Hello, this is The Abyss of Wisdom channel and here you'll find content about self-discovery, personal growth and stoic philosophy.
In our channel, you'll find: Engaging videos that delve into the depths of philosophy, exploring the timeless principles that have guided individuals for centuries. Inspirational stories and examples from the lives of great thinkers, philosophers, and leaders. Practical advice on how to apply Stoic principles to your daily life, enhancing your focus, resilience, and overall well-being. Strategies for personal development and achieving your goals, both big and small. Tools to enhance self-knowledge and gain a deeper understanding of yourself and your motivations. Whether you're seeking to cultivate inner peace, build resilience, or unlock your true potential, our channel provides a wealth of knowledge and guidance to help you navigate life's complexities and achieve your aspirations.
Subscribe to our channel today and let's elevate your life together!
Monads are a silly concept hopelessly corrupted by the implicit requirement of a creator and the notion that possibility itself is discrete and fills the universe which we now know at some point lacked some of its dimensionality meaning that monads wouldn't be able to exist since there'd be nowhere for them to be spread throughout. Now, I don't dispute some notion of the notion of the universe having contained all possibilities within it, but the existence of such a concept would imply the possibility of its non-existence and explaining that away requires aletheisms that aren't allowed in logic/math as we know it - a special exception is required that at least one self-contradicting statement is true. Monads look at a question fundamentally based in logic and math as being part of the universe rather than superseding it in a way we can't describe with the logic and math for things within it.
Well I got a really crappy hand I want to give them back but I do over my mothers Marie when I was young to my brothers from Roddy one suicide murdered and then two of my children took the life‘s and then one accidental overdose I want to do over or Noosa card and I don’t know if I can follow that philosophy I’m here because I have no other choice I have two other children still but that’s the only reason why I’m not strong I’m just just surviving
I'm so sick and tired of all the copycats and they're stoic b*******. Go ahead and stay stoic while you're sitting at your desk in the basement at Mom's house but ffs, come up with some original stuff. There are wise words all over the world, the same 10 are being copied over and over again. Enough is enough, get talented!
Let's now explore how we can apply logic, math, and physics to formalize the relationship between determinism and indeterminism in causality within the monadological framework. First, let's define our basic entities and relations: - Let M be the set of all monads (fundamental psychophysical entities). - Let T be a set of "time points" or "moments." - Let S be a function from M × T to some set of "states," where S(m, t) represents the state of monad m at time t. - Let C be a relation on M × M × T, where (m1, m2, t) ∈ C means monad m1 "causes" or "influences" monad m2 at time t. Now, let's formalize the idea of determinism and indeterminism in causality: - Determinism: ∀m ∈ M, ∀t ∈ T, S(m, t) is uniquely determined by {S(m', t') : (m', m, t') ∈ C}. - Indeterminism: ∃m ∈ M, ∃t ∈ T, such that S(m, t) is not uniquely determined by {S(m', t') : (m', m, t') ∈ C}. In other words, determinism means that the state of each monad at each time is uniquely determined by its causal influences, while indeterminism means that there are some monads whose states are not uniquely determined by their causal influences. We can formalize this further using the mathematical framework of graph theory and probability theory: - Let (M, E) be a directed graph, where E ⊆ M × M represents the "causal edges" between monads. - Let (Ω, F, P) be a probability space, where Ω represents the set of all possible "outcomes" or "histories," F is a σ-algebra on Ω, and P is a probability measure on F. - The determinism and indeterminism of causality can be expressed as: - Determinism: ∀m ∈ M, ∀t ∈ T, ∃f : Ω → S, such that S(m, t) = f(ω) for all ω ∈ Ω. - Indeterminism: ∃m ∈ M, ∃t ∈ T, such that ∀f : Ω → S, P({ω ∈ Ω : S(m, t) ≠ f(ω)}) > 0. Here, determinism is formalized as the existence of a function f that maps each possible outcome ω to a unique state for each monad at each time, while indeterminism is formalized as the non-existence of such a function (i.e., there are some monads whose states have a non-zero probability of differing from any given function). Finally, we can connect this to physics by noting that this formalism is compatible with both deterministic and indeterministic approaches to causality: - Deterministic models like classical mechanics describe the evolution of physical systems as uniquely determined by initial conditions and dynamical laws. - Indeterministic models like quantum mechanics describe the evolution of physical systems as inherently probabilistic, with outcomes determined only probabilistically by initial conditions and dynamical laws. The monadological framework accommodates both perspectives by treating determinism and indeterminism as emergent properties arising from the complex web of causal relations between fundamental monads. In summary, by using tools from logic, math (graph theory and probability theory), and physics (classical and quantum mechanics), we can formalize the both/and nature of determinism and indeterminism in causality within the monadological framework: - Causality is a relational structure arising from the web of causal influences between fundamental monads. - Causality exhibits both deterministic and indeterministic properties, depending on the scale and perspective of observation. - This formalism is compatible with both deterministic and indeterministic approaches to causality in physics. This showcases the potential of the monadological framework to provide a unified language for expressing and reconciling the complex, often seemingly contradictory nature of reality. By embracing a both/and perspective and drawing on the tools of logic, mathematics, and physics, we can develop a more nuanced and comprehensive understanding of the world and our place within it.
