The temperature at 13,000 feet is about 32 degrees. It would have blown up on the ground. The dog sniffing exercise was done on a different jumbo. This plane had 400 people going to Honolulu. Why did it take 8 days to find the black box in 120 feet of water. Kalstroms is a piece of shit. Your going to believe Bill who lied about Monica but his DNA WAS on her dress. Then his wife Hillview is suspect in Hattiesburg relief that disappeared. I smell cover up. FBI's job is to protect the president. Wake up people.
I heard that there was a defective forward fuel pump in the center tank. It was usually covered with fuel, so the sparking would not ignite fuel vapours. However, during climb at an upward angle, the pump was probably exposed above the fuel and the spark (shorting) might have caused an explosion. I flew the 747-200 for 15 years and was an instructor, check pilot, and Chief Pilot on that aircraft. I crossed the Atlantic many times flying from JFK to Frankfurt, Paris, or Amsterdam, we always kept a minimum amount of fuel in the center tank even if all necessary fuel could be carried in the wing tanks. This is just a theory, but a likely one. On some of the airports that we operated from, the ground temperatures were far higher than those at JFK. I think that keeping a minimum amount of fuel in the center tank, that submerged the fuel pumps was a good idea.
Yea propaganda paid for by its media company every Media company opted to agree with the absurd proposal video from the cia. Those videos are typically rendered by the NTSB, the control of this case was terrible the FBI snuck into the holding facility, a fisherman had picked up the missile charge it was interrogated for 6 hours, lots of obfuscation of data, unanswered requests, ballistic nitrites found, and the CBS reporter who have a fabric sample, and the company forced her to give it back to the FBI and didn't want any involvement on that angle of TWA 800 crash, and fired her soon after, because they (CBS) wanted the media deal for the Olympics that year. All of the news companies that are owned by the giant media conglomerates all pushed the absurd story despite some 755 possible witnesses, some 200+ across the 270° view field witnessed exactly the same thing and were ignored. FBI interview with them and nothing ever became after. There is also a radar return that shows something separating from the plane or some explosive shooting away from the plane perpendicularly from its travel at the moment it explodes at the speed of Mach 4, and the only shrapnel type explosion that can reach those speeds are incendiary. That is a fact there are highly regarded ex-military balliatics or explosives engineers that agree with that theory based on the radar data at the very instant that the "center tank" would have "exploded.". As well an unidentified high-performance aircraft that flew back and forth with no transponder south of the site, unidentified dark high-performance cigarette type boat witnessed and on radar, and then there were some 70 or so ships that were later identified as navy vessels that was south of the explosion of water impact, that continued on their course and speed without changing direction or anything indicating a rescue search effort until much later after the Coast guard with FBI agents that had a list of three things that they're looking for, one of which was a stinger missile first stage.
If it was the center fuel tank, would not the NTSB ground every 747 and re-fit or completely remove the center fuel tank? And why did they not ground every 747 after this horrific crash/ explosion!??????? All fuels have vapors! I thought that aviation fuel, which is basically kerosene cannot explode like this as it would burn, not explode. I am sure that jet engines are much hottercthen 127 degrees and that there must be vapors when ignition happens!?!? This does not quite "add-up".
I sent an email to the FBI back then, though as a non-American I didn't know what else to do or whom to contact with information. I was a passenger on the previous flight to Athens, seat 14A (or 12A - my memory still puzzles me on that). My seat was the only one that had a leak from the overhead A/C system while we were waiting 2 hours for takeoff. A greenish liquid that messed up my shirt and the flight attendant said they could replace my shirt, though I never asked. The leak stopped when we took off. When I heard about the accident I also heard that the airplane split in around the area of my seat.
The FBI are amateurs when it comes to accident investigation. The NTSB are the seasoned professionals. Kallstrom had no right to take command until it was proven there was a crime. This empire builder was a legend in his own mind
I was 18 when this occurred, hearing the news back home in Australia, it reminded me of the Pan Am terrorist attack that blew up by a bomb in Lockerbie Scotland. regarding the TAA flight many eyewitnesses witnessed a light flying toward the plane then the explosion. May they R.I.P
you won't deal in 'conspiracies' eh? What a stupid stupid word 'conspiracy' is, mate. It's not a conspiracy to take on the various high grade testimonies of eye witnesses that SAW a rising exhaust plume coming UP from the water. Or the radar plots showing all US Navy ships immediately scurrying back into a Defense Restrcted area of the Sound. Or the analysis of red coloured residues found present across transverse seat rows where the planes fuselage split apart - "residues that oozed out of packages" give me a fucking break. Nobody would handle explosives in test packages if they were in any way "oozing"... Finally, I have a set of photos sent to me from a 747 pilot, taken inside the reconstruction warehouse, showing the assembled parts around the centre fuel tank. The panels making up the centre fuel tank are NOT bowed out, as they would have been had there been a catastrophic over-pressure event. This refusal to reach any other conclusion than a fuel vapour explosion in the centre tank is a direct result of Department of Defense covering up for a missile testing on the Sound that night.....
You have not published my post. I was actually one of the confirmed passengers on TWA 800 FIRST class seat 3A. Only extraordinary sequenceof events kept me from boarding I am still alive 27 years later
The accident airplane, registration N93119 (a Boeing 747-131), was manufactured by Boeing in July 1971. It had been ordered by Eastern Air Lines, but after Eastern canceled its orders for Boeing 747s, the plane was purchased new by Trans World Airlines. The aircraft had completed 16,869 flights with 93,303 hours of operation and was powered by four Pratt & Whitney JT9D-7AH turbofan engines.On the day of the accident, the airplane departed from Ellinikon International Airport in Athens, Greece as TWA Flight 881 and arrived at John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK) at about 4:38 p.m.The aircraft was refueled and the crew was changed. The crew was led by 58-year-old captain Ralph G. Kevorkian, who had flown for TWA for 31 years and the U.S. Air Force for nine years and had logged 18,700 flight hours, including 5,400 on the Boeing 747. Captain/check airman Steven E. Snyder, 57, had flown for TWA for 32 years and had logged 17,200 flight hours, including 4,700 on the Boeing 747. Flight engineer/check airman Richard G. Campbell Jr., 63, had flown for TWA for 30 years and the U.S. Air Force for 12 years and had logged 18,500 flight hours, including 3,800 on on the Boeing 747. Also with the crew was 25-year-old flight-engineer trainee Oliver Krick, who previously served as a business pilot for four years and had 2,500 flight hours, including 30 on the Boeing 747. Krick had flown for TWA for 26 days and was starting the sixth leg of his initial operating experience training.Flight 800 was actually a training flight for Kevorkian, and he was seated in the captain's (left) seat. Captain/Check Airman Snyder was seated in the first officer's (right) seat monitoring Kevorkian's progress. Flight Engineer/Check Airman Campbell was seated in the cockpit jump seat. Flight engineer trainee Krick was seated in the flight engineer's seat being monitored by Flight Engineer/Check Airman Campbell. There was a 42 year old off duty poilet(he had 20 Years of Flying experience 12 Years for TWA) and one TWA airlines Technician and Aircraft Maintenance and Opretions Expert on board the flight
Just seeing the animation of the aircraft and knowing that a lot of those passengers survived the initial explosion. I can't even imagine the terror they felt.......😢
Did anybody ask if the missile theory was pushed by Boeing, airbus, or airlines so they could make passengers think there planes don’t just blow up and the financial cost if something was mandated?
The origins of the ABC's wokeness started long before President Trump I see. The ABC doesn't make one mention of Iran attacking the USS Stark, with a learjet, secretly carrying an Exocet missile, squawking mode 3 (civilian IFF code designator). You can't blame Captain Rogers for not trusting the Iranians in this case. The Iranians have an established history of premeditated deceitful behaviour.
hmm, I don't think the Yanks felt that bad for targeting a civilian target. They have been doing so in WWII, Vietnam, Syria, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, ... in large numbers and they were pretty proud of it.
Just so everybody knows, TWA 800 was accidentally shot down by a navy destroyer performing exercises off the cost. The FBI covered it up. Don’t believe me? Listen to what the NTSB investigators had to say about the “investigation”. Still don’t believe me? Listen to the 10’s upon 10’s of eye witness who witnessed “puffs of smoke” ascending from the sea into the air right before the explosion. Listen to how the witnesses were intimidated by the FBI into supporting their narrative. The more you look into TWA 800 the more disturbing it becomes.
The depiction of events in this video are inconsistent with two separate sources of radar that independently tracked the flight path of TWA800. The ISP Primaries and HPN Primaries radar captured nearly identical flight paths. Neither of which include an uncontrolled pitch up and acceleration of the aircraft. That is pure fiction, and verifiably incorrect and misleading. This theory put forward by the FBI and NTSB was laughed out of town by the aviation community and only gained traction when the NTSB released it's cartoon attempting to explain this maneuver. If an aircraft pitches up upon a catastrophic depressurization and 100% gain in drag coefficient by the inverse loss of aerodynamic performance the NTSB wouldn't have to use a cartoon to recreate the event. Radar recordings are points of fact, not generated by a government organization. The same government organizations that broke protocol at every turn to commandeer this "investigation". So, my instinct is to put my faith in the actual radar findings - which corroborates the climb narrative as a manufactured product of the NTSB and FBI that do not match the recorded radar movement of the B747-100. The aircraft exploded prior to the main/center fuel tank being breached as has been proven by the traces of nitrates found on the OUTSIDE of that fuel tank that when pieced back together show the splatter of these nitrates all fitting perfectly together like a jigsaw puzzle. This exterior explosion is the only possible way that fuel tank could be exposed to a spark of any kind, as there was no wiring or wiring harnesses installed in the B747-100 that carried the voltage necessary to generate anywhere near the energy that would produce a spark. The only battery on the aircraft that had the voltage to produce such wattage for that kind of energy transference is the outboard engine starting battery that is nowhere near the center fuel tank nor are any components of the wirinG This explosion was precipitated by either one or two land to air missiles fired from the US Navy destroyers conducting test runs/drills of air invasions. The country was in a heightened state of security as a result of the 1996 Centennial Olympic Games in Atlanta which were set to be opened by the President were just two days after this. The Navy fired live ammunition when their intention was to just drill the procedure. The testimony of over 800 eye witnesses - all of which were incidentally had their affidavits conveniently omitted from the final investigation report - yes not even one of 800 were included. This was because the level of sophistication among some of the witnesses and the wholesale consistency reported by all 800 witnesses describing the exact same thing from every conceivable vantage point, including from a helicopter, sea vessels and casual Long Island observers ALL depict a sequence of events that in no way bears any resemblance to the official findings/report/cartoon submitted to the American public and World at large. Another fascinating omission from the official findings can be read here: observer.com/1999/07/radar-shows-getaway-boat-fleeing-flight-800-crash/ This was a scandal of the highest order and frankly Clinton knew he wouldn't get reelected had the truth come out of this massacre on innocent civilians in what happened to be the summer of an election year. So the fail safe we have watched the Clintons do before and since this tragedy... they lied. and the lie was force fed to the public while those who know the truth from their 800 individual sets of eyes were marginalized, labeled conspirators and silenced. All to preserve a reelection bid such that he could go on to bang interns in the oval office. I love the Flight Channel and greatly respect your incredible attention to detail and vast knowledge on all things aviation, and if you go by the report put out by government agency one cannot be upset at this telling of the event. I am here to tell you, this is a swing and a miss. For anyone interested in the truth of TWA flight 800 there is eye witness information and documentaries available online, though many have been censored especially on YT, which in and of itself is an endorsement of truth.
Plane was mistakenly shot down by US navy. Over 700 people saw the missile. Tons of whistleblowers have come forward and nothing from the investigation made any sense. It was shot down. If you believe what the CIA said then you’re an idiot. Sad anyone believes this shit. The two guys being interviewed were directly involved in the cover up.
Not the US navy. Docs in archives / Public record / show US navy was not operating of LI that night at 8:30. This rumor is getting old, when a stack of evidence shows it was not the US navy. But the producers of such vids, already invested, (and too quickly) so they would find it hard to 'back peddle', with egg on their face. I provided them with the docs, but they remain silent. That is worse than the original cover up~!
@@robshef718Are we sure of this? I’ve listened to the eye witnesses and how they were intimidated by the FBI into being quiet. Additionally, the NTSB investigators nearly ALL felt manipulated by the FBI and routinely denied access to key pieces of the wreckage. This is coming from the NTSB investigators on the ground who were supposed to be in charge of this investigation.
@@tuckeraweston To '"forge" documents and have them in the United States Archives, [hummm?] As well as assuming that the family members, and then the people who worked on the base, [other military people and civilians] and then 'the civilian workers' who handle the ships, and then the office workers on base that provide the support.... and then all of the witnesses on the beach, and in the air, in commercial jets, and in private planes and on boats, who never saw the US navy out there, were what, told to lie? And the FAA radar people who reported a rouge target on radar seconds before the loss of the plane, they "made up" a missile? as being on radar? but, were they not suppose to say...'there was no missile'? So everyone was 'not' interested in the truth, per your theory, as "after all, EVERYONE is going to cover it all up?" Not a chance. There is too much evidence that it WAS NOT the U.S. navy, than to try and find ways to get people to forget about it?
Again, why was this particular plane taken down or shot down? I've never got an answer to my question. Was it calculated (knowing there were children on board) or was it a "mistake"?
EMILY CLARKE: It was a "Foreign weapons Test" {per NSA - per court docs} (Not the US Navy) that involved a SS 'AV' that impacted the left side of the plane due to some terrible miscalculations. The NTSB tried to cover it up. But *we won in court, against them*, though the main street media is not going to roll over and aire the truth. Thats because of $$$$$ corruption.
