@blank faces have you seen Luke has just made a post saying "he hasnt made comment on the leaked sonar images and has now spoken to Peter Frauding and will be doing a video tomorrow" The fact that he says the leaked sonar images suggests they are the images Peter claims to have. They all a laughing stock. There is no body there
Can somebody please pass my message on to Luke's post please. Sadly he obviously didn't like my point of view and banned me ages ago. Unfortunately if you don't agree with their narrative they try to silence you "Images of Nicola. What a farce. You can see tree there. The legs are tree and there's branches at the top. There is no body there. All gullible to believe him. The fact these images are out in public is Peter's fault for sharing them with RU-vidrs and psychic mediums. What did he expect. He can never be trusted on a sensitive search again"
Oh looks like Luke's changes his mind now and is saying he won't comment till Peter does. They were all happy to make bold claims when the images were private. Now they out and people saying it's not Nicola to they're all hiding
Isnt it interesting how Crime Analyst, Luke, and all the Faulding friends who have apparently seen the images havent made a single comment on whether the images are legitimate and that they still believe its a body. Not one of them have made comment
It is very strange but it shows they are purposefully ignoring it now, maybe there is a legal issue now. Even truth finders have scurried away. I bet these riots were the reason they posted this now, hoping ht police are too busy to stop their nonsense.
@@blankfaces256 I think they realised they took him for his word and they were gullible muppets I'd love to see legal action against The Dork From Dorking, mouth of the south Peter Frauding for sharing images saying it's Nicola's body If they are his images then he is responsible for it being public. What did he think what going to happen sending a copy to numerous RU-vidrs and TV psychics. Every now and again I love to watch that mess Debbie Davies post 😂
I would hold off on attacks on the sonar images. I just watched a video uploaded by someone knowledgeable in such things and he showed how the images line up exactly with the shore and he now believes it may indeed show Nicola. If that’s true, it’s a very big deal. That would be glaring, irrefutable evidence of a coverup. It would absolutely need to come to light. It should be able to compel re-opening of the entire case!! I get the bit about sparing the family’s feelings - up to a point. It’s a nice sentiment. But does it line up with reality? I don’t think so. For one thing, several of the family had a strange way of showing how broken up they were over Nicola’s death. They seemed all too ready to collect in the death benefits, eh? Happy that the coroner didn’t ask hard questions and ignored important circumstances. Paul didn’t hesitate to unload Willlow the dog, did he? And eager to sell off the house it would seem. And didn’t he go and post himself up on social media to attract new admirers? This is one of those cases where the end may justify the means. Sure, you can argue propriety about releasing the images - but _if it IS Nicola_ how else can the truth come out?
You say you've watched a video from someone knowledgeable but you haven't stated their name or a link to the video? As for families behaviours have you worked on any missing person searches? Families are very rarely crying in interviews. They are in a state of shock and limbo and hoping for best outcome however unlikely it may be. I can completely understand struggling to live in a house full of memories being a constant reminder. I can fully understand wanting to move. Also perhaps now that he is a single father with possibly finances of Nicola to sort and of course unexpected funeral costs then perhaps selling the house helped with financial stability. I can also understand the family trusting the advice and findings of the Only knowledgeable experts eg Police, coroner etc who have decades of training, qualifications and experience in these matters over social media detectives who come home from work to sit on their computer and play Sherlock. There has been ALOT of misinformation and lies for clickbait over the last year and half. Do you have and factual evidence from reliable sources to support your assumptions?
Ive always found it hard to believe the sonar images were real, IF peter did send them to someone then it was only to wind them up. Is he still operating?
When you have Grooming gangs ruling the ghettos in Britain passing young girls about and Albanian machete wielding gangsters on the streets of Britain in broad daylight and 2 tier Policing and Politics... To subvert White English people then no one gives a fk about this story.
What she and others do turning missing people into entertainment and a circus and encourageing attacks against grieving people is actually worse then yhe sickos jokes
Where has it been said by a reliable credible source that he was scared or armed himself. It's crazy how paranoid tin foil hatters put out misinformation and people are dumb enough to believe it. And these "investigators" say they check their facts and use reliable sources. Laughable. Penny Bunny is another. On the Sunday she said "she had a reliable source that Jay was alive and her reliable source was going to prove it on the Monday". When she got called out she didn't accept accountability, she said she's "just reporting what was told" This person is not a criminologist. She says she did a course but I'm sceptical. Even if she did you learn from EXPERIENCE which she has NONE. She talks about "those are the facts" but she has NONE
They're all the same these content creators who jump on missing people. They need to CREATE drama for their clickbait views. They have no interest in factual information. They claim to be "raising awareness". Jumping on a high publicity case and sprouting misinformation is not raising awareness. It's profiteering from it. None of these content creators accept responsibility. And they aren't sorry. If they were then they wouldn't continue but I guarantee she'll be jumping on the next missing person exactly the same
Officially yes. But they would have known it was her as soon as they found the body. Decomposition is slow in water, especially cold water. After 3 weeks a body will still be visually identifiable and sometimes family can request to visually identify, but Police don't recommend it as it's not a sight family want to remember for life. This they have to wait for 100% identification such as dental records which are like finger prints. All dental work is unique. I know a dental technician who has done a number of dental identifications for bodies
Kells, please request from Lancashire constabulary their alledged verified image & data of the ' alledged' branch, to also send off to Marine Sonic for comparison x
@@AngelaGore-oy5du According to Peter. Where have Police written or verbally stated it was nothing? Peter said they told his team member on the bank. How do we know Police didn't tell that team member it's just a branch and the team member told Peter it was nothing as in not related. Or perhaps Police did say it was nothing meaning it's not related. No body, no clothing, it's nothing as looking for a missing person. I'm not sure why self proclaimed world renowned pioneer and expert Peter needs a drawing or sat down and told very simple every thing in basic terms. What does he want? Well Peter there was approximately 6 zillion grains of sand, I rocks, a branch with 12 twigs and 3 leafs still on it and there was possibly some creepy crawlies too. He says he questioned it and got told that it was a branch. But I suppose when someones ego makes guarantees and says he is never wrong then it's going to be difficult for his ego to dig himself out of hole he creates. And that still doesn't mean they have said they have images and data of a branch. They dived on it
@@AngelaGore-oy5du Here's a thought. The river is currently publicly accessible and no crime scene as Peter likes to state as a justification for him digging holes. Why doesn't Peter go up and scan the area again and see if the image is still there or not
''Because Jon doesn't seem to know the legislation. Taking a criminal on a bus who does this thing' 😂 (Made up story about a pedo selling wheels for special needs kids planning on mutilating a child) 'How did we get to here Jon? This story...' 'You're different. I have a special assignment for you.' 'SO the police because he was too deep into his investigation, put him deeper into the investigation". What really happened was probably that he was doing something illegal, that's why he lost his job. Strange meaningless details no one would say if they were recalling a story. When he went to the social workers it was a 'busy burrow', and 'it was a lot of alcoholics on that unit'. Just to paint a story in his head. 'It was sexy to do it'
As soon as he started talking about the canal boats he started lying. You can just hear it in his voice. the weird jokes and empasisis. His totally fake canal story, with weird graphic pedophile details.
It's always a red flag when a man confesses to crimes while implying for some reason you were left by the mother of your children, who left her children and that it's not his fault or that it's somehow something she caused.
Not him admitting to a proper psychpath childhood. I'm also a planner/architect with a messed up childhood, which I hate to have in common, probably not true on his behalf though. Promise I'm not like him 😂
Few people associate the name Madeleine McCann with Mark Williams Thomas. It is an unfortunate association but MWT does not have Madeleine's best interest at heart. He does however cover for her parents, with for knowledge of the events mostly certain implicating their direct involvement of a cover-up and not a stranger abduction. He is a disinformation agent and rotten to the core. And until he goes to Orgiva (where I lived and from where I was abducted by the alleged Madeleine abductor, Christian Brueckner's friend Steven William Farthing) who lived previously where I did, in Orgiva, Spain, to investigate and question the friends of Christian Bruckner where he lived before Madeleine was abducted then I shall carry on pursuing him lawfully in the comments section and where ever else he or his name and reputation exist. I was recently contacted through the Find Madeleine Fund email to inform me he was heading Operation Grange! OG have put the phone down on me twice, after long and productive discussions, until...(they are not allowed to accept non official accounts, ie the parent's guilt, but has cost £13 million! facebook.com/share/gxCuVTbS5xH8irNt/ ''Orgiva, [as you will recall] is the Spanish town in Andalusia, Granada, not far from the Portuguese border. Christian Brueckner lived on and off there over years. I exposed his friends online on Facebook, 'Orgiva Crime', and they nearly killed me. Multiple times. I explained to you [MWT] in great detail, but although you [he] asked the public for information, which I emailed you [him], and you [you ]have not even the decency to respond. I have every intention of finding justice for all victims involved, including myself. I would respectfully request that you, and Jon Clarke [owner, scumbag and editor in chief] from the English language, expat Olive Press News, team up and go and ask the difficult questions. The Mayor Raul Vilchez and Judge Penelope Diaz Fernandez operate a criminal syndicate and facilitated my abduction. Jon Clarke asked me to meet and talk to Christian Brueckner's friend, Steven William Farthing, who later abducted me. Madeleine's alleged abductor's friend, abducted ME! Is that not potentially significant? I told Clarke and all of you claiming interest and asking for information but seem to then NOT be interested. I still have Clarke's text messages. Kindly visit Beneficio, in Orgiva and please investigate with utmost urgency, and ask me for avenues to investigate. I shall continue to follow your progress where ever you go online, telling including some of the facts in this issue which will not reflect well on your own efforts. If you agree to seriously investigate the actions of the Junta authorities, and their predatory crime network I will be satisfied and stop. I am not harassing you but simply not willing to let you use me and other good and well intended folk to be left in such danger without any care of responsibility. Do the right thing, Mark. I am not a bad guy and have information you need to take seriously. I There, please contact me immediately so we can work out a way you can be most effective. You know Brueckner is not guilty of abducting Madeleine. Ask in town his friends, gang associates and enemies, and discover his past there. It is critical to his fair trial and proving any alleged abduction. Everything else is perverting the cause of justice. Will you agree to consider investigating the British criminal community and their horrific crimes, please?'' Román Antonio Martín Cánaves: Summary of Controversies and Relationships. Role as Mayor: Román Antonio Martín Cánaves served as the mayor of El Tanque, Tenerife. His tenure was marked by multiple legal issues, leading to his disqualification from office. Corruption Allegations: He faced significant trouble for corruption during his time as mayor, which contributed to his eventual disqualification. Airbnb Connection: There is confusion and speculation about his involvement with an Airbnb property. Some sources suggest that he managed or owned a BnB listed on Airbnb, which has led to further scrutiny and suspicion about his activities. Relationships Family Connections: There are mentions of Román being related to an older woman who was involved in some capacity with the Airbnb property. It is suggested that she might be his sister, although the exact nature of their relationship remains unclear. Public Perception: Román is perceived negatively by some members of the public, who view him as deeply involved in corrupt activities. Mark Williams Thomas inferred that it was Ophelia and her brother buzzing on the door when in fact it was just an excuse to provide an alibi for Ophelia to 'identify' him 20 minutes later as she claims she drove past Jay going in the wrong direction but otherwise seemed to be walking rapidly but otherwise normally. There is no buzzer on the door. Although he bothered to respond telling me there is a buzzer. Asked him why he cares what I think and he blocked me from Facebook and Instagram. All an alibi for Ayub. But why? Drugs? Thank you for bringing up the Madeleine McCann case. Few people associate her name with Mark Williams Thomas. It is an unfortunate association but MWT does not have Madeleine's best interest at heart. He does however cover for her parents, with for knowledge of the events mostly certain implicating their direct involvement of a cover-up and not a stranger abduction. He is a disinformation agent and rotten to the core. And until he goes to Orgiva to investigate and question the friends of Christian Bruckner where he lived before Madeleine was abducted then I shall carry on pursuing him lawfully in the comments section and where ever else he or his name and reputation exist. Jon Clarke asked me to meet and talk to Christian Brueckner's friend, Steven William Farthing, who later abducted me. Madeleine's alleged abductor's friend, abducted ME! Is that not potentially significant? I told Clarke and all of you claiming interest and asking for information but seem to then NOT be interested. I still have Clarke's text messages. Kindly visit Beneficio, in Orgiva and please investigate with utmost urgency, and ask me for avenues to investigate.
This "whole Jay Slater thing" is a typical missing person case that that ended up with them being sadly located deceased just like the 1000s that happen every year. The only thing different to some of the others are the social media detectives using them for mystery entertainment
LBT Global: Head of LBT says repatriation costs £20,000 but other multiple sources says only £3500-£4000. Ai Perplexity search: ''LBT Global is an organization that provides critical and logistical support to victims and their families during serious incidents and trauma overseas. This includes cases of missing persons, deaths, criminal acts, terrorism, disasters, and other serious incidents. The charity offers support, events, facilities, training, and signposting to help people in traumatic circumstances both in the UK and internationally. Key Services and Operations: -Overseas Crisis Support: LBT Global assists families during crises abroad, such as deaths, murders, missing persons, and terrorism. They offer advice, logistical support, repatriation assistance, problem-solving, and fundraising support. - Mutual Relationships: The organization has established a respected relationship with the Foreign, Commonwealth, and Development Office, enhancing their ability to support victims of serious crimes overseas. Organizational Details: - History: Originally known as 'The Lucie Blackman Trust' Limited, the organization was incorporated on April 28, 2006, and later renamed LBT Global. - Structure: It is a private company limited by guarantee without share capital, based in the Isle of Wight, UK. - Financials: For the financial year ending April 5, 2022, the charity reported a total income that included £40,000 from government grants. LBT Global also operates a logistics division, LBT Global Logistics, which specializes in urgent trucking and third-party logistics solutions, including transportation, warehousing, and VESSEL CHARTERING.’’!!? Matthew Searle, the CEO of LBT Global, a missing persons charity, has been critical of the "traumatising" and "vile" comments made by amateur sleuths on social media regarding the disappearance and death of British teenager Jay Slater in Tenerife. Searle stated that the comments were the worst he had seen in over 20 years on the job and that his charity is planning to talk to Home Secretary Yvette Cooper about how to tackle such online behavior. Searle also warned that in the age of social media, whenever there is a real-life crime drama, half the population feels the need to jump on Facebook and set up groups to tell the world what really happened[1]. He said this leads to the spread of wild theories, unsubstantiated rumors, and faked screenshots and videos, which ultimately hinders the search and is "terrifyingly horrible" for the victim's family[1]. In the Jay Slater case, Searle's charity received hundreds of emails from people claiming they knew where the teenager was, which his team had to follow up on. He emphasized that this "just goes on and on and it gets a huge amount of traction, and it's really worrying to the point where our charity thinks it's time that it has to stop." The CEO also mentioned that his charity is now working on bringing Jay Slater's body home, dealing with the "massive paperwork, translations and logistics" and making the process as easy as possible for the family. However, the charity, which was previously known as 'The Lucie Blackman Trust', focuses on providing support and guidance to victims and their families in traumatic situations, including missing persons cases and has now. Matthew Searle is identified as the CEO of LBT Global and has been active in addressing issues related to missing persons, as seen in recent news involving the case of Jay Slater The Lucie Blackman Trust, now known as LBT Global, was registered as a charity on February 28, 2007. It was initially incorporated under the name "The Lucie Blackman Trust Limited" on April 28, 2006. The name change to LBT Global occurred on October 19, 2020123. Matthew Searle is the current CEO of LBT Global. He took over the role in February 2021, succeeding the previous leadership as part of the organization's transition following the rebranding. His intent is to lobby government to restrict online hate speech.’’ Matthew Searle is trying to censor online speech! Seems very dodgy for a charity to be involved in politics.
Early on in Jay's case, I discovered Hayley. I sent her a few messages on Instagram. The last message I received from her said 'interesting', in relation to a video of a (potentially) white Jeep type vehicle seen on CCTV camera at the marina. A day or two after that she had blocked me. I only ever demonstrated the greatest respect and do not think she blocked me for any comments I posted, or messages sent. Until your video here I had wondered what happened. Maybe something was 'wrong' with my information?
I actually am triggered by it as someone who has suffered abuse. I need to see actual ways he would help educate with real information, prevent crimes. McCann is his only case and if he knew what was good for him he'd only be speaking about that. But that can't give him money.
I think Kate is describing an intrusive thought, normally it's a symptom of a disorder like Anxiety. He reminds me of Roy Chubby Brown, but I think Roy actually gets off at people being outraged I think Jon does it to Judge how others react, I think he gets off on it too. This DMC lad made very little expressions and Jon seemed to really want to get him to react. It was a good podcast
@@blankfaces256 It's clear that it gets him off. I wonder what his motive is to this? At first I thought, because he was indulging in paranoid delusions, claims to have had visions and writing in third person about how amazing he is that he might me schizoid, schizotype personality or schizofrenic, and also due to also some of this videos about satanic symbolism converting kids. I was either thinking that or people manipulating him. But then again I've seen him be very reasonable in a lot of videos and I can't connect the two. I don't undertand why he seems to indulge in graphic descriptions of horrific child abuse? He is not seeming reasonable in this video though, some bits being more disturbingly sexual than others. I wonder what his motive is to say these things. And the video where he tells the other guy to watch child p to see the terror. I wonder what his motive was there too? Was it to scare/threaten the man to feed his agenda or was it a weird confession. I agree the guys at his last work saying this was some sort of intervention. I'm wondering more about the circumstances at that job. Is he just scamming people, is he having mental illness and has been convinced to believe in a cult or does he have 'special interests' in kids. He doesn't strike me as a mentally incapable person, he seems to be doing everything for a reason so to me that leaves some kind of grifting, kid interest or covering up for things he's done wrong in the police force. Funny comment about the aesthetics for Buddhism. I do think Maddies mom buried or hid the body after M died on accident and believe some of these theories. Why else would she wash cuddlecat, No mum would. There is just too much evidence against those two. There is actually no limit to people with questionable behaviour in the world. Several things can be true at the same time
I've written some comments previously on his videos about these things regarding the cults, speaking in third person, SRA claims etc. I think Baby P's social workers mat have been badly educated, and maybe some legal and child protection flaws, if they were well educated, maybe overworked, or restricted, only then would I blame them personally, but I don't know enough. Of course it should never have happened. I'm sure baby P's mom is and was a person who is highly manipulative. I have to say I blame the doctor more personally because they didn’t do their job, it’s also mad that he noticed the child was in pain so he stopped the examination, that should prompt even more examination. 😢 This case really pains me and I can’t stand the way Jon is monetizing, when this innocent baby angel needs rest
