Both the M3 and M4 are built almost the same. They have the exact same wheelbase, with one having two giant doors. I would expect them to perform similar.
@@AzaanPD so far it looks promising. If it has the same or similar mod support, it's gonna be an absolute banger of a game. I'm already enjoying the original AC alot, so i'm excited about AC Evo. Wbu?
@@puls4r52 I'm gonna be trying to build a PC this winter so I'm definitely gonna be playing the game. It looks really good so far and I can't wait to play it. I'll hold my breath on mods for a few months tho
The 296 is a monster but that 765 is doing an incredible job keeping up with the Ferrari and the 296 has an electric motor💯 The 765lt is definitely more impressive 💯🔥
There is no way a 296 GTB beats 765LT....here the comparison is in different conditions, different climate, different surfaces etc etc......Hence, this video cannot be taken as a valid source to compare these two cars
@@bugattichiron8784I still do think the 296 will win against the 765lt even on the same conditions bc of that electric motor. However, the 765lt is just impressive as it keeps up with the 296 with no electric motor to boost the power output. And I'd also have the 765lt
for eau rouge in the straight go right beside the wall almost touching it full throttle then go into the brake line with no throttle until the exit and go two thirds throttle.
The SF90's drivetrain consists of a 4.0L TT V8 with 3 electric motors and an 8 speed transmission, the 2 electric motors are in the front producing 217HP and 1 in the back sandwiched between the V8 and the 8 speed transmission, in total the SF90's peak power is 986HP, 217HP from the front e-motors and 769HP from the V8. 0-130MPH the SF90 is AWD, but speeds above 130MPH the SF90 shuts off the front e-motors and redirects the battery power to the rear e-motor sandwiched between the V8 and the 8 speed transmission, in total, the SF90 loses 17HP because the rear e-motor only produces 200HP. The reason why the 296 is faster at speeds above 100MPH is because all 830HP is concentrated into the rear wheels where the SF90's rear wheels only produces 769HP, the front e-motors doesn't have a gearbox, it adds drag at higher speeds, to solve that, Ferrari added a 3rd e-motor, but that doesn't turn on up until a certain speed which the SF90 kinda loses momentum, if Ferrari had fitted a larger, denser battery on the SF90, the SF90 should and can power all 3 motors, it can produce a peak of 1,150+HP.
As you can see on the speedometer, the SF90 slowed down at speeds above 230KPH and then it speeds right back up again around 250KPH, that's where the SF90 turned on its rear e-motor and shuts off the front ones.
@@puls4r52 Fake speedometers SF90 is over 1.2 seconds faster than 296 GTB from 0-250 km/h It's not even close SF90 absolutely destroys 296 GTB if both cars have good drivers
