The stages involved in resolving problems related to CVE-2023-34362 include: 1. Detection: Identify the presence of the vulnerability in the system, in this case, the remote code execution vulnerability in MOVEit Transfer. 2. Patching: Apply the necessary security updates provided by the vendor, in this case, Progress, to address the vulnerability and prevent exploitation. 3. Mitigation: Implement additional security measures or configurations to reduce the risk of exploitation while waiting for the patch to be applied. 4. Monitoring: Continuously monitor the system for any signs of exploitation or unusual activities to ensure the vulnerability is effectively addressed. 5. Communication: Inform relevant stakeholders within the organization about the vulnerability, its impact, and the actions being taken to mitigate the risk. By following these stages, organizations can effectively resolve problems related to CVE-2023-34362 and enhance the security of their systems.
The stages involved in decoding CVE-2023-34362 include verification, assignment of a CVE ID, description creation, vetting process, and potential modification. Problems with this process can be addressed by ensuring accurate verification, thorough description, proper vetting, and timely reanalysis for any modifications.
the info on CVE-2023-42793 is not showing on the community edition? And I can't see how to even look at what it would cost to subscribe and be able to use and contribute to ongoing attacks?
How was the initial shell established. The diagram showed step 1 as running ssh commands from the beginning. What was step zero that got me a shell in the first place?? That said, I'm unclear what the compromise is, because if I'm starting with shell to begin with, then it doesn't matter the language of the tool I use for persistence. Anyway, I was trying to follow along closely, but I didn't see the initial compromise to the linux router. What vendor of router are we even talking about? What CVE should we be concerned with. Lots of missing information, although I enjoy the direction you're heading in.
Hi，what is the version number of CALDERA demonstrated in your video? There seems to be some correlation between YAML execution and caldera version numbers.
I'm in need of an eml file reader/editor that isn't buggy right now. If anyone knows of one. Friend of mine has a stalker and I can't help them block the person's access as it was crafted eml files that when read get added to a compile pipeline on the devices in question. I need a native eml reader with a strong sandbox but one I can redact sensitive user's info in before sharing them, for their privacy. This is a pretty big problem and the hackers will likely see this, I currently can't even use my pc's (all busted by the hacks) for analysis, and discontinuing use of this account tomorrow because it may be compromised. But will be back to check on this comment.💤
