Maggie Thompson MS, LCMFT, DBT-C, CIMHP is a licensed clinical Psychotherapist with a Bachelors Degree in Psychology and Masters in Psychotherapy. She studied Theology as an undergrad, & has been in practice for 20+ yrs, with numerous behavioral health certifications. This page is intended to look under the veil of societal indoctrination and misuse of psychology. Under the veil is to seek solutions through the use of accurate story-telling, factual data, and historical references to; provide accountability, and information for reference, & one day help prevent further abuse at the hands of an elitist society bent on division. Any info given regarding others is purely for context If you believe that erroneous or unclear information has been portrayed by this creator, let us discuss with further data, and/or clarification. Patreon: patreon.com/MaggieThompson
@maggiethompsonundertheveil1041 No worries. Have you seen the Simpsons Universe zoom out? Look it up here if you haven't, but it fits in perfectly with this video. Kinda blew my mind to see it visualized.
I really don't believe in using the word "toxic," but I'm probably guilty of considering others as being low vibrational." In my defense though, I've always considered something that could be changed and not a permanent state of being... if that makes a difference 😅
It can be a difficult task not to judge others who you consider “low vibrational.” When you’ve worked so hard to raise yourself up, do the inner work, heal your past trauma, etc, and then here they come…😂
@drthasanjohnson looks like only one study used vibrational metrics. The conflation of frequency with frequency, and the conflation of pleasant and positive with high vibrational lol. That said, this study used gamma waves and looks interesting. I’m going to check it out. www.cs.cmu.edu/~muli/file/emotion_embc09.pdf
Did you actually make any point? Why would a man commit to a long term relationship with a promiscuous woman? Now that you've disproven some talking points, what do you actually have to say about promiscuous women? Nothing? That's what I thought. Gotta protect the hoe-sisterhood. It's not impossible for a fomer hoe, to love/like a man. Is that it? It's not impossible to be a trillionaire. It's also not impossible for you to have 1 billion youtube subscribers. I suppose you will have all of that soon...It's not impossible. Right? PS: If "there was no research" that proved that if you jumped out of a 10 story building, you would break your legs, would you do so? Remember: "there is no research to prove it". Disingenuous at best.
The point, and I’m sorry it escaped you, was that some of the talking points used are incorrect, however, there ARE valid talking points that need to be included when diverting young ladies from “hoe” behavior. I did not ask, nor direct, nor mention men committing to a long-term relationship with a promiscuous woman. That’s all you. As stated above, and in the video, it is unhealthy behavior. Not sure what “how-sisterhood” I’m protecting by saying that. There is plenty of research about the damaging effects on a human body from varying heights. I tend to rely on facts and research to make rational decisions, not just how I feel about something. If you feel that marrying a virgin means she won’t divorce you, then do that. By the way, I made a correction video because there IS research. Lastly, and I can’t state this strongly enough: I’m rubber, you’re glue. Whatever you say bounces off me and sticks to you.
@@janushomer9111 Or, and hear me out, I believe what the research says (as I repeated, “tend to”) but it can be a bit complicated to the point of silliness to talk about female orgasm. I knew if I didn’t double down on the “tend to,” it would be a point of contention. Women tend to not understand their own orgasm, and men are men so don’t understand female orgasm. Also, nervous laughter when talking about socially stigmatized things happens 🤷♀️
What is interesting here is that the mother can remain close to her daughter no matter what happens (female in-group preference?) but unless she is satisfied with the relationship with the father, the boy will suffer. The never cared about the boys. There is so many logical inconsistencies in the supposed logical reasoning that they base themselves on to draw conclusions. Despite their personal issues, many fathers still do the best they can so as for their children not to be negatively affected. Somehow, it means that mothers happiness is what makes children thrive.
Upper class wealth. He father is a multi-millionaire. She comes accross as a scociopath. She acts edgy for the sake of views and gaining clout, to become a candace owens. (See her managing agency) The funny thing is that a lot of people give her money in the form of donations/superchats, etc. (including black people). And a lot of black people work for her and allow themselves to get exploited by her. She was trying so hard to get herself on the map by calling Kevin Samuels' show even though she has nothing of value to say on his topics. A lot of men -both black and white- won't cut her off when she goes too far. So, when you look at it pragmatically, she has no reasons to mean her "apology". Also, a big subset of the manosphere is racist and white supremacist. Is that an elephant in the room? Those are her main clients (donations).
“Carloads of oranges dumped on the ground. The people came for miles to take the fruit, but this could not be. How would they buy oranges at twenty cents a dozen if they could drive out and pick them up? And men with hoses squirt kerosene on the oranges, and they are angry at the crime, angry at the people who have come to take the fruit. A million people hungry, needing the fruit- and kerosene sprayed over the golden mountains… There is a crime here that goes beyond denunciation. There is a sorrow here that weeping cannot symbolize. There is a failure here that topples all our success. The fertile earth, the straight tree rows, the sturdy trunks, and the ripe fruit. And children dying of pellagra must die because a profit cannot be taken from an orange. And coroners must fill in the certificate- died of malnutrition- because the food must rot, must be forced to rot. The people come with nets to fish for potatoes in the river, and the guards hold them back; they come in rattling cars to get the dumped oranges, but the kerosene is sprayed. And they stand still and watch the potatoes float by, listen to the screaming pigs being killed in a ditch and covered with quick-lime, watch the mountains of oranges slop down to a putrefying ooze; and in the eyes of the people there is the failure; and in the eyes of the hungry there is a growing wrath. In the souls of the people the grapes of wrath are filling and growing heavy, growing heavy for the vintage.”
I just discovered your channel through this video. I watched it in its entirety and then again a second time for about half way through. I appreciate your video and your sharing of all your knowledge. I tried to find the answer to whether I am the problem or not as suggested in your video title, but couldn’t find for sure how to know. However, I think that I am. I think I am fundamentally flawed, and may be broken beyond repair. In my quest to figure out why my relationship is so lonely, over the past few months I discovered attachment types for the first time. I’m not sure when this information came about in psychology (I minored in psychology back in 2013). I recognize that I am a woman with fearful avoidant attachment style. My spouse has avoidant attachment style. When I try to communicate with him regarding my needs he ignores me/is dismissive, but the more I reflect on myself I think it’s that neither of us have good communication skills. And maybe mine are worse and that’s why he is unwilling/unable to communicate with me of give me what I need in the relationship? We have been married almost 17 years and I have endured this loneliness and lack of connection nearly the entire time and I am now strongly considering divorce. Do you take new clients for therapy?
@@blackeneddove my hope was in discussing the styles, and where they come from, would help people to give themselves some grace. ❤️ No one is fundamentally flawed, we’ve just all been through tough stuff. Now, while our trauma and past is not our fault, it becomes our responsibility to address it. If you’re thinking of therapy, I always first recommend face-to-face over televideo. Insurance companies will help you sift through options, and find a good fit for treatment. I wish you all the best, and you’re also welcome to dig into the Shadow Work playlist, if that seems interesting.
I recently stumbled across a Attachment specialist by the man of Adam Lane Smith on RU-vid and found his take on attachment styles interesting, particularly his videos on Disorganized Attachment aka Fearful Attachment and Ethical Attachment. I’d love to hear your thoughts about it Maggie. 🙏🏾
