2 месяца назад
Great stuff and I have t taken civ pro yet!
@tracyhazelton1878
@tracyhazelton1878 2 месяца назад
What can I do if the judge in circuit court has denied me due process? He is allowing the prosecutor to use recycled documents and holding me to a deferred prosecution agreement that I did not have any knowledge of or given a copy of until after the defense attorney had withdrawn from the case. I have tried to withdraw my plea and the judge refused the motion.
@marvinbrando722
@marvinbrando722 2 месяца назад
It is basically a santa inquisition
@RowlandKolajo
@RowlandKolajo 2 месяца назад
thank you very much. 👌👍
@matthaytham1886
@matthaytham1886 2 месяца назад
I FINALLY UNDERSTOOD WHAT INTERPLEADER IS! HOLY COW! Why is it needs to be English before being understood? Why wouldn't I get it with Filipino words? Thanks for the good animation
@YvetteWilliams-xm6vs
@YvetteWilliams-xm6vs 2 месяца назад
😢😂🎉❤
@omegaservices5909
@omegaservices5909 2 месяца назад
Helpful
@Turalcar
@Turalcar 2 месяца назад
If David didn't see her enter the bank this can probably be objected to as speculation. If that's because Debbie told David she was going to the bank, this is hearsay but allowed under the "statement against interest" exception.
@USLawEssentials
@USLawEssentials 2 месяца назад
Remember, for an opposing party statement you don't need the declaration against interest hook. .
@Turalcar
@Turalcar 2 месяца назад
@@USLawEssentials I suppose they don't need the declaration because if one side brings it up it's almost by definition against the opposing party's interest.
@USLawEssentials
@USLawEssentials 2 месяца назад
@@Turalcar It's a little different. When you're dealing with a party you don't need the statement against interest. Please look at FRE 801(d)(2)
@Turalcar
@Turalcar 2 месяца назад
@@USLawEssentials Weird. So it's not even an exception. Just not hearsay
@USLawEssentials
@USLawEssentials 2 месяца назад
@@Turalcar Right.I think the hearsay rules get a little odd (IMHO) but the distinctions are important if you're taking a law school exam or a bar exam.
@jeffking8890
@jeffking8890 3 месяца назад
The Supreme Court decisions in the 1920s cases of Fairchild v. Hughes and Frothingham v. Mellon were wrong as there is no concept to limit bring a case to just 3 requirements or even the term of “standing”. The Government can act without a Constitutional basis which the remedy will not be able to redress the grievance or grievances. Even the act of passing a law in Congress can create an injury to the States as the Legislature had no authority to pass a bill or act that was not already in its power. The Federal Government has passed too many laws, bills, and acts in contradiction to the powers that were reserved for the States.
@kiranshah8011
@kiranshah8011 3 месяца назад
3 sister one brother one brother is expire after marrage his wife and two sons after expire his wife doing new marrage his mother inlow is only in his house three sister married now his mother is agree his properties is given three daughter hosekta hai please answer
@monkeybudge
@monkeybudge 3 месяца назад
A lot of Trump fans need to understand standing
@coolmom5572
@coolmom5572 3 месяца назад
thanks for explaining clearly what to expect at a Discovery for average people.
@jasminehendricks8304
@jasminehendricks8304 3 месяца назад
“Performance is the acceptance of the contract” couldn’t explained it any better!!
@yes-fy5gx
@yes-fy5gx 3 месяца назад
Shared or concurrent??
@johnwerner69
@johnwerner69 3 месяца назад
I'm here after i heard Kendrick say "and your homeboy need subpoena"
@prayenergy7376
@prayenergy7376 3 месяца назад
Lets say a Judge didn't get a mandatory certificate to deal with cases that had to do with "tieing your shoe", (just a hypothetical).... And the deffendent objects to a lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Would the defendent be correct that the court doesn't have subject matter Jurisdiction because the Judge is not qualified by not having approved credentials?
@sevyn13
@sevyn13 3 месяца назад
Abolish it!
@eringrine9810
@eringrine9810 3 месяца назад
Awesome. Simple and straight to the point!
@maxkravchenko9837
@maxkravchenko9837 3 месяца назад
So good explained. Thanks.
@NarenDesai-dl9mr
@NarenDesai-dl9mr 3 месяца назад
How to email?
@CarlaReynolds-or3bp
@CarlaReynolds-or3bp 3 месяца назад
It has been 65 days. He has not answered the questions that was sent to him. How do I write it asking the judge to put sanctions on him for not responding?
@CarlaReynolds-or3bp
@CarlaReynolds-or3bp 3 месяца назад
How do you file a motion to compel answers to indirect Tory? Can you send me a sample on how I should write it in word if I would appreciate it. Thank you