Welcome to the Penguin Books UK channel. Here you’ll find the latest author videos, book recommendations and everything you might want to know about the stories behind our books.
Subscribe to make sure you never miss a video and don’t hesitate to leave a comment or get in touch on Twitter, Facebook or Instagram. We’d love to hear from you!
We know that you’re one of the many ‘learned intellectuals’ here who have attained their Diplomas in ‘Special Alternative Reality Knowledge.’ Having completed extensive ‘studies’ and ‘research’ at the prestigious University of Utube, you are now in the unique position of being able to enlighten the rest us with your ‘profound’ in-depth knowledge. I hear there are three Fu*K Wit fraud Lecturers in residence there. They are ‘Professors’ Bart Sibrel, Emeritus ‘Bill’ Kaysing and Massimo Mazzucco (Nincompoopery Department of Misinformation and Deceit) Sadly for you, if your diploma was actually printed out, it’d not be worth the paper used for it. I suppose it could be utilised as arse wipe, but it’d block up the sewer.
APOLLO 11 THE LOST TAPES THAT AREN'T LOST. Here is the information concerning the supposed 'lost tapes' of Apollo 11. www.nasa.gov/feature/not-unsolved-mysteries-the-lost-apollo11-tapes.
Could Elizabeth have had children though? She was paranoid that a potential suitor would want to steal her crown and rightfully so. So I would have to disagree with her on that one. I don’t think it was as simple as “she could’ve had kids if she wanted to”
*THE MOON LANDING DENIERS MINDSET* Denialism is more than just another manifestation of the humdrum intricacies of our deceptions and self-deceptions. In the psychology of human behavior, denialism is a person's choice to deny reality as a way to avoid a psychologically uncomfortable truth. Denialism is an essentially irrational action that withholds the validation of a historical experience or event when a person refuses to accept an empirically verifiable reality. 🔆
*APOLLO ASTRONAUTS WHO WALKED ON THE MOON* Neil Armstrong (1930-2012)-Apollo 11 Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin (1930-)-Apollo 11 Charles "Pete" Conrad (1930-1999)-Apollo 12 Alan Bean (1932-2018)-Apollo 12 Alan B. Shepard Jr. (1923-1998)-Apollo 14 Edgar D. Mitchell (1930-2016)-Apollo 14 David R. Scott (1932-)-Apollo 15 James B. Irwin (1930-1991)-Apollo 15 John W. Young (1930-2018)-Apollo 10 (orbital), Apollo 16 (landing) Charles M. Duke (1935-)-Apollo 16 Eugene Cernan (1934-2017)-Apollo 10 (orbital), Apollo 17 (landing) Harrison H. Schmitt (1935-)-Apollo 17 *APOLLO ASTRONAUTS WHO ORBITED THE MOON DURING THE LANDINGS* Frank Borman (1928-)-Apollo 8 William A. Anders (1933-)-Apollo 8 James A. Lovell Jr. (1928-)-Apollo 8, Apollo 13 Thomas Stafford (1930-)-Apollo 10 Michael Collins (1930-2021)-Apollo 11 Richard F. Gordon Jr. (1929-2017)-Apollo 12 Fred W. Haise Jr. (1933-)-Apollo 13 John L. Swigert Jr. (1931-1982)-Apollo 13 Stuart A. Roosa (1933-1994)-Apollo 14 Alfred M. Worden (1932-2020)-Apollo 15 Thomas K. Mattingly II (1936-)-Apollo 16 Ronald E. Evans (1933-1990)-Apollo 17
My girlfriend was seriously ill but she survived I said to her - you were dead but now you are alive again,I'm dead now it's my turn I'm dead - speaking from my tomb.
bro come ooooon every single word is a lie and you know it you cant reach the deep seas and you cant explore antartic but you can go to the moon? they are faking news and lifes and they can t fake document ? they are producing stuning science fiction films and they cant produce fake images ?? sssss
" you cant reach the deep seas" *The Trieste has entered the chat* "you cant explore antartic [sic]" *Admiral Byrd has entered the chat* "they are producing stuning science fiction films and they cant produce fake images ?? " You clearly haven't seen the quality of the science fiction films of the time. Impressive, yes, but not even close to realistic enough to fool scientists.
Yes, let’s trust the random person who struggle with basic grammar with uncovering some grand conspiracy that flies on the face of scientific consensus and overwhelming evidence. Sounds legit. 😅 Do better, learn.
Ever seen 1960s sci-fi? Before the Apollo ‘Blue Marble’ photo pictures of the Earth looked like the Universal Studios logo. And the Apollo photos were taken both near and far and everywhere inbetween, with all of the meteorological data (cloud cover) matching exactly. If you can find a way to get all of that onto 70mm film transparencies and developed and printed within a short time of those weather patterns then you are a greater genius than anyone who ever lived, including the greatest artist, scientist and VFX expert to date.
I always say they went thru a lot to fake the Moon landing if that was so...My Grandfather worked for Grumman on Long Island he helped build the L.E.M. They made a plate and but everyone's name on it that helped build the L.E.M..So my Grandfather's name is on the moon several times.. Me and my cousin's saw the module in the shop he worked at on Grumman family day and I got to go inside it ..
The level of self importance, egotistical narcissistic ants which we happened to be as far as Earth is concerned is mind boggling!!! Geoengeniring Earth ?! Who the hell do we think we are ?! This planet will be here for many millennia’s long after we’re gone. We could not harm this planet in any real way if we really tried, it would simply get rid of us that much sooner. What primitive creatures we truly are !!!
I just want to know. Something we did 55 yrs ago we can’t seem to do now with much better computers, way better technology,just look at the difference in tvs cars , scientists and AI. We can’t duplicate today. Oh that’s right all this top secret stuff we carelessly lost in a fire. Probably can’t remember where they left the rover and lower lunar module to prove it
It makes sense to me, because there is no good reason to go back. After six landings, 842 pounds of moon rocks, and 8,000 photos, there is nothing else needed from that lifeless rock. With the enormous expense and effort required to go to the moon, just going for nostalgia's sake is a lousy reason to go back.
@@tonysoprano7777 And again for someone who doesn't have very good comprehension skills apparently. *Because there is no good reason to go back. After six landings, 842 pounds of moon rocks, and 8,000 photos, there is nothing else needed from that lifeless rock. With the enormous expense and effort required to go to the moon, just going for nostalgia's sake is a lousy reason to go back*
@gives_bad_advice That's the definition of a... distinction without a difference. You're a bot, or the type of guy who is so literal that if a person asked you to break a leg you'd jump off a 2 story building. I'll bid you a good night and hope you get the sleep you need.
I discovered these re-recordings when I was completely incapacitated by illness during the ferocious heatwave of July 2022, when even watching anything was more than I could manage. Keeping still and listening was all I could do. They absolutely kept me sane while I recovered, and I've continued working my way through them with absolute delight ever since. Completely outstanding work by everyone involved. 👏🏅
This is how actors and actresses should be feeling about their characters. I just love that she cares.. So many actors and actresses ive seen lately have just been doing films without any actual care for lore, the story, their character, how the viewers react. When Alex talks about any character shes been, from anything, its just always a nice breath of fresh air
Research this woman... She's as biased as they come. Her husband is a spokesperson for Pharmacare in Canada who got the job at the beginning of Covi d. Her Father-in-law sits on the board for a non-profit whos mission is to get vaccines in the developing world and got $10 million grant from the Bill/Melinda Gates Foundation. I wouldn't believe anything she says or has printed. Her financial interests are huge don't you think !
Back then we landed a jeep on the moon for no apparent purpose; today we sent a small module on the moon and it couldn't stand upright (one leg broke). Back then we livestreamed the landing; today we couldn't send back even one clear picture. 😂
"Back then we livestreamed the landing" There was no livestreaming until the advent of digital media. They used analog transmissions via radio/microwaves.
“Back then we landed a jeep on the moon for no apparent purpose” Nonsense. Obviously the reason was to get two men farther away from the landing site for the purpose of exploring and collecting Lunar samples.
Plenty of Conservatives believe we landed on the moon. However, *most deniers* tend to be conservatives. Flatwits obviously deny the Apollo moon landings.
There's been a cheapening of fast food and restaurant food across the board for years. Last time I bought little Caesars I was done. It wasn't that it was bland, it tasted almost faked. I started making my own pizza. One processed food I won't give up though is American cheese slices. Only way to do burgers.
@@redditsucksyo It's interesting that you think so. I guess everyone's different. But, personally I'm sure there is no way I could decide to become gay tomorrow and magically lose all physical attraction to women.
I’ll attempt to keep my emotions not shown but talk of facts as I sea it. 1/ Briton is Broken 2/ Briton is financially unrepairable 3/ Britons have 💯 lost there identity 4/ Britons do Not know what is a lie or trough any longer after years & years of Government constant lying. 5/ Britains are confused & many needing metal help from abuse of constant lying & make believe by Governments. 6/Britons Main Medea realised a long time ago that because the British Governments lyes & disillusionment is so disconnected from reality that the Press found anything that could be interesting & were forced to jump on the Great British merry go round of printing dishonesty to keep interest. 7/ Britons Military Navy, Air force & Army Personnel are totally Broken by constant lies & broken promises & then with them told ! Briton dose not need you, the Government on the hole Ditched them & forgot them. 8/ ( I’m finding hard not to preach so I’ll stop)But regards what I said about our Military, the same has been done to Police, NHS & all Emergency Services Regards & good luck 🍀
PEOPLE WHO THINK (I DOUBT THEY CAN THINK) , THAT WE DID NOT GO TO THE MOON ARE MORONS WHO WANT ATTENTION . THEY ARE CRY BABIES WHO WANT PEOPLE TO FEEL SORRY FOR THEM. THERE ARE PLENTY OF HARD FACTS THAT ABSOLUTELY YES, WE DID SUCCESSFULLY GO TO THE MOON AND RETURNED . CASE DISMISSED!!!!😊😊😊😊😊😊😊
Your comment implies that we haven't been back because we're no longer able to do it now. The primary reason we haven't isn't so much capability but money. NASA's budget is currently about 0.5% of the federal budget. During the height of the Apollo program that figure was about 5%, with the vast majority being funnelled directly to Apollo. Throw enough money, national pride, curiosity and anti-Soviet sentiment at a problem and it will get taken care of in a hurry. It was the right time; a perfect storm, so to speak. The goals, among other things, were making sure a human being could survive space travel and then, hopefully, to send a few to the moon. Those were accomplished (and, to be fair, the fruits of that labour continued to serve us well into the future). The problem was that after these were accomplished people began to wonder why we needed to continue funding the same mission over and over again. An expensive mission. Adjusted for inflation, each Apollo landing (not mission, but landing) cost roughly $20B. To put that into perspective, that's more than NASA's entire budget this year alone. A human standing on a surface other than the Earth is a truly amazing feat for not only our country but our species as a whole. But, as amazing as it is, it's also extremely pricey and extremely dangerous. A lot of what we need to do in space can be accomplished at the ISS, and a lot of what we need to know about the moon can be accomplished with a probe. We need a more pragmatic purpose to justify the costs. Ale
Yes, I could fake a Moon landing a gazillion times easier than doing it- with a crayon and a piece of paper. But whom would it convince? The _depth_ of the fake must be considered. A fake that would convince scientists, engineers, technicians, and educated laypeople is a differentl matter.
As a child reading through comments, I am stunned by the ignorance of people who profess to know a subject but show zero knowledge and understanding of it. They are passionately and willingly ignorant. I don't want to grow up into a world where people are so irrational and make decisions that affect others, guided by false beliefs.
Great comment, kid! I really hope your generation will put an end to this growing hysteria of basing beliefs on disinformation, misinformation and hearsay. It's critical for the well-being of society and the progress of humanity that future generations like yours prioritize critical thinking annd evidence-based reasoning. We need a culture of skepticism, fact-checking, and intellectual integrity so we can combat the spread of falsehoods and ensure that decisions are made based on reliable information rather than hearsay or the echo chambers of social media.
Yup, that was totally written by a child. All children type and think in that type of pattern. I'm sorry, but that was a terrible attempt at manipulation.
@@SolarChronicle Oh you may put all your hope in that fake user account all you will, but gen-z and gen alpha will easily be able to see that the scam you protect is just that.
@@redditsucksyo <-- Oh look! It’s the silly Flatwit 🤡again, fantasizing that “one day” ,,dah troof” will be revealed. Gen-Z to the rescue folks. What sort of dumb sh!t have you got for us today? No stars in the photos? Van Allen Belts? But I thought those were fake? Because…Space is fake, right? 🤣
@@SolarChronicle "I don't want to grow up into a world where people are so irrational and make decisions that affect others, guided by false beliefs." Well, with 8.0 billion people, you're going to have all kinds.
*HOW COME NOT ONE PROFESSIONAL SPACE FLIGHT EXPERT AGREES WITH YOU ''MOON HOAXTARDS ?* Were all 400,000 scientists, engineers and technicians who were involved in the Apollo Moon Program bribed or threatened into silence ? How did that world-wide cover-up work exactly ? Did everyone who earned a degree in aerospace engineering, or became an astronaut get a visit from the Men In Black, warning them not to talk about the Apollo fakery ? And what happened to those who refuse to cooperate ? Were they murdered ? Were they zapped by that little flashy thingy the MIB used to stealthily reprogrammed their memories ? And how come NASA was so inept when producing all those photographs ? So clumsy in concealing the ‘fakery’ ? How come only people with no significant aerospace qualifications see all those alleged ‘anomalies’ in all those video recordings, film and photos ? While those who actually worked on the Apollo Moon Program have no doubt whatsoever about the reality of the SIX Moon Landings ? Is it really believable that unskilled amateurs can find real anomalies that the experts in the field have failed to notice ? And isn’t it rather arrogant for Moon Hoax theorists to imply that by watching a few RU-vid videos and looking at a few low-quality photos, they can outsmart an astronaut or an aerospace engineer with years of practical experience ? Talk about being self-delusional! Get real ! *Paolo Attivissimo author of MOON HOAX: DEBUNKED*
All this expertise… for what!?!? Just go back and ppl will relax haha since it’s easier to go than to fake then it should be no problem for all the hard working space educated folks! Since so many ppl worked it before right!?
@@rashadwest4788 Here we go. New publication ! *APOLLO FAKE MOON LANDING FOR DUMMIES* Chapter 5. When confronted by facts stating that the SIX Apollo Moon Landings actually happen, learn the gentle art of pulling ‘Alternative Facts’ out of your arse without giving yourself haemorrhoids. This can be accomplished with ample amounts of self-delusion and a well developed cognitive dissonance. That will at least result in impressing others who are also gullible and give you a nice warm feeling that you are the custodian of ‘special insider’ information and a clever knowledgeable person. (TIS)
@@rashadwest4788 It was impossible to fake it in the 1960’s…you do the maths. Also, your astonishing ignorance is the standard for reality. Try again? Do better, learn.
This is so disgusting! I had my suspicions already. I'm old, so I knew when food used to taste like and find it so disappointing to taste things I used to enjoy, and find they don't taste anything like the foods I remember.
I’m still trying to comprehend how clueless conspiracy enthusiasts are. I’ll make an attempt to discribe your cluelessness. You’re so clueless, that even if you stripped down naked and doused yourself with Clue Musk, and then govotted in a field of Clues on ‘heat’ in the middle of ‘mating season, you’d still be clueless. If you were a looking glass looking for clues, you’d be outa focus !🤣
Beacause we FIGURED out how to go to the moon. So hes saying once you know how to do something, it is easier actually do something then fake it....use your brain.
Depends on whom has to be fooled. I can fake going to the Moon with a crayon and a piece of paper. That might fool my granddaughter, but she can't talk yet, so it's hard to tell. But if you want to fool scientists, engineers, technicians, or even anyone with a solid high school level of science, it will be harder than actually going to the Moon, yes.
@@rashadwest4788 Your question implies that we haven't been back because we're no longer able to do it now. The primary reason we haven't isn't so much capability but money. NASA's budget is currently about 0.5% of the federal budget. During the height of the Apollo program that figure was about 5%, with the vast majority being funneled directly to Apollo. Throw enough money, national pride, curiosity and anti-Soviet sentiment at a problem and it will get taken care of in a hurry. It was the right time; a perfect storm, so to speak. The goals, among other things, were making sure a human being could survive space travel and then, hopefully, to send a few to the moon. Those were accomplished (and, to be fair, the fruits of that labour continued to serve us well into the future). The problem was that after these were accomplished people began to wonder why we needed to continue funding the same mission over and over again. An expensive mission. Adjusted for inflation, each Apollo landing (not mission, but landing) cost roughly $20B. To put that into perspective, that's more than NASA's entire budget this year alone. A human standing on a surface other than the Earth is a truly amazing feat for not only our country but our species as a whole. But, as amazing as it is, it's also extremely pricey and extremely dangerous. A lot of what we need to do in space can be accomplished at the ISS, and a lot of what we need to know about the moon can be accomplished with a probe. We need a more pragmatic purpose to justify the costs.
What a wanker. Why does he have to insist on seeing such a remarkable piece of engineering through a deadening artefact such as a smart phone. Not only anachronistic but patronising.
*WARNING ALERT !* Incoming idiotic ignorant comments by the adherents of the Flat Earth & Magical Dome Cult, and other nincompoops of the Lunatic Fringe. That’d include Apollo Moon Landing deniers.
@@rashadwest4788 You mean like this ? *A FUNNY THING HAPPENED* WHEN NASA SENT NINE APOLLO MISSIONS OUT TO THE MOON Six of those missions went down with a two man crew to the Lunar surface Those were Apollos 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17 Now how about that ! 😎 PS. It's called a Reality Check. Get used to the exposure.
Earlier last century, it was more common for respectable scholars to research the facts of conspiracies. But then the CIA put out a memo to push "conspiracy theorist" as a slur to dismiss anyone who questioned the official narrative of the JFK assassination. The memo specifically told CIA agents to work with their assets in media. Data shows that, following that memo, the use of "conspiracy theorist" rhetoric shot up in mainstream media. Interestingly, during the Cold War, the Soviet and US governments were both pushing conspiracy theories to muddy the water. It was all a big game of social control, perception management, and censorship. All that fear-mongering and manipulation created a reactionary culture of distrust. It ended up empowering the worst elements in society, underming our ability to discern truth, including seeing actual conspiracies as real.
