i guess you don`t realize , the K& N filter i installed had about 1/4 to 1/2 inch taller than regular John Deere filter , so it take more oil to get it ti the proper full mark . Also I had a partial container of oil from last year .
@@45NUTS_PART_DEUX it wasn’t clear from my earlier comment. I was actually asking how much oil should I put in my x360 I end up putting two quarts and it seems overfilled drained some out but is there an actual listed amount how much it takes?
@@emperorsanders5744 from the on-line manual foe x300 series IMPORTANT: Do not overfill. Some residual oil could remain in engine after draining. Overfilling can cause smoking, hard starting, fouling of spark plug, and oil saturation of air filter. Add oil slowly and stop to check oil level every few ounces to avoid overfilling. Add oil no higher than FULL mark on dipstick. Do not overfill. X300, X304 and X310: Begin with approximately 1.7 L (1.8 qt). X320, X324 and X360: Begin with approximately 2.1 L (2.2 qt). manuals.deere.com/omview/OMM173266_19/?tM=
No , it was a struggle to route the belt around one of the idler pulley that had a anti-kick out bracket and i had to look at the belt diagram in the manual to make sure i was putting it on right .
Those are a really nice tractor,and the changeable tranny filter and fluid is the best feature. Im lookin at 2 different models an x310 i found for $2200 and an x360 i gound for $2600. Both are in about the same condition with between 300 and 400 hours on them. Id live the x360,but its almost a 3 hour drive from me. Ive still got a couple days ti decide. Hopefully something will come of it. Thanks for sharing these videos.
Even back then WTF can't people back them up into position.Try backing up a old TJ skidder bucket and trailer,it's a lot harder to do than that stupid little trailer. On the TJ skidder bucket you had to keep an eye on the boom that stuck out over the front as it would go the opposite direction you want to turn.Then the trailer was another trick and you had to keep an eye on all of it. Once you done it awhile it was easy.....and the steering on the TJ was stick,not a big steering wheel...lol How about farmers that have balers and wagons...... Hell of a lot of work detaching that trailer (even though it's a pintle hitch)and then reattaching it to the front,then detaching and reattaching it to the rear.......must be a Britts "better idea" like that recovery SNAFU along with the "NCO" standing beside the winch cables under load...especially that kinked (damaged) cable.
@@45NUTS_PART_DEUX if I did they couldn't have been any worse than yours but you missed the point entirely. It wasn't your ability to make a video it was the sorrowful way you accomplished the task at hand. Make all the videos you like but you have very little mechanical skills. Nobody is gonna argue that point.
I sent my mother to John Deere to get transaxle oil to do the trans oil change and they told her she didn’t need it because it’s a closed system, so now I have to go back and purchase it myself and boy are they gonna get a earful. So angry
Hmmmm... I wonder which bright spark had the idea of training REME airborne units in tank recovery? Because perhaps I'm missing something, but airborne units in WW2 had no tanks because planes couldn't transport them. Moreover, planes couldn't transport the huge Scammel tractors needed in tank recovery either.... so let's make a training film about such an impossibly unrealistic situation. What can we say?.... Thank God for the Navy.... unless, of course, it was all part of a cunning plan (of the Baldrick variety) to let the training film fall into enemy hands so that they might believe that we actually could airlift such vehicles. Incidentally, my uncle joined REME at the beginning of WW2 as a 2nd Lieutenant and ended up as a full Colonel, (temporary Brigadier and reputed to be the youngest in the British Army) specialising in ... tank recovery, repair and refurbishment in battle zones. Unless my uncle was a genius, such rapid promotion can only have come about because REME was useless at it the beginning of the war, don't you think?
My grandad, Craftsman E A Powell was in the REME at this time. He was great at his job but I can’t help thinking there would have been less running and more tea and cigarettes.
The later version I had in the early 1970's had a 10 ltr Meadows Petrol engine , very slow running ,6 speed gear box . We normally moved off in 3 rd gear when not towing . Think it did about 5 miles to the gallon UK , the clutch was prone to slipping, the best method to alleviate that was to spray it from underneath with the pyrene fire extinguisher. A marvelous truck full of character and a joy to drive .
I'm not a combat engineer, or a tanker, but I was a forward observer in both lav 25, and M1 Abrams. Not much has changed when it comes to this stuff tbh.
Great stuff. I'm not sure exactly how the holdfasts work, but it looks as if a big load (4/5 of the total) is taken by steel rods driven into the ground. I can imagine situations where this would not work, either because the ground is too soft, or where it is rocky.
Excellent. Now if I come across a tank in the ditch here in Canada winter I know how to pull it out. Just need to get those parts & ropes into the trunk of the EEPmobile.
But Rich, you are rich. 🤣 Also, I have a 70’s Military One Ton Landrover. Built on the same principles as these wartime behemoths but can be used as a daily drive. As long as you’ve got a set of spanner’s and don’t mind knuckles tattooed with grease. About 7000€ so not that expensive.
I find these videos fascinating. Take simple technology add a firm understanding of physics mix with a bit of work smart and the job is done. I always find it funny how much direction they want the crew to give the driver. You'd swear they think he can't see out his windows.
I love old training films or films explaining tactical and strategic operation, or showing new military equipment and technologies. They simply don't make em like this anymore.
And this shows why they made the M88 Recovery Vehicle. All that manual labor and time when a recovery vehicle can brute force armor recovery. Everything is heavy and put it in mud and its worse. All the tanks I saw recovered were in deep mud or sand
How about a Soviet (Ukrainian) flying truck. As simple and flies as slowly as a truck drives: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-z7I3Illsuqg.html
I am surprised that they don't have a A-Frame so to speak ( sky hook) that can come up by winch power. Just saying with all this other heavy haul manual labor intensive work. The boom seems to be straight out of bed of front truck( what ever British call front truck) why they did not make them lower to ground on trailer All heavy hauls are ( low boys) but I was not even though about being born when they made this so what do I know about British heavy hauls recovery. Interesting to watch from back then.
My Uncle was in the REME , he later opened his own Garage ..in time he aquired one of these Monsters for his breakdown , it was a total monster of a unit.
