InsightMediaTV1 is where we post videos mostly from the trade shows we attend. As display industry analysts and journalists, these videos provide more in-depth technical details, perspective and commentary that you will see on most other sources reporting on technology. Our focus is display-centric, meaning we cover professional and consumer products that are display-based, but we look at the whole ecosystem from research labs and supply chain companies, to major brands and manufacturers making display-based products, to the markets and applications where these products are used. Our main web site is www.insightmedia.info
MUCH better Porotech! Your DPT technology really IS coming along now, BUT there’s STILL a long way to go. That projector I saw on this video, I thought was based on DPT, but it WASN’T, it was still RGB. Keep working on it Porotech, spread DPT all over and banish RGB altogether. Also get display ideas from some of the others, like free form displays, smart lighting, mood lighting and ESPECIALLY the televisions. Put DPT on ALL of that please
Why are the panels all so small with low brightness and colour gamut? I thought microLED was supposed to be the opposite. Low pixel density on very large displays with ultra high brightness and colour gamut?
This is my ignis fatuus(is an atmospheric ghost light seen by travellers at night).I need Ai to teach me how to augment reality consciously with Holography.
You say the handshake between the PC and Display read the what data? I can't understand what word or acronym you are saying. Thanks. Edit: Nevermind I believe I found it out, EDID data "Extended Display Identification Data"
Pixelworks can do more to promote this and other information - which I wish they would. Do you know I also authored a white paper on this tech a few years ago? Motion Grading Comes of Age - www.insightmedia.info/white-papers/
My question is - Why make the LEDs so small that there's 99% black space, when they lose efficiency AND are harder to deposit on the backplane? Just make them 1/4 the size they need to be for a pixel and go with that - it would be way less expensive.... right?
LEDs are the major cost driver in the display so smaller ones are less expensive. It then becomes a trade-off of performance, cost and manufacturability. There is no right solution here, just market options.
It makes me a little angry when these companies mislead customers with terms like "mini led". Implying that it's like actual new tech like micro-led. It's not. These are LCD tvs that use led back-lighting. It still has all the LCD weaknesses. It's not like OLED or Micro-led where each pixel is a light source that can be turned on and off for amazing contrast. Using led lights for local dimming is just not the same as using leds as pixels. Even if there's tens of thousands of dimming zones it's nowhere near the millions of pixels. LCD is still slow with horrible motion blur and halo effects on high contrast scenes. I'd rather go back to CRT than use LCD.
There are a number of segments in this video showing you only a black screen. Was that intentional? My captions were on during those black frames, so it makes me think there is a problem at the source.
I think you’re mistaken. If you look at his reflection later in the video, you’ll see the reflection of his smartphone in a handheld gyro-stabilizer. I don’t know him personally but Chris Chinnock is one of the more articulate journalists reporting on a wide variety of cutting edge display techs.
Solar glass sounds great if economical. The holographic UI also seems very interesting. Great stuff! Would be great to be able to get pricing on the solar glass.
I think you’re mistaken. If you look at his reflection later in the video, you’ll see the reflection of his smartphone in a handheld gyro-stabilizer. I don’t know him personally but Chris Chinnock is one of the more articulate journalists reporting on a wide variety of cutting edge display techs.
Thanks for the video. It seems like you are breaking some big news regarding Innoviz and the spinning galvo mirrors as they have not publicly announced an architecture change from solid-state to mechanical. Did you obtain this information from the Innoviz CEO? Presumably, you received permission to disclose it publicly. Yes?
It would be difficult to auto qualify/certify the experimental Mavin lidar because it's still in A-sample. What we know for sure is that neither Mavin nor Movia are certified for eye-safety by IEC. Every other lidar company has been certified. MicroVision promised eye-safety certification but hasn't got it perhaps because of the novel approach to eye-safety. MicroVision has been developing lidar for 12 years yet ended up buying Ibeo to appropriate their good reputation and revenue while masking their lack of both.
@@Ryan-dv9rl There is a database of IEC certified eye-safe lidar and neither Movia nor Mavin is on it. All other lidars are on it. This is a fact and can be verified by anybody. Have a nice day regardless.
@@kolebronson24 I think they self-declared the lidar "compliant". That's not the same as the third-party IEC certification that they promised. You may remember one picture in Germany with covers blocking the lenses.
@@techwithzeeshan222 is being disingenuous about Mavis, it is class 1 compliant as confirmed by third party experts and can currently be sold and evaluated by OEMs and tier 1s, which is all it needs to be at this stage
correct me if am wrong but Innoviz tech will require more moving parts right?? witch mean more chance/risk of failure something breaking as well as more exotic expensive materials hard to find and makes scalability more difficult.
yes, two moving mirrors, so mechanical parts moving in a tough vibration and shock environment. Not necessarily exotic or expensive, but qualification does seem challenging.
Oh I figured you had the documents since you are making statements that seem to be baseless. Who exactly told you about lidar "auto certification" and that Microvision doesn't have it?
There's a database of ASIL certified components and products. Maybe you should try a search engine. I would link it for your lazy carcass but then my comment gets flagged as "spam". There's also a database for IEC eye-safe products. Spoiler: MVIS isn't on it either. Have a good day.
Pawel Achtel's camera is 9344x7000 pixels but when he refers to 8K content I guess the underlying subject is " for screens larger than 98 inches " rather than the resolution itself. Indeed with such a large view covered by the TV it would quickly become annoying to see flashing images. I guess he also spoke about having a larger field of view which requires using shorter focal length lenses on our cameras.
The large 9Kx7K capture format is important for high fidelity rendering of other formats, including 16:9 8K. He couples with really good lenses too to ensure very high MTF. Not all content needs this clarity, but maybe it is better to capture with high clarity and reduce/massage in post to suite an aesthetic. Yes, you will get a shorter depth of field with his large sensor, so focus becomes more critical, as he mentioned.
@@InsightMediaTV1 I for one appreciate your insight into these companies, it gives a good explanation of things going on behind the scenes. Were you able to visit other lidar booths i'd love to hear your takes on Aeva,Hesai and Luminar. I would have liked to hear your discussions with robosense as well.. Just FYI you are discussing MVIS which is a heavy retail stock so if you wonder why all the comments on it.
So Innoviz's "auto-qualified" MEMS solution is being abandoned for a non-MEMS mirror galvo "concept" that is not auto-qualified. Are we to understand that they are effectively starting over with a new technology because their current solution is inadequate? Did they say how far along are they with the new concept? And when might it be ready at least in engineering sample form, and how long after that would it be auto-qualified? Incidentally, given your statement that Microvision has been developing MEMS scanners for about 30 years, is it their expertise and IP in this area that prevents Innoviz from further advancing their own MEMS solution, forcing a pivot to a different technology?
I am unsure if there is an IP issue with the MEMS tech, but doubt it as there are many suppliers of this kind of scanner. My impression they gave was that they are moving on because of the difficulties in qualifying the MEMS scanner with BMW. On the other hand, the hard work was done, so there are clearly other issues which I did not learn about. No time frame offered for qualifying the galvo solution.
Thanks for the video! Who did you speak to with MicroVision? They have a two 1D electromagnetic MEMS scanner in their state of the art lidar sensor called MAVIN. It has a dynamic FOV and is based off the design found in the laser display scanners found in the Hololens 2. Too bad they didn't talk to you about it.
