Subscribe www.TTvideos.de?Lang=1 to get table tennis videos from lots of You Tube Uploaders. (you can also choose between several forms of subscriptions)
Abonniere www.TTvideos.de um Tischtennis Videos von allen möglichen You Tube Uploadern zu bekommen. (Du kannst dort ausserdem zwischen mehreren Abos deine Favoriten auswählen)
Ma lin is absolutely a penhold legend. You can hardly see similar tactics in modern TT games. Maze performed quite well in this tournament, just Ma Lin did better. What a great match!
Quelle merveille le touché de balle exceptionnel des joueurs. Patrick, pour l'avoir rencontré est incroyable ces balles retombent et sont courbées quant à Werner son revers est court et très efficient, en CD grande amplitude mais dosée à mort. Du très grand art.
Wow Henzell is very talented. He was more than a match for Wang and probably deserved the win. A couple of wayward backhands cost him I think. Very impressive for an Australian player. No slight against Aussies but i've never seen one of that level.
I'm not sure he was more than a match for Wang, I think Wang definitely deserved this win. Henzell's wayward backhands were always at crucial moments, where he COULD have capitalized and taken control of the game which is telling, he's wasn't a mature enough player. Sometimes even when players look closely matched, there's actually a large gap between them. I think this match is a good example of this
Ma Lin can be a sneaky so-and-so, but he's also the best tactical Chinese player I've ever seen. Maze was playing well, and exploiting a (then) Chinese weakness against high lobs. So Ma LIn gave him very little chance to play them. So many drop shots, keeping Maze stretching and close to the table. A great performance.
Not a convincing win for WLQ at all. I do wish that Henzell won this match, and I think he's the rightful winner, as he played better. Wang Liqin coped very well mentally, but this was a poor match for Wang.
@@ttime9947 Because he played better. serving is a big part of table tennis, as a point cannot start without it, and this time william had the better serve. at 10 -10 wang got "lucky" as he hit the edge of his bat.
Cho'ing is fkn annoying. Bad sportsmanship to shout so loud, it's a disturbance to the opponent.. And clearly something Ma Lin played on in this match, given he knew about Maze's temper..
ugotownedk Exactly...Ma Lin is hardly known for his sportsmanship anyway...very few Chinese players actually have any sportsman spirit, Wang Liqin being a pleasant exception....they just want to win by any means, fair or unfair.
@@inyourface123 clearly you don’t know the sport nor the Chinese team. It is a norm in ping pong for the players to shout after a deserved point and Wang Chuqin was infamous for once throwing the racket at his opponent.
Ma Lin technically defected Maze, who defects Wang hao 4-0 and Hao Shui 4:3 before. WIth his excellent "hand-feeling" on ball and excellent control and aggressive chop block, Maze made no idea how to play with him.
Nothing is impossible because Wang is getting older and he's a player that waits for the opponent's mistakes. Wang liqin lost against an Iranian not so famous, cause that guy plays with both hands. I knew they became friends from Henzell's videos.
I wonder what would have happened if Henzell had won that second game. Liqin probably would have come back and won anyway but a 2-0 deficit is a challenge even for the top Chinese players. I did not know that they became friends after but I do know that Liqin is a great sport and probably had mad respect for Henzell after their match
I noticed that also. This match was all about the serve. Wang Liqin started to figure out how to return the Henzell serve starting at 7-2 in the second game. Before that point Liqin is lost and Henzell is on fire. From this point on Liqin starts to play better and Henzell plays well also but he has a few too many costly errors.
Some chinese top-players have tendency to "fall asleep" in the beginning of games against easy opponents. Then they "woke up" later and their opponents have no chances then
i wouldn't say Henzell is an easy opponent,that's for sure. Despite being ranked in the top world 100 at something like 90 his game when on is DEFINATELY a top 30 game. i know this as it is common knowledge within the international scene. You just have to look at his game here despite the obvious mistakes to see that. Also in his career he has consistently beaten players in the top 50. Rankings are not always accurate as they reflect tournament play . At his best even if Waldner only played a few tournaments his ranking would probably not reflect his skill and how good he is. Its the same with anyone else. THE MAN DESERVES ALL THE RESPECT POSSIBLE. Also for anyone to make it in the top 100 world rankings for their sport is imo achieving a level beyond 99%of people whom play that sport and are deserving of great admiration and respect.
Wang Liqin wasn't so good against backhand oriented players,he lost important matches against Samsonov and Schlager due to his backhand deficiency and his rather limited touch.
