I think you got yourself some common milkweed (Asclepias syriaca) there. Check out our video on Asclepias sullivanti and A. syriaca to learn the differences. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-D_5U93iPYfg.html
11 years late and im trying to do this with my backyard in Tulsa. I'm in the Osage Cuestas ecoregion so everything here should be a mix of tall grass prairie and oak-hickory forest
Today is 6 June 2023 and a random thought entered my mind when I was out in the garden mulching my tomato and chile plants. I wished that I had ordered some Fatalii seeds for this year, and I was immediately reminded of your channel. I decided to come back to check out the first videos that helped me in my years in the garden.
Well no. The single living organism is the Sea Forest its Approximately 200,000 years. A sprawling sea grass meadow ten miles long near Spain ranks as the oldest known single organism on Earth.
That wasn't long enough AT ALL true but it was great, amazing, informative, interesting footage I loved it just again wasn't long enough. Thanks for sharing.
Opening up to the public is not a good idea. Look at Yellowstone National Park in the USA or Banff National Park in Canada. People destroy, not preserve.
It's crazy that the word ape through its Old English root word apa first referred to the Barbary ape and then it was the general word for all non-man simians before the introduction of the word monkey in the 16th century and then it later became restricted to the non-man hominoids. By man, I mean a "human" regardless of age or gender. By non-man hominoids, I mean "apes." The reason I called it an ape is because the word ape originally referred to this cercopithecid and not because it doesn't appear to have a tail. By cercopithecid, I mean an Old World "monkey." Do you think so?
The lizard is still a lizard. It’s even still a wall lizard. So actually it is proving that evolution is NOT happening. Evolutionism does bait and switch when it teaches people to see adaptation and call that evolution. This reminds me of the argument with Darwin’s finches. Yes, they changed some in their beaks. So what? So how does that prove from goo through the zoo to you? All over the planet we find finches, both living and in fossils. They may have different colors, different sizes of beaks, different sizes overall, but guess what? Every last one of them is still a 100 % finch. Why isn’t there just one fossil or one living finch that is turning into something that isn’t a finch? Why? Because evolution is a faith based pseudoscience religion. Why are the wall lizards still….wall… lizards? Wake up fella. You are being had. Find out who you really are and it’s not what evolution tells you. That is pseudoscience bunk.
That isn't how evolution works. Evolution is about adaptation. Through adaption you can have speciation. The process of speciation is so gradual that it would take thousands of generations for it to happen.
@@l3fth4nd like virtually all who defend evolution on RU-vid, you show that you don’t even know the basics. First of all, we have seen speciation occur without it taking much time at all. For example, walking stick bugs in our lifetimes. But as I tried to show you in the first post, guess what? They are still walking stick bugs! Just as I told you that the finches are staying finches and the turtles are staying turtles. Apple trees are staying apple trees, fish are staying fish, birds are staying birds, bugs are staying bugs, bacteria are staying bacteria, no matter how many new species Of them are seen. They ain’t evolving. They are showing the exact opposite of evolution. Stasis. Yes new species do occur. I am betting that you don’t even know what the other taxonomic groupings are. Like taxonomic families, orders, classes, phylum. In spite of the spiel that you were given by evolution, though the animals do produce new species, they always stay in their taxonomic families, not to mention in their orders and classes and phyla. This is what we see in Billions and billions inthe fossil record and in the countless lifeforms around us. Go try and find an example of any animal moving into one of those different taxonomic areas. Evolutionists tell us that it happens. But the evidence says the opposite. For example, people like Richard Dawkins tell you that you came from bacteria. Bacteria have been observed around the clock around the globe since 1670. No matter how much they change, no matter how many species they produce, they say bacteria in their bacterial domain. How are they going to turn into you then? Friend, you really are clueless. You don’t understand science, and you don’t really even understand evolution. I’m sure you’ve probably never heard of logical fallacies. So naturally you wouldn’t know, or observe, that evolution is solidly founded on them, most especially on presuming omniscience, and correlation does not imply causation. You’ve not learned how to think scientifically or logically, so you bought into evolution hook line and sinker. As I once did. You think you just have to quote some mantra, like that adaptation causes new species and that proves evolution, and you’re doing your science duty. Again, new species don’t turn into other taxonomic groups. No matter how much they adapt. Go try and find evidence to the contrary. I don’t have the time to educate you. But you can educate yourself if you have an honest heart and an honest mind and are willing to look outside the box and learn to think for yourself. There are resources all over the net for you if you will only access them. I suggest starting with a short and funny vid called SEX Crevo Rant 13. Nothing personal, but you are now on mute, because you have nothing to say that is based on actual science or logic, at this time.
@@loricalass4068 It took over 200,000,000 years for mammals to first appear and another 50,000,000 years for whales to appear. From the first four legged mammal to the end result of the first whale, the changes would have been so gradual that not at any point could you have pointed at a single species and declared it as the first whale. Demanding a single species must be completely something else from a single speciation event demonstrates what little you know about evolution. Again, proving that not only do the deniers of evolution not understand what they’re criticizing, but displaying their ignorance of natural science.
Cupressus dupreziana, Tamrit Gorge, Tassili N'Ajjer Plateau, Djanet, Illizi, Algeria. The rock art paintings are from Sefar and/or Djabbaren, nearby. Probably the greatest art collection of that era and well worth the visit. Yes, those people still tend the same looking cattle further south in the Sahel; Fulani, Pulaar, Wolof, Wodabe.
What does your growing peppers and god has to do with each other. What a pity this would have been quite a nice video if not for your deviation from the subject. Are you trying to make atheists of everyone that whatches or do you want to show us how to grow peppers. Make up your mind!!!!
Europeans evolved from neanderthal aka nordic white skin hominids that evolved into the white skinned sapien! Africans are erectus aka the dark skinned hominid! You can look at pictures of erectus compared to neanderthal and sapien and see the clear difference! Asians all come from the peking men , Australian aboriginals come from Australopithicus aforoensis and 3 other sub variants of australiopithicus! Middle east is in Africa btw!
Also middle easterns are hybrid of erectus and Greek/Roman and slavic sapien , that's why middle easterns have lighter skin and are far far smarter than the darker skinned Africans! An adult erectus is only as smart as a 2 yr old neanderthal or sapien! Erectus are extremely violent and havent progressed passed the spear and bow age in west Africa. The thing that made middle eastern smart enough to move from tribal to religious societies is because the introduction of neanderthal and sapien DNA, neanderthal and sapien have 3 times the brain size of erectus and erectus are tribal, all native Israelites were hybrids of sapien neanderthal it is the "white" Gene's that allowed the birth place of religion as much as you are probably disappointed to hear that but you also should be dissapointed to hear that the white man that you hate so much is really you. You are a white man, most modern humans have sapien aka white DNA. All sapiens came from neanderthal and all neanderthal and sapien evolved in freezing cold nordic areas that's why their skin is the same color as snow and those areas took incredible intelligence to survive in compared to Africa where every tree produces food in nordich areas they survived off hunting and bending the rules of nature to survive in an environment their ancestors could never have survived in, erectus had no reason to use fire in Africa while nordich hominids aka sapien and neanderthal needed fire and complex shelters to survive the night. Neanderthals were the first hominids to create jewelry and complex clothing and tools and shelters and it was only after they became very advanced thay a subgroup branched called sapien and the sapien and neanderthal interbred and today all white people have over 10% neanderthal DNA and the rest sapien DNA while west Africans aka blck Africans have 99.99% erectus DNA and middle easterns have more white DNA than erectus DNA which is why they are so much smarter than erectus and why erectus are the most violent hominid on earth to this day and commit 99.99% of violent crimes in every country they make up 5% or more of the population in present day.