One of the best demonstration of Chi Sao and explanation. Too bad this video is hidden within the bowls of RU-vid. Just over a 1k views on this channel -such a shame.
Hmmm....bei den meisten ist der Fauststoß zu weit weg vom Gegner ....erreicht ihn nicht...Schulter mit der rechten Seite rein...um mit dem linken Arm anzugreifen...dieser Weg ist länger ,als mit dem rechten Arm mit einem Backfist anzugreifen....macht mehr Sinn und logisch für mich
Every EWTO school still has the standard black and white folded arms photo of GGM Leung Ting on the wall. He has long since been removed from the Master data bank on the EWTO homepage and GGM Kernspecht has since introduced so many additional concepts to the EWTO syllabus, As to whether they still have contact? Is anyone’s guess....
@@fretboardmaster70 What do you think of all that additional material KK added in? Essential ... or clutter? I was an early disciple of LT. My Si-dai travelled to Europe and learned from the EWTO up to 5th Level Practition Grade. I never made it that far, but personally I still prefer the directness of the HK approach as I learned it in the US about 40 years ago. FWI in the original LT curriculum taught in the US, this was called the "3rd Section of Chi Sau".
There's nothing illegal in wing chun that wouldn't be allowed in the UFC. They kick and punch like any other style. Everything in this video is allowed in the UFC. Even Muay thai had to take out some of its illegal moves (downward elbows to the top of the head for example) and its still a very effective style
Wrong, in MMA like you said you cannot use the downward elbows which are used in the biu tze form, you cannot kick to the groin, you cannot kick straight to the knee, you cannot hit on the throat and you cannot hit someone in the spine.
The tan sao at that height has never worked...its too easy for the top hand to use it to bounce off the tan sao and get hit to the head. One should never provide a free straight line to the head in chi sao. Note: This is an opinion - not criticism.
Guck genau hin, es könnte ja sein, dass sich jemand nicht hebeln lässt ! Die meisten werden das auch tun......und dann ?? Es wird evtl. jemand rufen: Hol mal Leung Ting, der hebelt alle und Alles !! Weitermachen mit dem Theater !!
you could just do a street fight with a ufc guy and a wing chun guy with no rules then it's fair but wing chun doesn't work in the cage because alot of it's techniques are intended to attack vulnerable points (many aren't allowed to be hit with sport rules) and I was taught to break the hands with elbow strikes so I guess wing chun could fight in the cage but it would be utter shit
pineapplejizz and wing tsun is good for the "don t expect" factor. in street no on aggressor expect you ll use wing tsun, in the cage its a 1 on 1 so you know you must knock down the enemy and the enemy know he must knock down you at all cost. wing tsun is efficient in street and not so much in the cage for this. however someone like boztepe would have not so much problem in the cage against a normal person. a lot of mma fighters punch with single/double hard punches, if a wing tsun master like boztepe avoid that punch, go on a side and start with his powerful chainpunches, its over for the other. however who practice wt dont do it to use it on a ring but for personal satisfaction and street selfdefence. a lot better. a wt fighter must not prove anything to anyone. boztepe is a MONSTER in what he do and thats really ok. that he fight and win on a ring or not.
You didn't understand me. If he hits someone in the balls or in the throat etc. in UFC he would be disqualified, that's allowed in WT beacuse everything is allowed in self defense, but in UFC it isn't, so I don't see the point in WT fighter joining the UFC.
LOl, many wing chung people have tried and failed. Besides, according to this video he can just throw them all out of balance so easily that he would not need to do much.
