@@TheEntireRobot lol 😂 just a regular gigging musician me. I still have mine no issues in about 5 and a half years. AND it was second hand when I bought it. Pretty reliable mic and does the job perfectly.

@@Angelstarscotland Good to hear, thanks!

@@SunnySingh-tx9rj thanks 🙏

@@lawrencelougheed thanks my friend

Thanks ✌

@@joannelamb72 thanks so much for such a nice comment

@@enochroot9438 thanks 🙏

@@digbydt thanks 🙏

I have a Pro800 already where do you think I got the samples from? It's not that any qualities have been lost it just sounds different. The point of the bank is NOT to attempt to make the Wavestate sound like Pro800 rather to add a bit of flavour from the Pro800 to the Wavestate. With the exception of the Drums(one Shots) I've only sampled the Raw waveforms from the Pro800, the sound design is all done on the Wavestate, the filters, envelopes, FX etc. So essentially it should sound like a Wavestate with a hint of Pro800. To replicate the sounds from the PRo800 on the Wavestate is a completely pointless task for me. Don't get me wrong the Pro800 (for the price) is an amazing 8 note analogue polysyntyh. However it's a very limited synth engine you actually have a LOT more control over the sound from a sound design perspective on a Wavestate. The two synths are not really comparable its oranges and apples at the end of the day.

@Angelstarscotland Yeah but I take samples every day They don't sound analog once you sample them. I have the sample editor And the korg wavestate. And when your speading the sample across the entire key bed you lose a lot of characters. You end up with a less quality sound with no controll over the parameters of the preset. I also have the pro 800

@Angelstarscotland Once you sample them And design a patch On the korg wave state you are stuck with that one sound. You can't tweak the preset Sure you can add color and flavor But I can do that with other effects anyway

@Angelstarscotland Don't get me wrong I bet that your preset pack is really awesome. I might even purchase it.

@@CyberWaveRadio-nn4om Of course if you want it to sound analogue you don’t digitally sample and loop it. I understand what you mean by control, if you sample a completed patch you wouldn’t be able to control the sound much afterwards and if doing that you really need to sample every note. However it was only the basic waveforms I’ve sampled from the pro800, like saw, square triangle, pulse and a unison saw. Unison saw is nice because then you can make supersaw pads that’s impossible on the pro800. So you actually have a lot more control over what you can do from a sound design perspective than what you could do with a saw on a Pro800. You have a lot more filter options , envelopes LFOs and mod possibilities without even touching wavesequencing. Although you can’t cross mod waveforms like on the pro800, all synths have their advantages over others. I’ve done a lot of sound design on the Wavestate using raw oscillators from other synths, it does certainly beef up compared to factory samples. The presets I made using the Matrixbrute oscillators sounded mega fat.

@@lawrencelougheed thanks 🙏

@@Angelstarscotland Just realized that apparently I liked and commented on this video, twice - two months apart. LOL. Apparently I'm consistent 🙂

The more the merrier lol thanks for your support

@@layzfade yes, it has its own sound engine

@@Has-hos thanks

@@SM-my4pv thanks 🙏

Thanks! 😃

@@DrSynth thanks my friend next time I’ll get the keytar out

@@Mchannemann thanks 🙏

@@GEOSynths thanks Jamie hope you’re well

@@nicholasbalette6354 thanks 🙏

@@MarkSoundDesigner thank you 🙏

@@JDSoundsets thanks James

@@ScottsSynthStuff yeah I agree, it’s a fan soft synth the 2600 from Korg

thanks

@@user-po1zs2gc4s thanks 🙏

Thank YOU! this is an old bank of mine now but it's still nice to see people still appreciate it!

Hi Thanks for your comment. I'd recommend checking out Qui Robinez and his tutorials

Hi thanks for your comment/question. I'd love to be able to answer your question could I ask which preset are you referring too? Then I can tell you the purpose.

@@Angelstarscotland Hi! Presets 01 and 02. Thank you and greetings

@@lavoltabbona Ahh I see what you are talking about. It's just a way of controlling the Polyphonic aftertouch, the purpose is to add expression and variation to the sound.

@@Angelstarscotland thank you man!

?

Thanks 🙏

@@Angelstarscotland 😎👌

Thanks Joe, this is a new one I put together today and will be in my volume 12 collection when I eventually complete it.

@@Angelstarscotland Looking forward to it, then! Thanks!

thanks my friend

I'm good a few synth things going on in the background synth wise I can't talk about. Regarding the WS it's Volume 12 for me so I'm trying to be a bit more experimental so my new patches don't just sound like the old ones lol. Hope you are well to my friend

@Angelstarscotland Ahh, sounds enticing Marc, we'll await further! .... yeah, all good here thanks 😎👍🍻

@@theaudioeng glad to hear you’re well

Thanks 🙏

Thanks 🙏

Thanks so much!

Thanks 🙏 my friend

Thank you 🙏

Thanks 🙏

Thanks for such a nice comment

thanks Jade :)

was this a private argument?

Thanks 🙏 much appreciated