What!?

she is a natural in front of the camera!

Castration is more effective.

Many countries just don't consider using actual physical punishment. So we're a bit shocked when we suddenly hear about it.

@@AnjaLSL Most people are surprised to hear that up until the mid 1900s almost every nation used some form of flogging for some crimes, especially sexual crimes. Nowadays, it is mainly less developed nations that do that. Singapore shows that being an advanced nation and retaining corporal punishment are not necessarily mutually exclusive. I see so many videos of women saying how safe they are and how safe they feel in Singapore. I have zero doubt in my mind that the threat of caning for men who commit crimes sexual crimes plays a big part in creating this positive environment for women. Obviously, corporal punishment should be delivered as humanely as possible without unnecessary excesses, but being a man myself, I often think that the threat of some form of whipping, in addition to time in prison, for sexual and violent crimes against women is exactly what is needed to facilitate safe and respectful gender relations and harmony. I say see the benefit in the strong deterrent of flogging not only because of the strong testosterone-fueled impulses that men feel and the physical strength advantage they possess to impose their will, but also because women need to feel that justice is done and harms to them are meaningfully punished. Some people think that whipping is not civilized, but it could be argued that it tames and civilizes the men while making life civilized for women. Some people think that society has evolved beyond the need for flogging, but I say that men as a species have not. This is why I see some wisdom in all the video camera surveillance, caning for sexual misconduct, and even posters reminding men of the consequences of inappropriate sexual touching in the transit system make sense.