Thank you very much for doing that ballistic comparison! Saves me the trouble of doing it myself. Being a hunter in the Eastern states, and not having to worry so much about long range trajectory, I've been leaning towards using the 220 grain, presuming that it would have greater wound channel and hydraulic shock effects. Your test has proven that to be true, conclusively. As long as shot placement is good, those are the only other crucial factors. Obviously, good shot placement is the ultimate factor, though! Thanks again, you done good!
i see this comparison to be like the 9 to 40. for most scenarios they are mostly comparable in effectiveness. but when things start to become less 'normal' is where the 44 can have a more noticeable advantage
@@Call_me_The_Breeze Thank you for the kind words. In reference to the 12 vs 20 gauge, I use a 12 gauge for dove and skeet while my friend uses a 20 gauge. In reality, the 20 gauge seems to do everything the 12 can. Ballistic wise, I personally like a heavier payload but in the end it’s a matter of preference. My friend feels the 20 gauge balances power and performance well.
Nice looking revolvers. The.10mm is reputed as having near.41 magnum performance. You can’t go wrong with either(as long as you have a handgun that meets your needs).
@@user-sl6tq9rv3o A good rifle rest takes my abilities out of the equation and really showcases the firearm’s potential with that particular ammo. Thanks for commenting!
Thanks that's a useful reference point 380 vs 40. Since state troopers used to use 40 for vehicle penetration, this flavor of 380 should be sufficient for barrier penetration. Good work, thanks.
Bravo good job on a well done ballistic test between the 41 and 44 magnum cartridges in revolving pistols! As a specialty series bullet inventor, over the years in my investigations, I have discovered that the 41 magnum to be everything thing the 44 magnum is and then some more. Flatter shooting, better trajectory, in some cases a better penetrator. Keep up the good needed work!
To my way of thinking your test means the Trophy Bonded tip left all its energy in the gel where as the Terminal assent kept it's energy through the gel.
Interesting well done test! Some tests results allegedly reveal that the 41 magnum round to have better trajectory and even better penetration. It depends on several factors especially with the ammo. Which caliber would you prefer for hunting or wilderness defense? Years ago the former owner for Foggy Mountain Black Bear Hunting Outfitters Wayne Boscowitz, (RIP) favorite handgun round for bears was the 41 magnum.
@@jrnbakken4348 Thank you for the kind words. The only percentage I would have is on the bullet retained weight of the 180 gr Trophy Bonded Tip at 96.8 percent if I’m not mistaken. Unfortunately, the other round was not recovered. Hope that helps, and thanks for watching!
@@Revolverguy38 I like a heavy for caliber round, and it seemed to fit the bill balancing penetration and cavitation nicely but I am now considering the 158gr Keith Type Hard Cast from Underwood Ammo in + P. It is a spicy and heavy round for the outdoors in 38 special. Nevertheless, for edc it all depends on your needs and ammo availability, good luck and happy hunting.
@@punisher9oneone Primarily safety since I’m dry firing indoors but I am well aware it is okay to dry fire most modern revolvers. Thank you for commenting!
Those both did well for expanding bullets from standard shelf ammo. Both are more than enough for most chores when using Hardcast SWC bullets with higher sectional density. Let’s say a 300 grain for the 44 mag and a 230 grain for the 41 magnum. It would be cool to see this test done again with underwood hard cast for both.
There is not possible to say which one is better. Both bullets have pros and cons and both of them are designed for particular purpose. Everyone has to try it out and find the sweet spot, it means harmonization of all factors (caliber, barrel lenght, twist rate, usuall distance, type of game). Both bullets are damn good for sure. The ELD-X is originally sport bullet re-designed for hunting purposes, Fusion was designed as a hunting bullet right from the beginning. Here in the old country we have great results with both of them...
Aframe has a bonded front core made much like the trophy bonded bear claw bullet with a heavily crimped rear core and heavy tapered cross member jacket. Fusion are electrochemical plated and are quite soft . They are great for hunting thin skinned game like deer and black bear. A frame is long proven for dangerous and heavy game . Hardcasts are not all made equal but usually perform well when a few factors are gotten correct. Actual hardness and alloy used and shape of ogive and size of meplat all matter. " Keith type" hardcasts are typically the Best design for deep penetration when paired with a lead/ tin alloy or similar extra hard alloy that prevents embrittlement.
@@armus6748 a lot of the forums have people stating that they get over 2900 out of those, I have yet to see anyone state that they where even in the 2800 fps range
Not a valid control of variables. Each shot changes the structure/environment of the wood. You need to use 3 intact boards. Try to strike the middle of each. The flexibility is another variable that needs to be controlled.
