6:25, notice how Chomp, smoothly side stepped the question, "Does that bring you pleasure" This guy is like a Jesus under questioning by the Pharisee's
Political leaders are often held responsible for perpetuating racism, using it as a means to further their own political agendas. As they set the direction, both racists and non-racists may follow suit. In this way, political leaders resemble pastors whose congregations follow their teachings without independent research or self-education.
I'm part of the Windrush generation. In the 1950s, my aunt was employed as a nanny in Saint Vincent for an English family called the Cassans, whom I believe were representatives of the British government there. My mother initially worked as their cook in Saint Vincent before joining the Hadley family there in the same capacity. Upon the return of the Cassans to Windsor, England, they brought my aunt along to continue her duties with their children. Later, my mother moved to England, financed by her father. Eventually, my three uncles followed, then me in 1961, and then my three brothers followed me.
I know Elam and Rachel personally. I call them mom and Dad because I've known them since i was a kid. Rachel passed away a year ago. I miss her. Pray for Elam.
They drag out this idiot from the Clinton indoctrination hospital at the drop of a hat, convenient really as he talks through his hat. This kind of bias is why we need someone like Trump in Britain, the whole media needs to be purged.
🟪1. THE ATHEISTS' 95% PROBLEM. Scientists have conceded that they only know about 5% of what is going on in the Cosmos, and have described the rest (95%) as "undetectable by scientific instruments dark matter and dark energy." In other words, atheist-evolutionists (scientific pantheists) are, as it were, building an entire ideological empire (religious cult?) on the flimsy knowledge of the 5% that cosmologists are able to offer them at best. How intelligent is that? What kind of person puts his head, his life, his career and professional standing in academia on the line on such flimsy information? 2. THE ATHEISTS' 5% PROBLEM (HOW DO SCIENTISTS KNOW IT IS 5%?). Furthermore, how accurate is the assessment of 5% knowledge about the Cosmos anyway? To be able to calculate that 5%, scientists apparently must first have assumed that they know what 100% information about the Cosmos (in toto) entails, a practical impossibility; in other words, even the cosmologists' estimate of 5% comes as a highly suspect figure: 5% of how much? Maybe it is not even 0,5%, or 0,0000000005% at best on their best day. 3. THE THREE BASIC ATHEISMS. The atheists' other problem is the trilemma of the 'three atheisms' that they are putting on offer: 3.1 CLASS A: "God is dead!" (Are they saying He must have been alive in the remote past? How did He die?). 3.2 CLASS B: "God is evil!" (Are they saying that He actually exists but that He is evil? In that case, are atheists flirting with Satanism now? They are the only other bloc I know of who says that God exists but that He is evil). 3.3 CLASS C: "God does not exist!" (How they can know that predicated on 5% knowledge about the Cosmos is anyone's guess). 4. MAKE UP YOUR MIND GUYS. Common sense dictates that the viewpoints mentioned above are all three mutually exclusive, i.e., they cannot all three be correct/valid/right at the same time. As far as I am concerned, they are all three lying. As far as they are concerned, at least two of them are lying. So, which one do they say is right and which two do they say are wrong? Maybe the time has arrived for the atheist-evolutionists (scientific pantheists) to sort this issue out among themselves before they come to another debate with a creationist.
Nice copy and paste but if you had a brain you would be able to figure out almost everything you said is either things literally no atheist says or a rant about some scientists saying how they only know about 5% of everything, you make up imaginary problems that you solve and then you call yourself the winner
My father was alvin guy mentioned in the manifest machinist. My dad ended ip in manchester and worked all his life as a skilled engineer. He would have been 104 years old. But sad to say we still recieve prejudice today.
Russell is wrong. Pure cocaine? pure meth? pure heroin? perhaps develop synthetic lab made versions of these drug (which already exists for heroin called methadone). THis is insane. It's good that drugs are illegal, if you make them legal, the taboo will disappear. It will solve nothing. I am watching this video in 2024, and there are rumors our incompetent Prime MInister will legalize cocaine.....I pray it doesn't happen.
Perhaps Mr Lammy should remember that many black artists turned down the chance to perform at the first Band Aid concert when they were asked to appear by Bob Geldof
Like too many interviewers, this guy interrupts too much. I watched to hear Martin's answers, not this guy's lengthy, well-phrased, intelligent questions.
I'm here two years later. This woman has Barbados well respected around the world. 4.5 percent economic growth, crime low, unemployment low. Barbados about to host cricket T20 world cup. International business conferences being held in her country every month. Everyone is talking about Barbados. Place really shining like a Diamond in the Caribbean. I'm so angry at the prime minister of my twin island about now. All we can do is sell passports to be relevant. 😢
