"Welcome to Universe Reader, your gateway to the mysteries of the cosmos. Join us on a captivating journey of scientific exploration, as we delve into the wonders of the universe, uncovering celestial phenomena and unlocking the secrets of the cosmos."
OK FIRST SET UP A MOON BASE AS A START OFF POINT, WITH EVERYTHING WE NEED TO KEEP A SUSTAINABLE RESEARCH LAB .YES I KNOW ITS HARD BUT IF POSSIBLE.FROM SIMPLE MOON EXPLORATION, HAVE A COMMUNICATION CENTER, THEN START EXPLORING FURTHER
Yes, But problem is that we don't have sufficient technology to explore it deeply. But who knows about future. But we are growing each day in technology so it's highly possible we could travel to there in future.
TRUE, BUT IMAGINE WE START SMALL ON THE MOON JUST IMAGINE A SMALL HABITABLE APARTMENT, AS YOU EXPLORE AROUND THE AREA THEN YEARS DOWN THE ROAD YOU BUILD A GREENHOUSE, WAIT FOR TECHNOLOGY TO CATCH UP OR IMPROVE WHAT WE KNOW, & HAVE, WATER PURIFIERS, CO2 SCRUBBERS ,ETC. IF RESOURCES ARE USEABLE, EXPAND. BUT DON'T GO TO CRAZY.JUST ENOUGH TO FINALLY BUILD A SMALL TOWN FULL OF ENGINEERS, SCIENTISTS, ENVIRONMENTALISTS, DOCTORS. HELL BY THAT TIME WE MAY HAVE SATELLITES,TELESCOPE WE'D BE ABLE SEE POTENTIAL DANGERS NEARBY BY A BIT BETTER NO LIGHT POLLUTION UP THERE. AND DECADES DOWN THE ROAD USE THE MOON AS ARE NEW JUMP POINT AS WE USED THE EARTH TO GET TO THE MOON.
Here is the explanation for dark matter. General Relativity predicts dilation, not singularities. In the 1939 journal "Annals of Mathematics" Einstein wrote - "The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of General Relativity predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters (star clusters) whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light." He was referring to the phenomenon of dilation (sometimes called gamma or y) mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. It's the phenomenon behind the phrase "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". Time dilation is just one aspect of dilation, it's not just time that gets dilated. A graph illustrates its squared nature, dilation increases at an exponential rate the closer you get to the speed of light. Dilation will occur wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass because high mass means high momentum. There is no singularity at the center of our galaxy. It can be inferred mathematically that dilation is occurring there. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. More precisely, everywhere you point is equally valid. This is the explanation for dark matter. The "missing mass" is dilated mass. Dilation does not occur in galaxies with low mass centers because they do not have enough mass to achieve relativistic velocities. To date, 6 very low mass galaxies including NGC 1052-DF2 and DF4 have been confirmed to show no signs of dark matter. This also explains why all planets and all binary stars have normal rotation rates, not 3 times normal.
Since other countries have sent missions to the moon, they might get all the resources. So the greed oriented west has to do its dog in the manger thing, and get them first. This is the reason for renewed interest, nothing more.
Moon has huge land I think more than earth so capturing it by one nation seems impossible. We all nation have to work in team to import things from there.
The smart money will be invested in companies searching for the best locations to mine raw materials and possibly even drill for oil... on Mars. Let's say it's discovered that there is a whole ecosystem of life, from fungi to plants and from single celled organisms to complex microscopic tardigrades living on permanently airborne particles of dust and soil in the clouds of Venus... that would be a marvel of science but, it wouldn't benefit almost anyone financially... at least not nearly as much as would be made by a professional prospector acquiring the permits and rights to deposits of ores, minerals and metal deposits on the Red Planet. Executives from every mining, drilling, smelting and refining company is booking flights with SpaceX to start the carving up of the Martian landscape like a holiday turkey because there are colonists coming and they're gonna need stuff when they arrive.
I hope the rocket is proven to reach high orbits and beyond. USA commercial companies are having problems with untested rockets and satellites on moon missions.
Astronauts and satellites 🛰️ will be forced to come back to earth 🌏 to face judgement day ( geomagnetic storm category 5 )(punishment of Earth 🌎 of humanity demise )
It's very nice when these countries go to space, they make space stations and they all put their flag and the name of the country on them, but when it's space junk then it's humans and they're not ashamed.
Nothing to worry about. First the solar storms peak every 11 years. It's not unusual. Then a solar storm doesn't have the effects many of the click bait stories claim. It can't do anything to electronic devices or power plants. It's not like lightning. It's a tiny voltage difference of a minute fraction of a volt per meter. So the only way something can be damaged is if it is connected to very very long cables. The only effect is on step up / down transformers that are connected to cables tens or hundreds of kilometers long. These are the electricity sub stations you may see - which convert very high voltages from long distance cables into the lower voltages for domestic use. Even then those cables also have to run in the air above ground where there is resistive ground rock because you need a voltage difference to build up between the cable and the ground. If the ground below the cable is conductive (e.g. wet sedimentary rocks) there won't be any voltage difference between the cable and the ground because the weak magnetic fields from the solar storm will build up exactly the same voltages in both cable and the ground. The damage is caused by voltage differences between the cable and the ground in the step up / down transformers. It turns out that only a few places are actually vulnerable. The 1989 Quebec powercut was possible because of the resistive ground rock below Quebec as well as its high altitude. But since then they have made the step up / down transformers much more resilient and that powercut wouldn't happen again with modern transformers. The only ones at risk are old models or a new model that is near the end of its operating life and about to be replaced anyway. They make the transformers triply redundant in case one of them fails, so that even if a few of them fail in a Carrington type event - it would be an expensive bit of kit to replace, but the customer is likely to not even notice. In the USA most of the grid companies now sign up to an insurance scheme which keeps a stockpile of road-mibile transformers - it's really meant for hurricane damage and such-liek so that they can be up and running quickly after a hurricane - but it would also work for solar storms an dmean that they coudl replace the damaged transformers and be up and running quickly in the rare case where all three are damaged or to get back to normal levels of triple redundancy. The electricity grid is very resilient, a bit like the internet, if there is a cable or sequence of cables available to get the electricity from A to B then they can reconfigure to use it instead of the one they usually use. Expense would be similar to a hurricane after a Carrington style event but most likely no powercuts or just a few localized in the most vulnerable places. The powergrid companies would know where is most vulnerable in their network also there are a few hours of warning of a solar storm after it passes the SOHO satellite between Earth and the Sun, so they would be able to respond to put their equipment into a safer operating mode before it hits and we have longer term projections of solar storms, though less accurate, of the order of days to a week or so. debunkingdoomsday.quora.com/What-would-the-effects-be-of-a-major-solar-storm-Short-term-local-power-cuts-for-hours-not-widespread-blackout-for-mo As for the flares themseslves we can't have a superflare. We can't have a superflare. For a short time a few years ago some astronomers thought superflares were possible after they spotted them in a survey of stars that resemble our sun, only some of those stars and they didn't know what made a difference between the ones with and without superflares. They never thought they were likely for our sun, because we'd have seen the signs of them in the moon rocks, if there had been any in the last 4.5 billion years. Something that hasn't happened for 4.5 billion years would have to be very rare. But they now know that our sun can't do them. They now understand why some stars have them and others don't, and ours is the wrong kind of star to ever have them. It is to do with how fast it spins and for a superflare the polar region has to spin faster than the equatorial region (the sun isn't solid so different parts of it can spin at different rates). For our sun, it spins too slowly and the polar regions spin more slowly than the equatorial regions and its magnetic field isn't strong enough. So it can't do them. debunkingdoomsday.quora.com/Can-superflares-happen-on-our-sun-observation-and-modeling-combined-says-no-only-bright-flares-equivalent-to-our-sun
How could any civilization run a simulation with everything being solid? I would love to know the technology to produce some thing solid we would be just a beam of light, but we are solid. How does that work? Thanks for the upload you guys
First of all simulation is just a theory and we don't have any solid evidence to proof it. But yeah in simulation we can create solid things. Solid or other state of mater are recognised by our mind we can code our mind in such a way that it can understand matter properties. Like if we add ai in pubg and taught them that this type of touching or material is solid then they can easily tell about material. Because they don't care about material they know property of solid and we have simulated that property in our simulation. In our simulation water is flowing, Rock is hard.
No, time and space are absolute as indicated by Galilean Relativity, and they have nothing to do with each other. Only the present exists, the past is gone, and the future is yet to be. Mathematicians like Einstein's have tricked us with their mathematics saying the effects are real, when they are simply describing an optical illusion, a trick of light. The effects of Relativity are not true, they just appear that way due to an optical illusion. A pencil partially in water appears broken, but it is not really and can be proven by taking it out and verifying the pencil is not broken. The illusion of Relativity is the same way. Nearfield light is instantaneous, and using it we can see that the effects of Relativity are not true. Lengths have not contracted, and Time has not dilated. Keep in mind that no experiment can prove a theory right, it can only provide evidence that it might be right. But just one experiment or a logical fallacy in a theory can prove a theory wrong. I have provided both below:
But many experiments proved theory of relativity. Then how could you say it a trick by Einstein. Why we change the time of satellite again and again to get the exact location. If it's absolute then there is no need to change the satellite's clock time. I would like to say that no theory is 100% right but it doesn't mean that it is 100% wrong.
@@UniverseReader There are many reasons experiments can be wrong: concidence, errors in measurement, another physical mechanism, experimenter bias, pressure to publish theoretical expected results,.etc. And lastly most are farfield measurements where instantaneous nearfield behavior is not observed. In my research I have presented 2 very important results: 1) the logic falicy in Relativity, 2) the experimental and theoretical reality of instantaneous nearfield fields that violate Relativitiy. Any theory with a logical fallacy built into it is by definition wrong, no matter how many experiments prove it right or how many people believe it is right. Also, no experiment can prove a theory right, but one experiment or a logical fallacy in the theory can prove a theory absolutely wrong. I have provided both. I am not saying Relativity is wrong. I am saying that the effects it describes are just an optical illusion. If you observe things with farfield light, you will see Relativistic effects, but the effects are not real, and only an optical illusion. The proof is the logic argument showing a fallacy in Relativity, and the many experiments.and theory that prove instantaneous fields exist. Gravity. Light, Electric fields. magnetic field, and quantum entanglement.
My point is that since the advent of modern physics, scientists have come to believe more in strange interpretations of their mathematics and less in the physicality of the real world, which is classical. 100 years later we believe that time and space are flexible, gravitation is due to the warping of spacetime, and in the quantum world, we believe particles are not real until measured, and are in a probabilistic superposition of states before measurement. The interpretation of Physics is becoming more and more magical, when solid classical explanations exist. I am not arguing about the mathematics, but the interpretation of the mathematics.
Relativity is just an optical illusion, and because all of modern physics is based on Relativity, modern physics is fundamentally wrong and needs to be rethought. Relativity has a simple built in logical fallacy, and no theory based on a logical fallacy can be true, no matter how many experiments seem to prove it, or how many people say it is true. Below is a very simple logical argument highlighting the logical fallacy, using the same terminology Einstein used to derive Relativity. According to Relativity, observers on a moving train and on a stationary train platform will disagree on the size of the ""Train"" and the passage of time on the ""Train"". This is a complete logical contradiction if the size and the passage of time of the train are real. If the size of the train is real, then the ""Train"" can not be both contracted and not contracted. The same goes for the observed passage of time on the ""Train"". If these effects are observed, then the only possible conclusion is that it is an optical illusion. Things that are real must appear to be same from all frames of reference. If not, then by definition it is an illusion. Again the argument is very simple and it is the argument Einstein used to derive Relativity, and no acceleration is used in the argument. A train with length (L) traveling at constant velocity (v) relative a stationary observer on a station platform. According to Relativity, the stationary observer will see the train contracted (L/r, where r is the Relativistic gamma), whereas an observer on the train will see it not contracted (L). So the train is both contracted (L/r) and not contracted (L) depending on the observer. This is a complete contradiction (L not equal L/r) and can not be true if length is real. The same argument applies to passage of time on the Train, where both observers will disagree on the passage of time. If time is real, it can not be both dilated and not dilated (T not equal rT). If space and time are observed to be both large and small simultaneously for one inertial reference frame, such as the ""Train"", then it must be an optical illusion. This argument is only the tip of the iceberg. There is much more evidence including both theoretical and experimental, so please keep reading. Hi my name is Dr William Walker and I am a PhD physicist and have been investigating this topic for 30 years. It has been known since the late 1700s by Simone LaPlace that nearfield Gravity is instantaneous by analyzing the stability of the orbits of the planets about the sun. This is actually predicted by General Relativity by analyzing the propagating fields generated by an oscillating mass. In addition, General Relativity predicts that in the farfield Gravity propagates at the speed of light. The farfield speed of gravity was recently confirmed by LIGO. Recently it has been shown that light behaves in the same way by using Maxwell's equations to analyze the propagating fields generated my an oscillating charge. For more information search: William Walker Superluminal. This was experimentally confirmed by measuring radio waves propagating between 2 antennas and separating the antennas from the nearfield to the farfield, which occurs about 1 wavelength from the source. This behavior of gravity and light occurs not only for the phase and group speed, but also the information speed. This instantaneous nature of light and gravity near the source has been kept from the public and is not commonly known. The reason is that it shows that both Special Relativity and General Relativity are wrong! It can be easily shown that Instantaneous nearfield light yields Galilean Relativity and farfield light yields Einstein Relativity. This is because in the nearfield, gamma=1since c= infinity, and in the farfield, gamma= the Relativistic gamma since c= farfield speed of light. Since time and space are real, they can not depend on the frequency of light used. This is because c=wavelength x frequency, and 1 wavelength = c/frequency defines the nearfield from the farfield. Consequently Relativity is an optical illusion. Objects moving near the speed of light appear to contract in length and time appears to slow down, but it is just what you see using farfield light. Using nearfield light you will see that the object has not contracted and time has not changed. For more information: Search William Walker Relativity. Since General Relativity is based on Special Relativity, General Relativity must also be an optical illusion. Spacetime is flat and gravity must be a propagating field. Researchers have shown that in the weak field limit, which is what we only observe, General Relativity reduces to Gravitoelectromagnetism, which shows gravity can be modeled as 4 Maxwell equations similar in form to those for electromagnetic fields, yielding Electric and Magnetic components of gravity. This theory explains all gravitational effects as well as the instantaneous nearfield and speed of light farfield propagating fields. So gravity is a propagating field that can finally be quantized enabling the unification of gravity and quantum mechanics. The current interpretation of quantum mechanics makes no sense, involving particles that are not real until measured, and in a fuzzy superposition of states. On the other hand, the Pilot Wave interpretation of Quantum Mechanics makes makes much more sense, which says particles are always real with real positions and velocities. The particles also interact with an energetic quantum field that permeates all of space, forming a pilot wave that guides the particle. This simpler deterministic explanation explains all known quantum phenomena. The only problem is that the Pilot Wave is known to interact instantaneously with all other particles, and this is completely incompatible with Relativity, but is compatible with Galilean Relativity. But because of the evidence presented here, this is no longer a problem, and elevates the Pilot Interpretation to our best explanation of Quantum Mechanics. *RU-vid presentation of above argument: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-sePdJ7vSQvQ.html *Paper it is based on: William D. Walker and Dag Stranneby, A New Interpretation of Relativity, 2023: vixra.org/abs/2309.0145
Според, учителя Петър Дънов, темата,, Бог ще разтърси земята,, и анализ на картината на потопа, датата на маите за края на света е на,2222, на 22 12 година, астероид, който пресича опашката на комета и целия товар пада в,, Полуостров пьягина Мост Толстой Русия, вземете мерки успех, ако искате да видите картината на потопа,, град Велико Търново село Самоводене ул мрамор 2,, Ангел,,, това не е шега, ще останат една шепа хора,
Nam mô cao đài tiên ông đại bồ tát ma ha tát thường hằng Nam mô cao đài tiên ông đại bồ tát ma ha tát thường hằng Nam mô cao đài tiên ông đại bồ tát ma ha tát thường hằng Nam mô cao đài tiên ông đại bồ tát
They say that a fly's brain can process information 10 times faster than humans. That is why they are so hard to swat. To a fly, we move in slow motion. Could it be that perceived time flow is dependent on how fast an organism's brain processes information?
@@UniverseReader The Light is returning... Salvation The End The End is the beginning of the word endorphin The End is the beginning of The Word The End is the beginning of Love’s promise To end Manmade trauma, grief and pain. To end inner turmoil and confusion To end abuse, regret and shame To end the sickness of mind delusion To end the trauma, grief and pain. The End is the beginning of The Word endorphin The End is the beginning of The Word The End is the beginning of God’s promise To end Manmade trauma, grief and pain. The End is the promise of salvation The End is the promise of re birth The end is the conscious healing message For Peace and Heaven here on Earth. The End is the beginning of the word endorphin The End is the beginning of The Word The End is the beginning of Love’s promise To end Manmade trauma, grief and pain. The End is the promise of New Heaven Where truth will set us free from pain Where mourning will be completed For Love to reside in us again. The End is the beginning of The Word endorphin Where ‘ the stones will cry out’ for rebirth The end is the beginning of The Word endorphin For Peace and Heaven here on Earth. 🕊💖🕊 ✨✨✨✨ ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Js81kd91AK4.html 🎶🎵🎶🎵🎶🎵🎶🎵 A New Song in progress... Halleluyah #Timetoendallabuse #endabusenow #Timetoendallabuse #Healthisnotacortisol #Peaceisnotacortisol #Joyisnotacortisol #Parousia Maranatha ... 🕊💖🕊 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-5QBQRqquQu0.html ✨✨✨✨ 🎁🌲🎄🌲🔥💝 Greetings, Jesus Christ is returning... A Vision of Light, Sun Revelation ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Js81kd91AK4.html 'Blessed are those who mourn for they will be comforted...' Matthew 5:4 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ZQLxyn3m-Ps.html I see a new heaven and new earth... Revelation 21 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-979kh52duRY.html&feature=share8 God is Love and Light for enlightenment of Love Anointed namely Jesus Christ who is returning quickly for Healing All Nations and Heaven on Earth as promised for The Promised Land to come... HalleluYah #Loveisnotacortisol stress hormone caused by lies, betrayals, corruption, division, abuse and sin which pays the wages of death...Romans 6:23 Death of God's Holy Spirit of Peace via a quiet conscience with God and self for Peace with others via a quiet conscience with God and self for Peace with others... #Timetoendallabuse Time for Heaven on Earth as promised for The Promised Land to come... God's #Loveisnotacortisol stress hormone of fear but a naturally occuring endorphin blood made whole and One in our body which is The Temple for God's Love to dwell...The End is the beginning of The Word endorphin His Love in our blood 🕊💖🕊✨✨✨✨ Amen, Ameen, Shalom, New Jerusalem: Twofold Peace for Heaven on Earth...our body is The Temple for God's Love to dwell for Peace of The Holy Spirit of Peace via a quiet conscience with God and self for Peace with others via The Holy Spirit 🕊💖🕊 Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour who is returning...HalleluYah🕊💖🕊 ✨✨✨✨
If you had any type of question in your mind just write here in comments. We will try to answer in comment or make a video to explain your question in details. Thanks for watching this video
Bro, All facts are on the basis many theories and solar storm is real. Super solar storm can devastate our earth. For more detail, watch full video on channel. I have also covered many past even in that video
Covering this topic in a short is very difficult so I made a long video and which already uploaded on this channel go there and watch it please. Please be sure to subscribe us for more upcoming videos
Actually universe is so big that our one theory can't explain this whole universe. We required a lot of theories for covering this whole universe. Many theories had been given already but most the theories are still not given. So we have a lot to explore and to publish.
